Suppr超能文献

在乳腺癌根治术后放疗中减少推量使用的实践转变:皮肤和皮下组织的剂量学研究。

The transition in practice to reduce bolus use in post-mastectomy radiotherapy: A dosimetric study of skin and subcutaneous tissue.

机构信息

Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Med Dosim. 2023;48(2):113-117. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2023.01.006. Epub 2023 Mar 10.

Abstract

To inform clinical practice for women receiving post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT), this study demonstrates the dosimetric impact of removing daily bolus on skin and subcutaneous tissue. Two planning strategies were used: clinical field-based (n = 30) and volume-based planning (n = 10). The clinical field-based plans were created with bolus and recalculated without bolus for comparison. The volume-based plans were created with bolus to ensure a minimum target coverage of the chest wall PTV and recalculated without bolus. In each scenario, the dose to superficial structures, including skin (3 mm and 5 mm) and subcutaneous tissue (a 2 mm layer, 3 mm deep from surface) were reported. Additionally, the difference in the clinically evaluated dosimetry to skin and subcutaneous tissue in volume-based plans were recalculated using Acuros (AXB) and compared to the Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) algorithm. For all treatment planning strategies, chest wall coverage (V90%) was maintained. As expected, superficial structures demonstrate significant loss in coverage. The largest difference observed in the most superficial 3 mm where V90% coverage is reduced from a mean (± standard deviation) of 95.1% (± 2.8) to 18.9% (± 5.6) for clinical field-based treatments with and without bolus, respectively. For volume-based planning, the subcutaneous tissue maintains a V90% of 90.5% (± 7.0) compared to the clinical field-based planning coverage of 84.4% (± 8.0). In all skin and subcutaneous tissue, the AAA algorithm underestimates the volume of the 90% isodose. Removing bolus results in minimal dosimetric differences in the chest wall and significantly lower skin dose while dose to the subcutaneous tissue is maintained. Unless the skin has disease involvement, the most superficial 3 mm is not considered part of the target volume. The continued use of the AAA algorithm is supported for the PMRT setting.

摘要

为了为接受乳房切除术放疗(PMRT)的女性提供临床实践依据,本研究展示了去除每日敷贴对皮肤和皮下组织的剂量学影响。使用了两种计划策略:临床基于野(n=30)和基于体积的计划(n=10)。临床基于野的计划使用敷贴创建,并为比较而重新计算不使用敷贴的计划。基于体积的计划使用敷贴创建,以确保胸壁 PTV 的最小靶区覆盖,并重新计算不使用敷贴的计划。在每种情况下,报告了包括皮肤(3 毫米和 5 毫米)和皮下组织(距表面 3 毫米深处的 2 毫米层)在内的浅层结构的剂量。此外,使用 Acuros(AXB)重新计算了基于体积的计划中皮肤和皮下组织的临床评估剂量学差异,并与各向异性解析算法(AAA)算法进行了比较。对于所有治疗计划策略,胸壁覆盖率(V90%)都得到了维持。如预期的那样,浅层结构的覆盖率显著降低。在最浅层的 3 毫米处观察到的最大差异,临床基于野治疗时,有敷贴和无敷贴的 V90%覆盖率分别从 95.1%(±2.8)降低到 18.9%(±5.6)。对于基于体积的计划,与临床基于野计划的 84.4%(±8.0)相比,皮下组织保持 90.5%(±7.0)的 V90%。在所有皮肤和皮下组织中,AAA 算法低估了 90%等剂量体积。去除敷贴可导致胸壁剂量学差异最小,皮肤剂量显著降低,而皮下组织剂量保持不变。除非皮肤有疾病累及,否则最浅层的 3 毫米不被认为是靶区的一部分。AAA 算法在 PMRT 环境中的继续使用得到了支持。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验