Department Of Neurology, State University of New York Downstate, Brooklyn, New York, 11203, USA.
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, State University of New York Downstate, Brooklyn, New York, 11203, USA.
Epilepsia. 2023 May;64(5):e48-e55. doi: 10.1111/epi.17582. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
How responsive neurostimulation (RNS) decreases seizure frequency is unclear. Stimulation may alter epileptic networks during inter-ictal epochs. Definitions of the epileptic network vary but fast ripples (FRs) may be an important substrate. We, therefore, examined whether stimulation of FR-generating networks differed in RNS super responders and intermediate responders. In 10 patients, with subsequent RNS placement, we detected FRs from stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) contacts during pre-surgical evaluation. The normalized coordinates of the SEEG contacts were compared with those of the eight RNS contacts, and RNS-stimulated SEEG contacts were defined as those within 1.5 cm of the RNS contacts. We compared the post-RNS placement seizure outcome to (1) the ratio of stimulated SEEG contacts in the seizure-onset zone (SOZ stimulation ratio [SR]); (2) the ratio of FR events on stimulated contacts (FR SR); and (3) the global efficiency of the FR temporal correlational network on stimulated contacts (FR SGe). We found that the SOZ SR (p = .18) and FR SR (p = .06) did not differ in the RNS super responders and intermediate responders, but the FR SGe did (p = .02). In super responders, highly active desynchronous sites of the FR network were stimulated. RNS that better targets FR networks, as compared to the SOZ, may reduce epileptogenicity more.
反应性神经刺激(RNS)如何降低癫痫发作频率尚不清楚。刺激可能会在发作间期改变癫痫网络。癫痫网络的定义各不相同,但快波(FRs)可能是一个重要的基质。因此,我们研究了 RNS 超级反应者和中级反应者的 FR 生成网络刺激是否存在差异。在随后进行 RNS 放置的 10 名患者中,我们在术前评估期间从立体脑电图(SEEG)接触中检测到 FR。SEEG 接触的归一化坐标与 RNS 接触的坐标进行了比较,并且将 RNS 刺激的 SEEG 接触定义为与 RNS 接触的距离在 1.5 厘米以内的接触。我们将 RNS 放置后的癫痫发作结果与以下因素进行了比较:(1)SEIZ 刺激区(SOZ 刺激比 [SR])中刺激的 SEEG 接触的比例;(2)刺激接触部位的 FR 事件的比例(FR SR);以及(3)刺激接触部位 FR 时间相关网络的全局效率(FR SGe)。我们发现,RNS 超级反应者和中级反应者之间的 SOZ SR(p=0.18)和 FR SR(p=0.06)没有差异,但 FR SGe 存在差异(p=0.02)。在超级反应者中,FR 网络的高度活跃去同步部位受到了刺激。与 SOZ 相比,更好地针对 FR 网络的 RNS 可能会降低致痫性。