方案：评估暴力激进化风险的工具是否适用？一项系统综述。
PROTOCOL: Are tools that assess risk of violent radicalization fit for purpose? A systematic review.
作者信息
Hassan Ghayda, Brouillette-Alarie Sébastien, Ousman Sarah, Madriaza Pablo, Varela Wynnpaul, Danis Emmanuel, Kilinc Deniz, Pickup David, Borokhovski Eugene
机构信息
Department of Psychology Université du Québec à Montréal (UQÀM) Montréal Quebec Canada.
Department of Education Concordia University Montreal Quebec Canada.
出版信息
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 7;18(4):e1279. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1279. eCollection 2022 Dec.
Abstract
This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The main objective of this project is to gather, critically appraise, and synthesize evidence about the appropriateness and utility of tools used to assess the risk of violent radicalization.
摘要
这是一项坎贝尔系统评价的方案。该项目的主要目标是收集、严格评估并综合有关用于评估暴力激进化风险的工具的适用性和效用的证据。
相似文献
1
PROTOCOL: Are tools that assess risk of violent radicalization fit for purpose? A systematic review.方案：评估暴力激进化风险的工具是否适用？一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 7;18(4):e1279. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1279. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Transnational evaluation of the Sympathy for Violent Radicalization Scale: Measuring population attitudes toward violent radicalization in two countries.跨国评估同情暴力极端主义量表：在两个国家衡量民众对暴力极端化的态度。
Transcult Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;58(5):669-682. doi: 10.1177/13634615211000550. Epub 2021 May 14.
3
Disentangling Support for Violent and Non-violent Radicalization among Adolescents: A Latent Profile Analysis.青少年暴力和非暴力激进化支持的解析：潜在剖面分析。
J Youth Adolesc. 2024 Sep;53(9):1953-1970. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-01988-7. Epub 2024 May 3.
4
Violent Radicalization and Post-traumatic Dissociation: Clinical Case of a Young Adolescent Girl Radicalized.暴力激进化与创伤后解离：一名激进化年轻少女的临床病例
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 22;13:793291. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.793291. eCollection 2022.
5
Radicalization to Violence: A View from Cultural Psychiatry.激进化走向暴力：文化精神病学的视角。
Transcult Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;58(5):603-615. doi: 10.1177/13634615211048010. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
6
PROTOCOL: Is radicalization a family issue? A systematic review of family-related risk and protective factors, consequences, and interventions against radicalization.方案：激进化是一个家庭问题吗？对与家庭相关的激进化风险和保护因素、后果及干预措施的系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 26;17(3):e1190. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1190. eCollection 2021 Sep.
7
Collective identity, social adversity and college student sympathy for violent radicalization.集体认同、社会逆境与大学生对暴力激进化的同情
Transcult Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;58(5):654-668. doi: 10.1177/1363461519853653. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
8
Capturing violent radicalization: Developing and validating scales measuring central aspects of radicalization.捕捉暴力激进化：开发并验证衡量激进化核心方面的量表。
Scand J Psychol. 2018 Dec;59(6):653-660. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12484. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
9
Sympathy-Empathy and the Radicalization of Young People.同情-同理心与年轻人的激进化
Children (Basel). 2022 Dec 2;9(12):1889. doi: 10.3390/children9121889.
10
And if there were another way out? Questioning the prevalent radicalization models.如果还有其他出路呢？质疑流行的激进化模式。
Can J Public Health. 2018 Jan 22;108(5-6):e633-e635. doi: 10.17269/cjph.108.6233.
引用本文的文献
1
PROTOCOL: Case management interventions seeking to counter radicalisation to violence: A systematic review of tools and approaches.方案：旨在应对激进化至暴力行为的案例管理干预措施：工具与方法的系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 5;19(1):e1301. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1301. eCollection 2023 Mar.
本文引用的文献
1
A systematic review on the relationship between mental health, radicalization and mass violence.关于心理健康、激进化和大规模暴力之间关系的系统综述。
Eur Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;56:51-59. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
2
The Operational Development and Empirical Testing of the Terrorist Radicalization Assessment Protocol (TRAP-18).《恐怖主义激进化评估协议（TRAP-18）的操作开发与实证检验》。
J Pers Assess. 2018 Sep-Oct;100(5):483-492. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1481077. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
3
COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study.COSMIN 方法学用于评估患者报告结局测量的内容效度：一项德尔菲研究。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1159-1170. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
4
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures.COSMIN 患者报告结局测量系统评价指南。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1147-1157. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
5
COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.COSMIN 患者报告结局测量系统评价偏倚风险清单。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1171-1179. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
6
Terrorism, Radicalisation, Extremism, Authoritarianism and Fundamentalism: A Systematic Review of the Quality and Psychometric Properties of Assessments.恐怖主义、激进化、极端主义、威权主义与原教旨主义：评估质量及心理测量特性的系统综述
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 21;11(12):e0166947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166947. eCollection 2016.
7
Varying coefficient meta-analytic methods for alpha reliability.变系数元分析方法用于 alpha 可靠性。
Psychol Methods. 2010 Dec;15(4):368-85. doi: 10.1037/a0020142.
8
Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START): The case for a new structured professional judgment scheme.短期风险与可治疗性评估（START）：一种新型结构化专业判断方案的依据
Behav Sci Law. 2006;24(6):747-66. doi: 10.1002/bsl.737.
9
Effect sizes in the treatment of sexual offenders.性犯罪者治疗中的效应量。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2003 Dec;47(6):653-63. doi: 10.1177/0306624X03256663.
10
Clinical versus mechanical prediction: a meta-analysis.临床预测与机械预测：一项荟萃分析。
Psychol Assess. 2000 Mar;12(1):19-30.
Zotero 插件