野兔与蜂蜜：作为变革性学习的医疗保健：对佩洛斯基等人所著《我们真的能“解读”艺术以洞察大脑的变化吗？》的评论 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

The hare and the honey: Health care as transformative learning: Comment on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain?" by Pelowski et al.

作者信息

Koksma Jur, Stap Thieme B

机构信息

Radboudumc Health Academy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Phys Life Rev. 2023 Jul;45:3-5. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2023.02.003. Epub 2023 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.plrev.2023.02.003

PMID:36907009

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

The hare and the honey: Health care as transformative learning: Comment on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain?" by Pelowski et al.野兔与蜂蜜：作为变革性学习的医疗保健：对佩洛斯基等人所著《我们真的能“解读”艺术以洞察大脑的变化吗？》的评论

Phys Life Rev. 2023 Jul;45:3-5. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2023.02.003. Epub 2023 Mar 5.

What art can tell us about the human brain, in health and disease: Comment on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain?" by Matthew Pelowski et al.艺术能告诉我们关于健康与疾病状态下的人类大脑的哪些信息：对马修·佩洛斯基等人所著《我们真的能“解读”艺术以洞察大脑的变化吗？》的评论

Phys Life Rev. 2023 Jul;45:52-55. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2023.03.002. Epub 2023 Mar 24.

No sound evidence supports the notion that we can "read" art: Comment on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain? A review and empirical assessment of clinical case reports and published artworks for systematic evidence of quality and style changes linked to damage or neurodegenerative disease" by Pelowski et al. (2022).没有可靠的证据支持我们能够“解读”艺术这一观点：评佩洛维斯基等人（2022年）的《我们真的能“解读”艺术以观察大脑的变化吗？对临床病例报告和已发表艺术作品的综述及实证评估，以寻找与损伤或神经退行性疾病相关的质量和风格变化的系统证据》

Phys Life Rev. 2023 Mar;44:110-112. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2022.12.017. Epub 2022 Dec 28.

Can we "read" art…at all? A psychometric perspective on the possibility of measuring artwork attributes: Comment on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain? A review and empirical assessment of clinical case reports and published artworks for systematic evidence of quality and style changes linked to damage or neurodegenerative disease" by Pelowski et al. (2022).我们究竟能否“解读”艺术？关于测量艺术品属性可能性的心理测量学视角：评佩洛斯基等人（2022年）的《我们真的能“解读”艺术以观察大脑的变化吗？对临床病例报告和已发表艺术品的综述及实证评估，以获取与损伤或神经退行性疾病相关的质量和风格变化的系统证据》

Phys Life Rev. 2023 Mar;44:48-50. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2022.11.010. Epub 2022 Dec 5.

Creativity, art and brain: Comment on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain? A review and empirical assessment of clinical case reports and published artworks for systematic evidence of quality and style changes linked to damage or neurodegenerative disease" by Matthew Pelowski et al.创造力、艺术与大脑：评马修·佩洛夫斯基等人的《我们真的能“解读”艺术以洞察大脑的变化吗？对临床病例报告及已发表艺术作品的综述与实证评估，以获取与损伤或神经退行性疾病相关的质量和风格变化的系统证据》

Phys Life Rev. 2023 Mar;44:116-118. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2022.12.018. Epub 2023 Jan 3.

Changes in style as a diagnostic medical tool or a way to study creativity in art?: Comment on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain? A review and empirical assessment of clinical case reports and published artworks for systematic evidence of quality and style changes linked to damage or neurodegenerative disease" by Pelowski et al. (2022).风格变化作为一种诊断医学工具或研究艺术创造力的方式？：评佩洛夫斯基等人（2022年）的《我们真的能“解读”艺术以观察大脑的变化吗？对临床病例报告和已发表艺术作品的综述及实证评估，以获取与损伤或神经退行性疾病相关的质量和风格变化的系统证据》

Phys Life Rev. 2023 Sep;46:52-55. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2023.04.002. Epub 2023 Apr 24.

Art as a window to altered perception? - A possible understanding of neurodegenerative diseases through the philosophy of Konrad Fiedler: Comment on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain? A review and empirical assessment of clinical case reports and published artworks for systematic evidence of quality and style changes linked to damage or neurodegenerative disease" by Matthew Pelowski et al.艺术是感知改变的窗口？——通过康拉德·费德勒的哲学对神经退行性疾病的一种可能理解：评马修·佩洛夫斯基等人的《我们真的能“解读”艺术以洞察大脑变化吗？对临床病例报告和已发表艺术作品的综述及实证评估，以获取与损伤或神经退行性疾病相关的质量和风格变化的系统证据》

Phys Life Rev. 2023 Mar;44:160-162. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2023.01.005. Epub 2023 Jan 10.

Bridging neurodegenerative diseases and artistic expressivity: The significance of testable models and causal inference: Comment on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain? A review and empirical assessment of clinical case reports and published artworks for systematic evidence of quality and style changes linked to damage or neurodegenerative disease" by Pelowski et al. (2022).连接神经退行性疾病与艺术表现力：可测试模型和因果推断的重要性：对佩洛维斯基等人（2022年）所著《我们真的能“解读”艺术以洞察大脑变化吗？对临床病例报告和已发表艺术作品的综述及实证评估，以获取与损伤或神经退行性疾病相关的质量和风格变化的系统证据》的评论

Phys Life Rev. 2023 Jul;45:66-70. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2023.04.006. Epub 2023 Apr 28.

Goldstein's 'catastrophic reactions' reinterpreted as neuroaesthetic 'signatures': Comment on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain? A review and empirical assessment of clinical case reports and published artworks for systematic evidence of quality and style changes linked to damage or neurodegenerative disease" by Matthew Pelowski et al.戈尔茨坦的“灾难性反应”被重新诠释为神经美学的“特征”：评马修·佩洛夫斯基等人的《我们真的能“解读”艺术以观察大脑的变化吗？对临床病例报告和已发表艺术作品的综述及实证评估，以获取与损伤或神经退行性疾病相关的质量和风格变化的系统证据》

Phys Life Rev. 2023 Mar;44:91-93. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2022.12.006. Epub 2022 Dec 14.

Prognostic potential of reading art in brain damage and the possible contribution of non-invasive brain stimulation: Comment on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain? A review and empirical assessment of clinical case reports and published artworks for systematic evidence of quality and style changes linked to damage or neurodegenerative disease" by Matthew Pelowski, Blanca T.M. Spee, et al.阅读艺术在脑损伤中的预后潜力及非侵入性脑刺激的可能作用：评马修·佩洛夫斯基、布兰卡·T.M. 斯皮等人的《我们真的能“阅读”艺术来观察大脑的变化吗？对临床病例报告和已发表艺术作品的综述及实证评估，以获取与损伤或神经退行性疾病相关的质量和风格变化的系统证据》

Phys Life Rev. 2023 Jul;45:25-28. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2023.02.004. Epub 2023 Mar 5.

引用本文的文献

Co-creating a person-centered creative engagement intervention for Parkinson's care.共同创建以患者为中心的帕金森病护理创意参与干预措施。

Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 15;15:1469120. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1469120. eCollection 2024.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验