• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术与介入冠状动脉血运重建在肾移植受者中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Surgical versus interventional coronary revascularization in kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.

Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Int Urol Nephrol. 2023 Oct;55(10):2493-2499. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03546-9. Epub 2023 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1007/s11255-023-03546-9
PMID:36906876
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10499735/
Abstract

AIM

To study the most beneficial coronary revascularization strategy in kidney transplant recipients (KTR).

METHODS

In 16th June 2022 and updated on 26th February 2023, we searched in five databases including PubMed for relevant articles. The odds ratio (OR) together with the 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were used to report the results.

RESULTS

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was significantly associated with significant lower in-hospital mortality (OR 0.62; 95%CI 0.51-0.75) and 1-year mortality (OR 0.81; 95%CI 0.68-0.97), but not overall mortality (mortality at the last follow-up point) (OR 1.05; 95%CI 0.93-1.18) rather than coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Moreover, PCI was significantly associated with lower acute kidney injury prevalence (OR 0.33; 95%CI 0.13-0.84) compared to CABG. One study indicated that non-fatal graft failure prevalence did not differ between the PCI and the CABG group until 3 years of follow up. Moreover, one study demonstrated a short hospital length of stay in the PCI group rather than the CABG group.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence indicated the superiority of PCI than CABG as a coronary revascularization procedure in short- but not long-term outcomes in KTR. We recommend further randomized clinical trials for demonstrating the best therapeutic modality for coronary revascularization in KTR.

摘要

目的

研究肾移植受者(KTR)最有益的冠状动脉血运重建策略。

方法

在 2022 年 6 月 16 日和 2023 年 2 月 26 日更新时,我们在五个数据库中(包括 PubMed)搜索了相关文章。使用比值比(OR)及其 95%置信区间(95%CI)报告结果。

结果

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)与住院期间死亡率显著降低(OR 0.62;95%CI 0.51-0.75)和 1 年死亡率(OR 0.81;95%CI 0.68-0.97)显著相关,但与全因死亡率(最后随访点的死亡率)(OR 1.05;95%CI 0.93-1.18)无关,而非冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)。此外,与 CABG 相比,PCI 与较低的急性肾损伤发生率(OR 0.33;95%CI 0.13-0.84)显著相关。一项研究表明,在 3 年随访期间,PCI 组和 CABG 组之间非致命移植物失功发生率没有差异。此外,一项研究表明,PCI 组的住院时间短于 CABG 组。

结论

目前的证据表明,在 KTR 中,PCI 作为一种冠状动脉血运重建术,在短期而不是长期结果中优于 CABG。我们建议进一步进行随机临床试验,以证明 KTR 冠状动脉血运重建的最佳治疗方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0578/10499735/cbeaa9994691/11255_2023_3546_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0578/10499735/bf6d346cce5e/11255_2023_3546_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0578/10499735/7895646ece96/11255_2023_3546_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0578/10499735/7f85a6e8ae3b/11255_2023_3546_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0578/10499735/ad52b3b5c80e/11255_2023_3546_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0578/10499735/cbeaa9994691/11255_2023_3546_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0578/10499735/bf6d346cce5e/11255_2023_3546_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0578/10499735/7895646ece96/11255_2023_3546_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0578/10499735/7f85a6e8ae3b/11255_2023_3546_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0578/10499735/ad52b3b5c80e/11255_2023_3546_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0578/10499735/cbeaa9994691/11255_2023_3546_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Surgical versus interventional coronary revascularization in kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.手术与介入冠状动脉血运重建在肾移植受者中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2023 Oct;55(10):2493-2499. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03546-9. Epub 2023 Mar 12.
2
Ten-year outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel or left main coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.多支血管病变或左主干冠状动脉疾病行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗 10 年的结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Feb 2;18(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13019-023-02101-y.
3
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
4
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease.基于运动的冠心病心脏康复。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 6;11(11):CD001800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub4.
5
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery in dialysis-dependent patients: A pooled meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术在依赖透析患者中的比较:重建时间事件数据的荟萃分析。
J Card Surg. 2022 Oct;37(10):3365-3373. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16805. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
6
Mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis of individual patient data.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗支架置入治疗冠状动脉疾病的死亡率:一项个体患者数据的合并分析。
Lancet. 2018 Mar 10;391(10124):939-948. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30423-9. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
7
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease.基于运动的冠心病心脏康复
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 5;2016(1):CD001800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub3.
8
Coronary artery bypass surgery compared with percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 6 randomized controlled trials.胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者冠状动脉搭桥手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较:6项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016 Jan 6;15:2. doi: 10.1186/s12933-015-0323-z.
9
Percutaneous intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery in left main coronary artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干冠状动脉狭窄:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2017 Apr 21;15(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0853-1.
10
Comparison of long-term outcomes of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention for left main disease.微创冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗左主干病变的长期疗效比较。
Coron Artery Dis. 2025 Aug 1;36(5):406-415. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001504. Epub 2025 Jan 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Coronary revascularisation in patients with chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease: A meta-analysis.慢性肾脏病和终末期肾病患者的冠状动脉血运重建:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Nov;75(11):e14506. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14506. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
2
Burden of disease: Prevalence and incidence of endstage renal disease in Middle Eastern countries.疾病负担:中东国家终末期肾病的患病率和发病率
Clin Nephrol. 2020 Supplement-Jan;93(1):120-123. doi: 10.5414/CNP92S121.
3
Comparing the effectiveness of revascularization interventions with medical therapy in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
比较血运重建干预措施与药物治疗对缺血性心肌病患者的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2018 Dec 19;32:127. doi: 10.14196/mjiri.32.127. eCollection 2018.
4
Cardiovascular risk in renal transplant recipients.肾移植受者的心血管风险。
J Nephrol. 2019 Jun;32(3):389-399. doi: 10.1007/s40620-018-0549-4. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
5
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in heart transplant recipients with coronary allograft vasculopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1,520 patients.心脏移植受者发生冠状动脉移植血管病变时,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较:1520例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Jan;7(1):19-30. doi: 10.21037/acs.2018.01.10.
6
Comparison of the Frequency of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Renal Transplant Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的肾移植患者急性肾损伤发生率的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;120(7):1104-1109. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.06.047. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
7
Recurrent Acute Kidney Injury in Renal Transplant Patients: A Single-Center Study.肾移植患者复发性急性肾损伤:一项单中心研究
Transplant Proc. 2015 Jun;47(5):1437-41. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.04.077.
8
Coronary Revascularization in Chronic and End-Stage Renal Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.慢性和终末期肾病中的冠状动脉血运重建:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Ther. 2016 Jan-Feb;23(1):e16-28. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000089.
9
Risk of end-stage renal disease and death after cardiovascular events in chronic kidney disease.心血管事件后慢性肾脏病患者的终末期肾病和死亡风险。
Circulation. 2014 Aug 5;130(6):458-65. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.007106. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
10
Risks of death and graft failure after surgical versus percutaneous coronary revascularization in renal transplant patients.肾移植患者行冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后的死亡和移植物失败风险。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2013 Feb 12;2(1):e003558. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.003558.