Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS), Center for Health Professions Education, Department of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Department of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2024 Sep;29(4):1481-1500. doi: 10.1007/s10459-023-10310-2. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
The concepts of metacognitive reflection, reflection, and metacognition are distinct but have undergone shifts in meaning as they migrated into medical education. Conceptual clarity is essential to the construction of the knowledge base of medical education and its educational interventions. We conducted a theoretical integrative review across diverse bodies of literature with the goal of understanding what metacognitive reflection is. We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsychInfo, and Web of Science databases, including all peer-reviewed research articles and theoretical papers as well as book chapters that addressed the topic, with no limitations for date, language, or location. A total of 733 articles were identified and 87 were chosen after careful review and application of exclusion criteria. The work of conceptually and empirically delineating metacognitive reflection has begun. Contributions have been made to root metacognitive reflection in the concept of metacognition and moving beyond it to engage in cycles of reflection. Other work has underscored its affective component, transformational nature, and contextual factors. Despite this merging of threads to develop a richer conceptualization, a theory of how metacognitive reflection works is elusive. Debates address whether metacognition drives reflection or vice versa. It has also been suggested that learners evolve along on a continuum from thinking, to task-related reflection, to self-reflection, and finally to metacognitive reflection. Based on prior theory and research, as well as the findings of this review, we propose the following conceptualization: Metacognitive reflection involves heightened internal observation, awareness, monitoring, and regulation of our own knowledge, experiences, and emotions by questioning and examining cognition and emotional processes to continually refine and enhance our perspectives and decisions while thoughtfully accounting for context. We argue that metacognitive reflection brings a shift in perspective and can support valuable reconceptualization for lifelong learning.
元认知反思、反思和元认知的概念是不同的,但随着它们迁移到医学教育中,其含义发生了变化。概念的清晰性对于构建医学教育的知识库及其教育干预措施至关重要。我们进行了一项跨不同文献的理论综合评价,旨在了解元认知反思的本质。我们搜索了 PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、PsychInfo 和 Web of Science 数据库,包括所有同行评议的研究文章和理论论文以及涉及该主题的章节,没有对日期、语言或地点进行限制。共确定了 733 篇文章,经过仔细审查和应用排除标准后,选择了 87 篇文章。元认知反思的概念和实证划分工作已经开始。在将元认知反思植根于元认知概念并超越它以进行反思循环方面做出了贡献。其他工作强调了其情感成分、变革性质和情境因素。尽管这些线程融合在一起以形成更丰富的概念化,但元认知反思如何运作的理论仍然难以捉摸。争论涉及元认知是否驱动反思,或者反之亦然。也有人建议,学习者沿着一个连续体从思考、与任务相关的反思、自我反思,最终发展到元认知反思。基于先前的理论和研究,以及本综述的结果,我们提出了以下概念化:元认知反思涉及增强对我们自己的知识、经验和情绪的内部观察、意识、监控和调节,通过质疑和检查认知和情感过程来不断完善和增强我们的观点和决策,同时考虑到背景。我们认为,元认知反思带来了视角的转变,可以支持终身学习的有价值的重新概念化。