Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Aug;19(8):1708-1716.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.04.004. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
A higher adenoma detection rate (ADR) has been shown to be related to a lower incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer. We analyzed the efficacy of linked color imaging (LCI) by assessing the detection, miss, and visibility of various featured adenomas as compared with white light imaging (WLI).
This was a prospective, randomized, tandem trial. The participants were randomly assigned to 2 groups: first observation by LCI, then second observation by WLI (LCI group); or both observations by WLI (WLI group). Suspected neoplastic lesions were resected after magnifying image-enhanced endoscopy. The primary outcome was to compare the ADR during the first observation. Secondary outcomes included evaluation of adenoma miss rate (AMR) and visibility score.
A total of 780 patients were randomized, 700 of whom were included in the final analysis. The ADR was 69.6% and 63.2% in the LCI and WLI groups, respectively, with no significant difference. However, LCI improved the average ADR in low-detectors compared with high-detectors (76.0% vs 55.1%; P < .001). Total AMR was 20.6% in the LCI group, which was significantly lower than that in the WLI group (31.1%) (P < .001). AMR in the LCI group was significantly lower, especially for diminutive adenomas (23.4% vs 35.1%; P < .001) and nonpolypoid lesions (25.6% vs 37.9%; P < .001) compared with the WLI group.
Although both methods provided a similar ADR, LCI had a lower AMR than WLI. LCI could benefit endoscopists with lower ADR, an observation that warrants additional study. (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, Number: UMIN000026359).
较高的腺瘤检出率(ADR)与结直肠癌的发病率和死亡率降低有关。我们通过比较链接彩色成像(LCI)与白光成像(WLI)对各种特征性腺瘤的检测、遗漏和可视性,分析了 LCI 的效果。
这是一项前瞻性、随机、串联试验。参与者被随机分配到 2 组:首先观察 LCI,然后观察 WLI(LCI 组);或两次均观察 WLI(WLI 组)。对疑似肿瘤性病变进行放大图像增强内镜检查后切除。主要结局是比较首次观察时的 ADR。次要结局包括评估腺瘤遗漏率(AMR)和可视性评分。
共有 780 名患者被随机分组,其中 700 名患者纳入最终分析。LCI 组和 WLI 组的 ADR 分别为 69.6%和 63.2%,无显著差异。然而,LCI 提高了低检出者的平均 ADR,与高检出者相比(76.0% vs 55.1%;P <.001)。LCI 组的总 AMR 为 20.6%,明显低于 WLI 组(31.1%)(P <.001)。LCI 组的 AMR 明显更低,尤其是微小腺瘤(23.4% vs 35.1%)和非息肉样病变(25.6% vs 37.9%)(P <.001)。
虽然两种方法的 ADR 相似,但 LCI 的 AMR 低于 WLI。LCI 可能使 ADR 较低的内镜医生受益,这一观察结果值得进一步研究。(UMIN 临床试验注册,编号:UMIN000026359)。