Leimgruber Peter, Songsasen Nucharin, Stabach Jared A, Horning Megan, Reed Dolores, Buk Tara, Harwood Arielle, Layman Lawrence, Mathews Christopher, Vance Morgan, Marinari Paul, Helmick Kelly E, Delaski Kristina M, Ware Lisa H, Jones Julia C, Silva Jose L P, Laske Timothy G, Moraes Rosana Nogueira
Conservation Ecology Center, Smithsonian National Zoo & Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, VA, United States.
Center for Species Survival, Smithsonian National Zoo & Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, VA, United States.
Front Physiol. 2023 Feb 24;14:1079008. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1079008. eCollection 2023.
Heart rate biologging has been successfully used to study wildlife responses to natural and human-caused stressors (e.g., hunting, landscape of fear). Although rarely deployed to inform conservation, heart rate biologging may be particularly valuable for assessing success in wildlife reintroductions. We conducted a case study for testing and validating the use of subcutaneous heart rate monitors in eight captive scimitar-horned oryx (), a once-extinct species that is currently being restored to the wild. We evaluated biologger safety and accuracy while collecting long-term baseline data and assessing factors explaining variation in heart rate. None of the biologgers were rejected after implantation, with successful data capture for 16-21 months. Heart rate detection accuracy was high (83%-99%) for six of the individuals with left lateral placement of the biologgers. We excluded data from two individuals with a right lateral placement because accuracies were below 60%. Average heart rate for the six scimitar-horned oryx was 60.3 ± 12.7 bpm, and varied by about 12 bpm between individuals, with a minimum of 31 bpm and a maximum of 188 bpm across individuals. Scimitar-horned oryx displayed distinct circadian rhythms in heart rate and activity. Heart rate and activity were low early in the morning and peaked near dusk. Circadian rhythm in heart rate and activity were relatively unchanged across season, but hourly averages for heart rate and activity were higher in spring and summer, respectively. Variation in hourly heart rate averages was best explained by a combination of activity, hour, astronomical season, ambient temperature, and an interaction term for hour and season. Increases in activity appeared to result in the largest changes in heart rate. We concluded that biologgers are safe and accurate and can be deployed in free-ranging and reintroduced scimitar-horned oryx. In addition to current monitoring practices of reintroduced scimitar-horned oryx, the resulting biologging data could significantly aid in 1) evaluating care and management action prior to release, 2) characterizing different animal personalities and how these might affect reintroduction outcomes for individual animals, and 3) identifying stressors after release to determine their timing, duration, and impact on released animals. Heart rate monitoring in released scimitar-horned oryx may also aid in advancing our knowledge about how desert ungulates adapt to extreme environmental variation in their habitats (e.g., heat, drought).
心率生物记录法已成功用于研究野生动物对自然和人为应激源(如狩猎、恐惧景观)的反应。尽管很少用于为保护工作提供信息,但心率生物记录法对于评估野生动物重新引入的成功率可能特别有价值。我们进行了一项案例研究,以测试和验证皮下心率监测器在八只圈养的弯刀角大羚羊(一种曾经灭绝但目前正在恢复到野外的物种)中的使用。我们在收集长期基线数据并评估解释心率变化的因素时,评估了生物记录器的安全性和准确性。植入后没有一个生物记录器被拒收,成功捕获数据的时间为16 - 21个月。对于六个生物记录器放置在左侧的个体,心率检测准确率很高(83% - 99%)。我们排除了两个生物记录器放置在右侧的个体的数据,因为准确率低于60%。六只弯刀角大羚羊的平均心率为60.3±12.7次/分钟,个体之间的心率变化约为12次/分钟,个体心率范围为31次/分钟至188次/分钟。弯刀角大羚羊在心率和活动方面表现出明显的昼夜节律。心率和活动在清晨较低,在黄昏附近达到峰值。心率和活动的昼夜节律在不同季节相对不变,但心率和活动的每小时平均值在春季和夏季分别较高。每小时平均心率的变化最好由活动、时间、天文季节、环境温度以及时间和季节的交互项共同解释。活动增加似乎导致心率变化最大。我们得出结论,生物记录器是安全且准确的,可部署在自由放养和重新引入的弯刀角大羚羊中。除了目前对重新引入的弯刀角大羚羊的监测方法外,由此产生的生物记录数据可以显著帮助:1)在放生前评估护理和管理行动;2)描述不同的动物个性以及这些个性如何可能影响个体动物的重新引入结果;3)在放归后识别应激源,以确定其时间、持续时间以及对放归动物的影响。对放归的弯刀角大羚羊进行心率监测也可能有助于增进我们对沙漠有蹄类动物如何适应其栖息地极端环境变化(如炎热、干旱)的了解。