• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

What art can tell us about the human brain, in health and disease: Comment on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain?" by Matthew Pelowski et al.

作者信息

Bloem Bastiaan R, Volpe Daniele

机构信息

Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Department of Neurology, the Netherlands.

Department of Neurorehabilitation, Fresco Parkinson Center - Casa di Cura Villa Margherita - S. Stefano Riabilitazione, via Costacolonna n 1 Arcugnano, Vicenza, Italy.

出版信息

Phys Life Rev. 2023 Jul;45:52-55. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2023.03.002. Epub 2023 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.plrev.2023.03.002
PMID:37004337
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
What art can tell us about the human brain, in health and disease: Comment on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain?" by Matthew Pelowski et al.艺术能告诉我们关于健康与疾病状态下的人类大脑的哪些信息：对马修·佩洛斯基等人所著《我们真的能“解读”艺术以洞察大脑的变化吗？》的评论
Phys Life Rev. 2023 Jul;45:52-55. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2023.03.002. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
2
Creativity, art and brain: Comment on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain? A review and empirical assessment of clinical case reports and published artworks for systematic evidence of quality and style changes linked to damage or neurodegenerative disease" by Matthew Pelowski et al.创造力、艺术与大脑：评马修·佩洛夫斯基等人的《我们真的能“解读”艺术以洞察大脑的变化吗？对临床病例报告及已发表艺术作品的综述与实证评估，以获取与损伤或神经退行性疾病相关的质量和风格变化的系统证据》
Phys Life Rev. 2023 Mar;44:116-118. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2022.12.018. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
3
Goldstein's 'catastrophic reactions' reinterpreted as neuroaesthetic 'signatures': Comment on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain? A review and empirical assessment of clinical case reports and published artworks for systematic evidence of quality and style changes linked to damage or neurodegenerative disease" by Matthew Pelowski et al.戈尔茨坦的“灾难性反应”被重新诠释为神经美学的“特征”：评马修·佩洛夫斯基等人的《我们真的能“解读”艺术以观察大脑的变化吗？对临床病例报告和已发表艺术作品的综述及实证评估，以获取与损伤或神经退行性疾病相关的质量和风格变化的系统证据》
Phys Life Rev. 2023 Mar;44:91-93. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2022.12.006. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
4
Art as a window to altered perception? - A possible understanding of neurodegenerative diseases through the philosophy of Konrad Fiedler: Comment on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain? A review and empirical assessment of clinical case reports and published artworks for systematic evidence of quality and style changes linked to damage or neurodegenerative disease" by Matthew Pelowski et al.艺术是感知改变的窗口？——通过康拉德·费德勒的哲学对神经退行性疾病的一种可能理解：评马修·佩洛夫斯基等人的《我们真的能“解读”艺术以洞察大脑变化吗？对临床病例报告和已发表艺术作品的综述及实证评估，以获取与损伤或神经退行性疾病相关的质量和风格变化的系统证据》
Phys Life Rev. 2023 Mar;44:160-162. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2023.01.005. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
5
No sound evidence supports the notion that we can "read" art: Comment on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain? A review and empirical assessment of clinical case reports and published artworks for systematic evidence of quality and style changes linked to damage or neurodegenerative disease" by Pelowski et al. (2022).没有可靠的证据支持我们能够“解读”艺术这一观点：评佩洛维斯基等人（2022年）的《我们真的能“解读”艺术以观察大脑的变化吗？对临床病例报告和已发表艺术作品的综述及实证评估，以寻找与损伤或神经退行性疾病相关的质量和风格变化的系统证据》
Phys Life Rev. 2023 Mar;44:110-112. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2022.12.017. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
6
