[Relationship between radiation knowledge and radiation effect anxiety on the next generation: An analysis of a questionnaire survey disseminated to residents in Fukushima Prefecture].

Objectives　Since the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident caused by the Great East Japan Earthquake, many people in Fukushima Prefecture have been concerned about the effects of radiation on their offspring. Although this fear should be relieved since no epidemiological study has shown evidential cases, situations wherein some people misunderstood the existence of evidence have been independently reported. Therefore, in this study, we examined the relationship between radiation knowledge and anxiety about radiation-based genetic effects using a survey mailed to residents in Fukushima Prefecture.Methods　In August 2016, we attempted to contact 2,000 people aged 20 to 79 years in Fukushima Prefecture through a survey distributed by mail inquiring about residents' health. We received 861 responses. Respondents selected their level of concern about radiation effects on the next generation on a four-point scale and answered five knowledge questions about radiation effects and protection. Responses were "correct," "incorrect," or "not sure." After adjusting according to residential area, family configuration, age, sex, academic background, media used, and trusted information source, we conducted multiple regression analyses to investigate the relationship between the level of concern and answers to the knowledge questions.Results　People who answered the knowledge questions more correctly had lower levels of anxiety. The number of "not sure" responses was unrelated to anxiety level. The results indicated that correct answers to questions related to radiation residuals in the body and genetic effects were negatively associated with anxiety. Incorrect answers to the question about genetic effects and another related to cell repair systems were positively associated with anxiety. Moreover, while a correct answer to another question related to the linear threshold model had a positive association, the association was insignificant. Further, any response related to radiation reference values in foods showed no association.Conclusion　Based on these results, we observed an association between the number of respondents with a correct knowledge of radiation and the degree of anxiety about radiation effects on the next generation. However, this relationship and its strength varied depending on the specific knowledge content. As a limitation of this study, the study could not establish any causality. Further studies, such as prospective interventional studies, should be conducted.