Suppr超能文献

世界卫生组织“手卫生五个时刻”在麻醉诱导中的应用:基于视频的分析揭示了新的系统挑战和设计机会。

WHO 'My five moments for hand hygiene' in anaesthesia induction: a video-based analysis reveals novel system challenges and design opportunities.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Switzerland.

Institute of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Simulation Center, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 2023 May;135:163-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.03.002. Epub 2023 Mar 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anaesthesia induction is a fast-paced, complex activity that involves a high density of hand-to-surface exposures. Hand hygiene (HH) adherence has been reported to be low, which bears the potential for unnoticed pathogen transmission between consecutive patients.

AIM

To study the fit of the World Health Organization's (WHO) five moments of HH concept to the anaesthesia induction workflow.

METHODS

Video recordings of 59 anaesthesia inductions were analysed according to the WHO HH observation method considering each hand-to-surface exposure of every involved anaesthesia provider. Binary logistic regression was used to determine risk factors for non-adherence, i.e. professional category, gender, task role, gloves, holding of objects, team size and HH moment. Additionally, half of all videos were recoded for quantitative and qualitative analysis of provider self-touching.

FINDINGS

Overall, 2240 HH opportunities were met by 105 HH actions (4.7%). The drug administrator role (odds ratio (OR): 2.2), the senior physician status (OR: 2.1), donning (OR: 2.6) and doffing (OR: 3.6) of gloves were associated with higher HH adherence. Notably, 47.2% of all HH opportunities were caused by self-touching behaviour. Provider clothes, face, and patient skin were the most frequently touched surfaces.

CONCLUSION

The high density of hand-to-surface exposures, a high cognitive load, prolonged glove use, carried mobile objects, self-touching, and personal behaviour patterns were potential causes for non-adherence. A purpose-designed HH concept based on these results, involving the introduction of designated objects and provider clothes to the patient zone, could improve HH adherence and microbiological safety.

摘要

背景

麻醉诱导是一项节奏快、复杂的活动,涉及大量的手与表面接触。据报道,手卫生(HH)的依从性较低,这可能导致连续患者之间病原体的传播未被察觉。

目的

研究世界卫生组织(WHO)的五个 HH 时刻概念与麻醉诱导流程的契合度。

方法

根据 WHO HH 观察方法,对 59 次麻醉诱导的视频记录进行分析,考虑到每个参与麻醉提供者的每一次手与表面接触。采用二项逻辑回归分析确定不依从的危险因素,即专业类别、性别、任务角色、手套、持物、团队规模和 HH 时刻。此外,所有视频的一半被重新录制,以对提供者自我触摸进行定量和定性分析。

结果

总体而言,105 次 HH 操作共涉及 2240 次 HH 机会(4.7%)。药物管理员角色(比值比(OR):2.2)、高级医师身份(OR:2.1)、戴手套(OR:2.6)和脱手套(OR:3.6)与更高的 HH 依从性相关。值得注意的是,47.2%的 HH 机会是由自我触摸行为引起的。提供者的衣服、脸和患者的皮肤是最常被触摸的表面。

结论

手与表面接触的密度高、认知负荷大、长时间戴手套、携带移动物品、自我触摸和个人行为模式是不依从的潜在原因。基于这些结果设计的特定 HH 概念,包括将指定物品和提供者衣服引入患者区域,可以提高 HH 依从性和微生物安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验