Prognostic potential of reading art in brain damage and the possible contribution of non-invasive brain stimulation: Comment on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain? A review and empirical assessment of clinical case reports and published artworks for systematic evidence of quality and style changes linked to damage or neurodegenerative disease" by Matthew Pelowski, Blanca T.M. Spee, et al.阅读艺术在脑损伤中的预后潜力及非侵入性脑刺激的可能作用：评马修·佩洛夫斯基、布兰卡·T.M. 斯皮等人的《我们真的能“阅读”艺术来观察大脑的变化吗？对临床病例报告和已发表艺术作品的综述及实证评估，以获取与损伤或神经退行性疾病相关的质量和风格变化的系统证据》
Phys Life Rev. 2023 Jul;45:25-28. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2023.02.004. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
7
Can we "read" art…at all? A psychometric perspective on the possibility of measuring artwork attributes: Comment on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain? A review and empirical assessment of clinical case reports and published artworks for systematic evidence of quality and style changes linked to damage or neurodegenerative disease" by Pelowski et al. (2022).我们究竟能否“解读”艺术？关于测量艺术品属性可能性的心理测量学视角：评佩洛斯基等人（2022年）的《我们真的能“解读”艺术以观察大脑的变化吗？对临床病例报告和已发表艺术品的综述及实证评估，以获取与损伤或神经退行性疾病相关的质量和风格变化的系统证据》
Phys Life Rev. 2023 Mar;44:48-50. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2022.11.010. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
8
Changes in style as a diagnostic medical tool or a way to study creativity in art?: Comment on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain? A review and empirical assessment of clinical case reports and published artworks for systematic evidence of quality and style changes linked to damage or neurodegenerative disease" by Pelowski et al. (2022).风格变化作为一种诊断医学工具或研究艺术创造力的方式？：评佩洛夫斯基等人（2022年）的《我们真的能“解读”艺术以观察大脑的变化吗？对临床病例报告和已发表艺术作品的综述及实证评估，以获取与损伤或神经退行性疾病相关的质量和风格变化的系统证据》
Phys Life Rev. 2023 Sep;46:52-55. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2023.04.002. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
9
Bridging neurodegenerative diseases and artistic expressivity: The significance of testable models and causal inference: Comment on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain? A review and empirical assessment of clinical case reports and published artworks for systematic evidence of quality and style changes linked to damage or neurodegenerative disease" by Pelowski et al. (2022).连接神经退行性疾病与艺术表现力：可测试模型和因果推断的重要性：对佩洛维斯基等人（2022年）所著《我们真的能“解读”艺术以洞察大脑变化吗？对临床病例报告和已发表艺术作品的综述及实证评估，以获取与损伤或神经退行性疾病相关的质量和风格变化的系统证据》的评论
Phys Life Rev. 2023 Jul;45:66-70. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2023.04.006. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
10
From brain images to drawings - New insights informing the creativity-psychopathology debate: Commentary on "Can we really 'read' art to see the changing brain? A review and empirical assessment of clinical case reports and published artworks for systematic evidence of quality and style changes linked to damage or neurodegenerative disease" by Pelowski et al.从脑图像到绘画作品——为创造力与精神病理学争论提供新见解：对佩洛斯基等人所著《我们真的能“解读”艺术以洞察大脑变化吗？对临床病例报告及已发表艺术作品的综述与实证评估，以探寻与损伤或神经退行性疾病相关的质量与风格变化的系统性证据》的评论
Phys Life Rev. 2023 Mar;44:179-183. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2023.01.010. Epub 2023 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of experienced changes in artistic and everyday creativity in people with Parkinson's disease.帕金森病患者艺术创造力和日常创造力变化的发生率
NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2025 Apr 27;11(1):97. doi: 10.1038/s41531-025-00924-1.
2
Co-creating a person-centered creative engagement intervention for Parkinson's care.共同创建以患者为中心的帕金森病护理创意参与干预措施。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 15;15:1469120. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1469120. eCollection 2024.
3
Unleashing creativity in people with Parkinson's disease: a pilot study of a co-designed creative arts therapy.
激发帕金森病患者的创造力：一项联合设计的创意艺术疗法的试点研究。
J Neurol. 2025 Jan 23;272(2):161. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12878-0.
4
If Art Were a Drug: Implications for Parkinson's Disease.如果艺术是一种药物：对帕金森病的影响。
J Parkinsons Dis. 2024;14(s1):S159-S172. doi: 10.3233/JPD-240031.