Caba Octavio, Diéguez-Castillo Carmelo, Martínez-Galán Joaquina, González-Cebrián Irene, Jiménez-Luna Cristina
Institute of Biopathology and Regenerative Medicine (IBIMER), University of Granada, Granada 18016, Spain.
Biosanitary Institute of Granada (ibs.GRANADA), 18014 Granada, Spain.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023 Feb 15;15(2):268-275. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i2.268.
Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), a chronic inflammation caused by the immune system attacking the pancreas, usually presents imaging and clinical features that overlap with those of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Serum biomarkers, substances that quantitatively change in sera during disease development, are a promising non-invasive tool with high utility for differentiating between these diseases. In this way, the presence of AIP is currently suspected when serum concentrations of immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) antibody are elevated. However, this approach has some drawbacks. Notably, IgG4 antibody concentrations are also elevated in sera from some patients with PDAC. This review focuses on the most recent and relevant serum biomarkers proposed to differentiate between AIP and PDAC, evaluating the usefulness of immunoglobulins, autoantibodies, chemokines, and cytokines. The proposed serum biomarkers have proven useful, although most studies had a small sample size, did not examine their presence in patients with PDAC, or did not test them in humans. In addition, current evidence suggests that a single serum biomarker is unlikely to accurately differentiate these diseases and that a set of biomarkers will be needed to achieve adequate specificity and sensitivity, either alone or in combination with clinical data and/or radiological images.
自身免疫性胰腺炎(AIP)是一种由免疫系统攻击胰腺引起的慢性炎症,通常呈现出与胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)重叠的影像学和临床特征。血清生物标志物是在疾病发展过程中血清中定量变化的物质,是一种很有前景的非侵入性工具,在区分这些疾病方面具有很高的实用性。通过这种方式,当血清免疫球蛋白G4(IgG4)抗体浓度升高时,目前怀疑存在AIP。然而,这种方法有一些缺点。值得注意的是,一些PDAC患者的血清中IgG4抗体浓度也会升高。本综述重点关注为区分AIP和PDAC而提出的最新且相关的血清生物标志物,评估免疫球蛋白、自身抗体、趋化因子和细胞因子的实用性。尽管大多数研究样本量较小,未检测PDAC患者中这些标志物的存在情况,或未在人体中进行测试,但所提出的血清生物标志物已被证明是有用的。此外,目前的证据表明,单一血清生物标志物不太可能准确区分这些疾病,需要一组生物标志物来实现足够的特异性和敏感性,单独使用或与临床数据和/或放射影像相结合。