Sonne Christian, Jenssen Bjørn M, Rinklebe Jörg, Lam Su Shiung, Hansen Martin, Bossi Rossana, Gustavson Kim, Dietz Rune
Aarhus University, Department of Ecoscience, Roskilde, Denmark; Sustainability Cluster, School of Engineering, University of Petroleum & Energy Studies, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248007, India.
Aarhus University, Department of Ecoscience, Roskilde, Denmark; Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Biology, Trondheim, Norway.
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jun 10;876:162770. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162770. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
The Environmental Protection Agencies (EPAs) of Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Germany and the Netherlands submitted a proposal to the European Chemical Agency (ECHA) in February 2023 calling for a ban in the use of toxic industrial chemicals per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). These chemicals are highly toxic causing elevated cholesterol, immune suppression, reproductive failure, cancer and neuro-endocrine disruption in humans and wildlife being a significant threat to biodiversity and human health. The main reason for the submitted proposal is recent findings of significant flaws in the transition to PFAS replacements that is leading to a widespread pollution. Denmark was the first country banning PFAS, and now other EU countries support the restrictions of these carcinogenic, endocrine disruptive and immunotoxic chemicals. The proposed plan is among the most extensive received by the ECHA for 50 years. Denmark is now the first EU country to initiate the establishment of groundwater parks to try and protect its drinking water. These parks are areas free of agricultural activities and nutritious sewage sludge to secure drinking water free of xenobiotic including PFAS. The PFAS pollution also reflects the lack of comprehensive spatial and temporal environmental monitoring programs in the EU. Such monitoring programs should include key indicator species across ecosystems of livestock, fish and wildlife, to facilitate detection of early ecological warning signals and sustain public health. Simultaneously with inferring a total PFAS ban, the EU should also push for more persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic (PBT) PFAS substances to be listed on the Stockholm Convention (SC) Annex A such as PFOS (perfluorooctane sulfonic acid) that is currently listed on the SCs Annex B. The combination of these regulative restrictions combined with groundwater parks and pan-European biomonitoring programs, would pave the way forward for a cleaner environment to sustain health across the EU.
丹麦、瑞典、挪威、德国和荷兰的环境保护局于2023年2月向欧洲化学品管理局(ECHA)提交了一项提案,呼吁禁止使用有毒工业化学品全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)。这些化学品毒性极高,会导致人类和野生动物的胆固醇升高、免疫抑制、生殖功能衰竭、癌症以及神经内分泌紊乱,对生物多样性和人类健康构成重大威胁。提交该提案的主要原因是最近发现向PFAS替代品的过渡存在重大缺陷,这导致了广泛的污染。丹麦是第一个禁止PFAS的国家,现在其他欧盟国家也支持对这些致癌、内分泌干扰和免疫毒性化学品进行限制。该提案计划是ECHA在50年来收到的最广泛的提案之一。丹麦现在是第一个启动建立地下水保护区以试图保护其饮用水的欧盟国家。这些保护区是没有农业活动和营养污水污泥的区域,以确保饮用水不含包括PFAS在内的外来生物。PFAS污染也反映出欧盟缺乏全面的时空环境监测计划。这样的监测计划应包括牲畜、鱼类和野生动物等生态系统中的关键指示物种,以便于检测早期生态预警信号并维护公众健康。在推断全面禁止PFAS的同时,欧盟还应推动将更多持久性、生物累积性和毒性(PBT)的PFAS物质列入《斯德哥尔摩公约》(SC)附件A,例如目前列入SC附件B的全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)。这些监管限制措施与地下水保护区和泛欧生物监测计划相结合,将为欧盟实现更清洁的环境以维护健康铺平道路。