Suppr超能文献

氯胺酮与电抽搐疗法治疗重性抑郁障碍的疗效和不良反应:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy and adverse effects of ketamine versus electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Medical Sciences College of Santos, Lusíada Foundation (UNILUS), Santos, SP, Brazil.

Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, PR, Brazil.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2023 Jun 1;330:227-238. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.02.152. Epub 2023 Mar 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

ECT is considered the fastest and most effective treatment for TRD. Ketamine seems to be an attractive alternative due to its rapid-onset antidepressant effects and impact on suicidal thoughts. This study aimed to compare efficacy and tolerability of ECT and ketamine for different depression outcomes (PROSPERO/CRD42022349220).

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library and trial registries, which were the ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, without restrictions on publication date.

SELECTION CRITERIA

randomized controlled trials or cohorts comparing ketamine versus ECT in patients with TRD.

RESULTS

Eight studies met the inclusion criteria (of 2875 retrieved). Random-effects models comparing ketamine and ECT regarding the following outcomes were conducted: a) reduction of depressive symptoms severity through scales, g = -0.12, p = 0.68; b) response to therapy, RR = 0.89, p = 0.51; c) reported side-effects: dissociative symptoms, RR = 5.41, p = 0.06; nausea, RR = 0.73, p = 0.47; muscle pain, RR = 0.25, p = 0.02; and headache, RR = 0.39, p = 0.08. Influential & subgroup analyses were performed.

LIMITATIONS

Methodological issues with high risk of bias in some of the source material, reduced number of eligible studies with high in-between heterogeneity and small sample sizes.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed no evidence to support the superiority of ketamine over ECT for severity of depressive symptoms and response to therapy. Regarding side effects, there was a statistically significant decreased risk of muscle pain in patients treated with ketamine compared to ECT.

摘要

背景

ECT 被认为是治疗 TRD 最快、最有效的方法。由于其快速抗抑郁作用和对自杀念头的影响,氯胺酮似乎是一种有吸引力的替代方法。本研究旨在比较 ECT 和氯胺酮治疗不同抑郁结局的疗效和耐受性(PROSPERO/CRD42022349220)。

方法

我们检索了 MEDLINE、Web of Science、Embase、PsycINFO、Google Scholar、Cochrane 图书馆和试验登记处,包括 ClinicalTrials.gov 和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台,对发表日期没有限制。

入选标准

比较 TRD 患者氯胺酮与 ECT 的随机对照试验或队列研究。

结果

纳入了 8 项研究(从 2875 项检索中)。通过比较氯胺酮和 ECT 的以下结局进行了随机效应模型分析:a)通过量表评估抑郁症状严重程度的改善,g=-0.12,p=0.68;b)治疗反应,RR=0.89,p=0.51;c)报告的副作用:分离症状,RR=5.41,p=0.06;恶心,RR=0.73,p=0.47;肌肉疼痛,RR=0.25,p=0.02;头痛,RR=0.39,p=0.08。进行了影响分析和亚组分析。

局限性

一些原始资料存在方法学问题,存在较高的偏倚风险,合格研究数量较少,异质性较高,样本量较小。

结论

本研究结果不支持氯胺酮优于 ECT 治疗抑郁症状严重程度和治疗反应。关于副作用,与 ECT 相比,接受氯胺酮治疗的患者肌肉疼痛的风险显著降低。

相似文献

3
Psychological therapies for treatment-resistant depression in adults.成人难治性抑郁症的心理治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 14;5(5):CD010558. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010558.pub2.
5
Vortioxetine for depression in adults.伏硫西汀用于成人抑郁症治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 5;7(7):CD011520. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011520.pub2.
7
Antidepressants for the treatment of depression in people with cancer.用于治疗癌症患者抑郁症的抗抑郁药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 23;4(4):CD011006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011006.pub3.
10
Pharmacological interventions for the treatment of disordered and problem gambling.药物干预治疗障碍性及问题性赌博
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 22;9(9):CD008936. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008936.pub2.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验