Manufacture of a novel cultured micellar casein concentrate ingredient for emulsifying salt-free process cheese products applications.

Micellar casein concentrate (MCC) is a high protein ingredient that is typically produced using 3 stages of microfiltration with a 3× concentration factor and diafiltration. Acid curd is an acid protein concentrate, which can be obtained by precipitating the casein at pH 4.6 (isoelectric point) using starter cultures or direct acids without the use of rennet. Process cheese product (PCP) is a dairy food prepared by blending dairy ingredients with nondairy ingredients and then heating the mixture to get a product with an extended shelf-life. Emulsifying salts are critical for the desired functional characteristics of PCP because of their role in calcium sequestration and pH adjustment. The objectives of this study were to develop a process to produce a novel cultured micellar casein concentrate ingredient (cMCC; culture-based acid curd) and to produce PCP without emulsifying salts using different combinations of protein from cMCC and MCC in the formulations (2.0:1.0, 1.9:1.1, and 1.8:1.2). Skim milk was pasteurized at 76°C for 16 s and then microfiltered in 3 microfiltration stages using graded permeability ceramic membranes to produce liquid MCC (11.15% total protein; TPr and 14.06% total solids; TS). Part of the liquid MCC was spray dried to produce MCC powder (75.77% TPr and 97.84% TS). The rest of the MCC was used to produce cMCC (86.9% TPr and 96.4% TS). Three PCP treatments were formulated with different ratios of cMCC:MCC, including 2.0:1.0, 1.9:1.1, and 1.8:1.2 on the protein basis. The composition of PCP was targeted to 19.0% protein, 45.0% moisture, 30.0% fat, and 2.4% salt. This trial was repeated 3 times using different batches of cMCC and MCC powders. All PCP were evaluated for their final functional properties. No significant differences were detected in the composition of PCP made with different ratios of cMCC and MCC except for the pH. The pH was expected to increase slightly with elevating the MCC amount in the PCP formulations. The end apparent viscosity was significantly higher in 2.0:1.0 formulation (4,305 cP) compared with 1.9:1.1 (2,408 cP) and 1.8:1.2 (2,499 cP). The hardness ranged from 407 to 512 g with no significant differences within the formulations. However, the melting temperature showed significant differences with 2.0:1.0 having the highest melting temperature (54.0°C), whereas 1.9:1.1 and 1.8:1.2 showed 43.0 and 42.0°C melting temperature, respectively. The melting diameter (38.8 to 43.9 mm) and melt area (1,183.9 to 1,538.6 mm) did not show any differences in different PCP formulations. The PCP made with a 2.0:1.0 ratio of protein from cMCC and MCC showed better functional properties compared with other formulations.