Medical Sciences College of Santos, Lusíada Foundation (UNILUS), Santos, SP, Brazil.
Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
J Affect Disord. 2023 Jun 1;330:227-238. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.02.152. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
ECT is considered the fastest and most effective treatment for TRD. Ketamine seems to be an attractive alternative due to its rapid-onset antidepressant effects and impact on suicidal thoughts. This study aimed to compare efficacy and tolerability of ECT and ketamine for different depression outcomes (PROSPERO/CRD42022349220).
We searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library and trial registries, which were the ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, without restrictions on publication date.
randomized controlled trials or cohorts comparing ketamine versus ECT in patients with TRD.
Eight studies met the inclusion criteria (of 2875 retrieved). Random-effects models comparing ketamine and ECT regarding the following outcomes were conducted: a) reduction of depressive symptoms severity through scales, g = -0.12, p = 0.68; b) response to therapy, RR = 0.89, p = 0.51; c) reported side-effects: dissociative symptoms, RR = 5.41, p = 0.06; nausea, RR = 0.73, p = 0.47; muscle pain, RR = 0.25, p = 0.02; and headache, RR = 0.39, p = 0.08. Influential & subgroup analyses were performed.
Methodological issues with high risk of bias in some of the source material, reduced number of eligible studies with high in-between heterogeneity and small sample sizes.
Our study showed no evidence to support the superiority of ketamine over ECT for severity of depressive symptoms and response to therapy. Regarding side effects, there was a statistically significant decreased risk of muscle pain in patients treated with ketamine compared to ECT.
ECT 被认为是治疗 TRD 最快、最有效的方法。由于其快速抗抑郁作用和对自杀念头的影响,氯胺酮似乎是一种有吸引力的替代方法。本研究旨在比较 ECT 和氯胺酮治疗不同抑郁结局的疗效和耐受性(PROSPERO/CRD42022349220)。
我们检索了 MEDLINE、Web of Science、Embase、PsycINFO、Google Scholar、Cochrane 图书馆和试验登记处,包括 ClinicalTrials.gov 和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台,对发表日期没有限制。
比较 TRD 患者氯胺酮与 ECT 的随机对照试验或队列研究。
纳入了 8 项研究(从 2875 项检索中)。通过比较氯胺酮和 ECT 的以下结局进行了随机效应模型分析:a)通过量表评估抑郁症状严重程度的改善,g=-0.12,p=0.68;b)治疗反应,RR=0.89,p=0.51;c)报告的副作用:分离症状,RR=5.41,p=0.06;恶心,RR=0.73,p=0.47;肌肉疼痛,RR=0.25,p=0.02;头痛,RR=0.39,p=0.08。进行了影响分析和亚组分析。
一些原始资料存在方法学问题,存在较高的偏倚风险,合格研究数量较少,异质性较高,样本量较小。
本研究结果不支持氯胺酮优于 ECT 治疗抑郁症状严重程度和治疗反应。关于副作用,与 ECT 相比,接受氯胺酮治疗的患者肌肉疼痛的风险显著降低。