Section of Allergy & Immunology, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, & Critical Care Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Jun;11(6):1834-1842.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.03.003. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
The availability of asthma biologics may not benefit all patients equally.
We sought to identify patient characteristics associated with asthma biologic prescribing, primary adherence, and effectiveness.
A retrospective, observational cohort study of 9,147 adults with asthma who established care with a Penn Medicine asthma subspecialist was conducted using Electronic Health Record data from January 1, 2016, to October 18, 2021. Multivariable regression models were used to identify factors associated with (1) receipt of a new biologic prescription; (2) primary adherence, defined as receiving a dose in the year after receiving the prescription, and (3) oral corticosteroid (OCS) bursts in the year after the prescription.
Factors associated with a new prescription, which was received by 335 patients, included being a woman (odds ratio [OR] 0.66; P = .002), smoking currently (OR 0.50; P = .04), having an asthma hospitalization in the prior year (OR 2.91; P < .001), and having 4+ OCS bursts in the prior year (OR 3.01; P < .001). Reduced primary adherence was associated with Black race (incidence rate ratio 0.85; P < .001) and Medicaid insurance (incidence rate ratio 0.86; P < .001), although most in these groups, 77.6% and 74.3%, respectively, still received a dose. Nonadherence was associated with patient-level barriers in 72.2% of cases and health insurance denial in 22.2%. Having more OCS bursts after receiving a biologic prescription was associated with Medicaid insurance (OR 2.69; P = .047) and biologic days covered (OR 0.32 for 300-364 d vs 14-56 d; P = .03).
In a large health system, primary adherence to asthma biologics varied by race and insurance type, whereas nonadherence was primarily explained by patient-level barriers.
哮喘生物制剂的可及性可能并不能使所有患者同等受益。
我们旨在确定与哮喘生物制剂处方、主要依从性和疗效相关的患者特征。
这是一项回顾性、观察性队列研究,纳入了 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 10 月 18 日期间在宾夕法尼亚大学医学中心接受哮喘亚专科医生治疗的 9147 名成年哮喘患者的电子健康记录数据。使用多变量回归模型确定与以下因素相关的因素:(1)新的生物制剂处方;(2)主要依从性,定义为在收到处方后的一年内接受剂量;(3)在处方后一年内口服皮质类固醇(OCS)冲击。
在 335 名接受新处方的患者中,与处方相关的因素包括女性(比值比 [OR] 0.66;P =.002)、当前吸烟(OR 0.50;P =.04)、前一年有哮喘住院史(OR 2.91;P <.001)和前一年有 4+ OCS 冲击(OR 3.01;P <.001)。主要依从性降低与黑人种族(发病率比 0.85;P <.001)和医疗补助保险(发病率比 0.86;P <.001)相关,尽管大多数(分别为 77.6%和 74.3%)在这些群体中仍接受了剂量。72.2%的非依从性与患者层面的障碍相关,22.2%与健康保险拒绝相关。在接受生物制剂处方后,OCS 冲击次数增加与医疗补助保险(OR 2.69;P =.047)和生物制剂覆盖天数(OR 0.32 用于 300-364 d 与 14-56 d;P =.03)相关。
在一个大型医疗系统中,哮喘生物制剂的主要依从性因种族和保险类型而异,而非依从性主要由患者层面的障碍解释。