Suppr超能文献

BPZE1 鼻内减毒活百日咳疫苗的免疫原性和安全性与破伤风-白喉-无细胞百日咳疫苗的比较:一项随机、双盲、2b 期临床试验。

Immunogenicity and safety of BPZE1, an intranasal live attenuated pertussis vaccine, versus tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine: a randomised, double-blind, phase 2b trial.

机构信息

ILiAD Biotechnologies, Weston, FL, USA.

DM Clinical Research, Texas Center for Drug Development, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Lancet. 2023 Mar 11;401(10379):843-855. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02644-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bordetella pertussis epidemics persist as transmission remains unabated despite high acellular pertussis vaccination rates. BPZE1, a live attenuated intranasal pertussis vaccine, was designed to prevent B pertussis infection and disease. We aimed to assess the immunogenicity and safety of BPZE1 compared with the tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap).

METHODS

In this double-blind, phase 2b trial at three research centres in the USA, healthy adults aged 18-50 years were randomly assigned (2:2:1:1) via a permuted block randomisation schedule to receive BPZE1 vaccination followed by BPZE1 attenuated challenge, BPZE1 vaccination followed by placebo challenge, Tdap followed by BPZE1 attenuated challenge, or Tdap followed by placebo challenge. On day 1, lyophilised BPZE1 was reconstituted with sterile water and given intranasally (0·4 mL delivered to each nostril), whereas Tdap was given intramuscularly. To maintain masking, participants in the BPZE1 groups received an intramuscular saline injection, and those in the Tdap groups received intranasal lyophilised placebo buffer. The attenuated challenge took place on day 85. The primary immunogenicity endpoint was the proportion of participants achieving nasal secretory IgA seroconversion against at least one B pertussis antigen on day 29 or day 113. Reactogenicity was assessed up to 7 days after vaccination and challenge, and adverse events were recorded for 28 days after vaccination and challenge. Serious adverse events were monitored throughout the study. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03942406.

FINDINGS

Between June 17 and Oct 3, 2019, 458 participants were screened and 280 were randomly assigned to the main cohort: 92 to the BPZE1-BPZE1 group, 92 to the BPZE1-placebo group, 46 to the Tdap-BPZE1 group, and 50 to the Tdap-placebo group. Seroconversion of at least one B pertussis-specific nasal secretory IgA was recorded in 79 (94% [95% CI 87-98]) of 84 participants in the BPZE1-BPZE1 group, 89 (95% [88-98]) of 94 in the BPZE1-placebo group, 38 (90% [77-97]) of 42 in the Tdap-BPZE1 group, and 42 (93% [82-99]) of 45 in the Tdap-placebo group. BPZE1 induced broad and consistent B pertussis-specific mucosal secretory IgA responses, whereas Tdap did not induce consistent mucosal secretory IgA responses. Both vaccines were well tolerated, with mild reactogenicity and no serious adverse events related to study vaccination.

INTERPRETATION

BPZE1 induced nasal mucosal immunity and produced functional serum responses. BPZE1 has the potential to avert B pertussis infections, which ultimately could lead to reduced transmission and diminished epidemic cycles. These results should be confirmed in large phase 3 trials.

FUNDING

ILiAD Biotechnologies.

摘要

背景

尽管无细胞百日咳疫苗接种率很高,但博德特氏菌百日咳的流行仍未得到遏制。BPZE1 是一种减毒的鼻内百日咳疫苗,旨在预防 B 型百日咳感染和疾病。我们旨在评估 BPZE1 与破伤风白喉无细胞百日咳疫苗(Tdap)相比的免疫原性和安全性。

方法

在这项在美国三个研究中心进行的双盲、2b 期试验中,18-50 岁的健康成年人通过排列随机分组(2:2:1:1)接受 BPZE1 疫苗接种,随后接受 BPZE1 减毒挑战、BPZE1 疫苗接种,随后接受安慰剂挑战、Tdap 随后接受 BPZE1 减毒挑战或 Tdap 随后接受安慰剂挑战。第 1 天,将冻干的 BPZE1 用无菌水重悬并鼻内给药(每侧鼻孔 0.4 毫升),而 Tdap 则肌内给药。为了保持盲法,BPZE1 组的参与者接受肌内生理盐水注射,而 Tdap 组的参与者接受鼻内冻干安慰剂缓冲液。减毒挑战于第 85 天进行。主要免疫原性终点是在第 29 天或第 113 天,至少有 1 种 B 型百日咳抗原鼻分泌物分泌型 IgA 血清转化率达到 100%的参与者比例。在接种和挑战后 7 天内评估反应原性,并在接种和挑战后 28 天内记录不良事件。严重不良事件在整个研究期间均进行监测。这项试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,NCT03942406。

结果

2019 年 6 月 17 日至 10 月 3 日期间,共有 458 名参与者接受了筛查,其中 280 名被随机分配到主要队列:92 名参与者进入 BPZE1-BPZE1 组,92 名进入 BPZE1-安慰剂组,46 名进入 Tdap-BPZE1 组,50 名进入 Tdap-安慰剂组。在 84 名接受 BPZE1-BPZE1 治疗的参与者中,有 79 名(94%[95%CI 87-98%])至少有一种 B 型百日咳特异性鼻分泌物分泌型 IgA 发生血清转化,在 94 名接受 BPZE1-安慰剂治疗的参与者中,有 89 名(95%[88-98%])发生血清转化,在 42 名接受 Tdap-BPZE1 治疗的参与者中,有 38 名(90%[77-97%])发生血清转化,在 45 名接受 Tdap-安慰剂治疗的参与者中,有 42 名(93%[82-99%])发生血清转化。BPZE1 诱导了广泛而一致的 B 型百日咳特异性粘膜分泌型 IgA 反应,而 Tdap 则没有诱导一致的粘膜分泌型 IgA 反应。两种疫苗均具有良好的耐受性,反应原性轻微,无与研究接种相关的严重不良事件。

结论

BPZE1 诱导了鼻黏膜免疫,并产生了功能性血清反应。BPZE1 有可能预防 B 型百日咳感染,这最终可能会减少传播并减少流行周期。这些结果应在大型 3 期试验中得到证实。

资金

ILiAD 生物技术公司。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验