Suppr超能文献

对比窄带光成像和白光成像结肠镜检查对需要内镜治疗的结直肠腺瘤的检测:一项单中心随机对照试验。

Comparison of Linked Color Imaging and White Light Imaging Colonoscopy for Detection of Colorectal Adenoma Requiring Endoscopic Treatment: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Nippon Medical School Tama Nagayama Hospital.

Department of Gastroenterology, Nippon Medical School Hospital.

出版信息

J Nippon Med Sch. 2023;90(1):111-120. doi: 10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2023_90-117.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Linked color imaging (LCI) improves detection of colorectal neoplastic lesions during colonoscopy. However, polyps <5 mm in diameter often do not require resection, and the benefits of LCI are unclear for detection of colorectal polyps ≥5 mm that are indicated for endoscopic resection in clinical practice. This randomized controlled trial compared rates of detection of adenoma polyps, stratified by size, for LCI and white light imaging (WLI).

METHODS

We compared ADR (5 mm-) and PDR (5 mm-), which were defined as the proportion of patients with at least one adenoma or polyp with a diameter of 5 mm or larger in the LCI and WLI groups. Moreover, we estimated ADR and PDR for diameters between 5 and 10 mm (ADR (5-9 mm), PDR (5-9 mm) ) and for diameters larger than 10 mm (ADR (10 mm-), PDR (10 mm-) ).

RESULTS

Data from 594 patients (LCI, n=305; WLI, n=289) were analyzed. ADR (5 mm-) and PDR (5 mm-) were significantly higher in the LCI group than in the WLI group (ADR (5 mm-): P=0.016, PDR (5 mm-): P=0.020). In the assessment of adenoma and polyp size, ADR (5-9 mm) and PDR (5-9 mm) were significantly higher in the LCI group than in the WLI group, although no significant differences were seen in ADR (10 mm-) and PDR (10 mm-) between these groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Polyps ≥5 mm, which are indicated for endoscopic treatment, were more easily visualized with LCI mode than with WLI mode. The improvement in detection rate was obvious for polyps <10 mm, which are easier to miss.

摘要

背景

联合显色成像(LCI)可提高结肠镜检查中结直肠肿瘤性病变的检出率。然而,直径<5mm 的息肉通常不需要切除,对于临床实践中需要内镜切除的直径≥5mm 的结直肠息肉,LCI 的益处尚不清楚。本随机对照试验比较了 LCI 与白光成像(WLI)对不同大小腺瘤性息肉的检出率。

方法

我们比较了 LCI 和 WLI 组中直径<5mm 的腺瘤性息肉(ADR(5mm-))和直径≥5mm 的息肉(PDR(5mm-))的检出率。此外,我们还估计了直径在 5-10mm 之间(ADR(5-9mm),PDR(5-9mm))和直径>10mm 之间(ADR(10mm-),PDR(10mm-))的 ADR 和 PDR。

结果

共分析了 594 例患者(LCI 组 305 例,WLI 组 289 例)的数据。LCI 组的 ADR(5mm-)和 PDR(5mm-)均显著高于 WLI 组(ADR(5mm-):P=0.016,PDR(5mm-):P=0.020)。在评估腺瘤和息肉大小方面,LCI 组的 ADR(5-9mm)和 PDR(5-9mm)均显著高于 WLI 组,尽管两组间 ADR(10mm-)和 PDR(10mm-)无显著差异。

结论

与 WLI 模式相比,LCI 模式更容易观察到≥5mm 的息肉,这些息肉需要进行内镜治疗。对于<10mm 的息肉,其检出率的提高更为明显,因为这些息肉更容易被遗漏。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验