• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

层流空气流动装置与传统刷手法在白内障手术中的有效性和安全性：一项为期1年的非劣效性试点研究。

Effectiveness and safety of cataract surgery in laminar air flow device versus traditional scrubs: A 1-year non-inferiority pilot study.

作者信息

Artus Arnaud, Fabro Filippo, Cochereau Isabelle, Caputo Georges, Tadayoni Ramin, Vignal Catherine, Galatoire Olivier, Salviat Flore, Gatinel Damien, Panthier Christophe

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris, France.

Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Feb 23;10:987505. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.987505. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2023.987505
PMID:36910482
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9995367/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The study aimed to assess the safety and the non-inferiority of cataract surgery outside an operating room using the Surgicube, a mobile laminar airflow (LAF) device.

SETTINGS

This single-center study was conducted at the Rothschild Foundation, Paris, France.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective cross-sectional study.

METHODS

All patients operated on for cataracts using the Surgicube between February 2020 and February 2021 were included and controlled by a cohort of patients operated on for cataracts in the traditional theater during the same period. Patients with a postoperative follow-up of less than 1 month were excluded. Data collection was carried out using the patient's medical record. The primary endpoint was the evaluation of the number of endophthalmitis in the two groups. The secondary judgment criteria were the analysis of the various complications and the Logmar visual acuity at 1 month in the two groups. All the patients underwent an OCT retinal examination.

RESULTS

A total of 923 randomized patients who underwent cataract surgery between 2020 and 2021 have been included in the study. Among them, 448 patients were operated on using the Surgicube, and 475 patients underwent surgery in the traditional operating room using the same lens phacoemulsification technique. There are no significant differences between the two groups ( > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Cataract surgery using the Surgicube outside a conventional operating room seems non-inferior to conventional scrub.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估使用移动层流气流（LAF）设备Surgicube在手术室以外进行白内障手术的安全性和非劣效性。

设置

本单中心研究在法国巴黎的罗斯柴尔德基金会进行。

设计

这是一项回顾性横断面研究。

方法

纳入2020年2月至2021年2月期间使用Surgicube进行白内障手术的所有患者，并与同期在传统手术室进行白内障手术的一组患者进行对照。排除术后随访时间少于1个月的患者。使用患者病历进行数据收集。主要终点是评估两组眼内炎的数量。次要判断标准是分析两组的各种并发症以及1个月时的Logmar视力。所有患者均接受了OCT视网膜检查。

结果

共有923例在2020年至2021年期间接受白内障手术的随机分组患者纳入本研究。其中，448例患者使用Surgicube进行手术，475例患者在传统手术室使用相同的晶状体超声乳化技术进行手术。两组之间无显著差异（>0.05）。

结论

在传统手术室以外使用Surgicube进行白内障手术似乎不劣于传统手术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fba0/9995367/d7fad7d9492d/fmed-10-987505-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fba0/9995367/d7fad7d9492d/fmed-10-987505-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fba0/9995367/d7fad7d9492d/fmed-10-987505-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness and safety of cataract surgery in laminar air flow device versus traditional scrubs: A 1-year non-inferiority pilot study.层流空气流动装置与传统刷手法在白内障手术中的有效性和安全性：一项为期1年的非劣效性试点研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Feb 23;10:987505. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.987505. eCollection 2023.
2
Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery compared with phacoemulsification: the FACT non-inferiority RCT.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与超声乳化白内障吸除术的比较：FACT 非劣效性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Jan;25(6):1-68. doi: 10.3310/hta25060.
3
Purifying air over the operating field with a new mobile laminar airflow device to reduce the possibility of airborne contamination.使用新型移动层流空气净化设备净化手术区域空气，降低空气传播污染的可能性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 Oct 1;47(10):1327-1332. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000613.
4
Are high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters and laminar air flow necessary in operating rooms to control acute post-operative endophthalmitis?手术室中是否需要高效空气过滤器（HEPA）和层流来控制急性术后眼内炎？
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun;68(6):1120-1125. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1493_19.
5
Endophthalmitis after intravitreal injections versus cataract surgery: a 15-year cohort.玻璃体腔内注射与白内障手术后的眼内炎：一项15年队列研究。
Int Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan;40(1):73-79. doi: 10.1007/s10792-019-01153-1. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
6
Cost-effectiveness of immediate versus delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery in the Netherlands (the BICAT-NL study): study design of a prospective multicenter randomised controlled trial.荷兰即刻与延迟序贯双侧白内障手术的成本效益比较（BICAT-NL 研究）：一项前瞻性多中心随机对照试验的研究设计。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun 29;20(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01521-x.
7
Combined surgery versus cataract surgery alone for eyes with cataract and glaucoma.白内障合并青光眼患者联合手术与单纯白内障手术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 14;2015(7):CD008671. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008671.pub3.
8
Different-sized incisions for phacoemulsification in age-related cataract.年龄相关性白内障超声乳化手术中不同大小切口的研究
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 20;9(9):CD010510. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010510.pub2.
9
Manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) with posterior chamber intraocular lens versus phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens for age-related cataract.手动小切口白内障手术（MSICS）联合后房型人工晶状体与超声乳化白内障吸除术联合后房型人工晶状体治疗年龄相关性白内障的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 10;2013(10):CD008813. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008813.pub2.
10
Intraocular lens optic edge design for the prevention of posterior capsule opacification after cataract surgery.白内障手术后预防后囊膜混浊的人工晶状体光学边缘设计。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 16;8(8):CD012516. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012516.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond the microscope: embracing soft skills in ophthalmology for enhanced patient care and clinician well-being.超越显微镜：在眼科领域掌握软技能以提升患者护理水平和临床医生的幸福感。
Eye (Lond). 2024 Sep;38(13):2485-2487. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03080-7. Epub 2024 Apr 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Purifying air over the operating field with a new mobile laminar airflow device to reduce the possibility of airborne contamination.使用新型移动层流空气净化设备净化手术区域空气，降低空气传播污染的可能性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 Oct 1;47(10):1327-1332. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000613.
2
Intravitreal Injections in Arc Sterile Setting: Safety Profile after More Than 10,000 Treatments.无菌环境下玻璃体内注射：超过10000次治疗后的安全性概况。
J Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr 15;2020:3680406. doi: 10.1155/2020/3680406. eCollection 2020.
3
Cataracts.
白内障。
Lancet. 2017 Aug 5;390(10094):600-612. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30544-5. Epub 2017 Feb 25.
4
Patient Experience With Office-Based Corneal Transplantation.基于门诊的角膜移植患者体验
Cornea. 2017 Apr;36(4):445-447. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001149.
5
Methodology for analyzing environmental quality indicators in a dynamic operating room environment.动态手术室环境中环境质量指标的分析方法
Am J Infect Control. 2017 Apr 1;45(4):354-359. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
6
Cataract surgery in mobile eye surgical unit: Safe and viable alternative.流动眼科手术单元中的白内障手术：安全且可行的替代方案。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2016 Nov;64(11):835-839. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.195599.
7
Office-Based Cataract Surgery: Population Health Outcomes Study of More than 21 000 Cases in the United States.基于门诊的白内障手术：美国超过 21000 例的人群健康结果研究。
Ophthalmology. 2016 Apr;123(4):723-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.12.020. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
8
Is a mobile surgical bus a safe setting for cataract surgery? A four-year retrospective study of intraoperative complications.流动手术巴士是白内障手术的安全场所吗？一项关于术中并发症的四年回顾性研究。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 Apr;40(3):330-1. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2011.02615.x.
9
Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002.2002年全球视力损害数据。
Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Nov;82(11):844-51. Epub 2004 Dec 14.
10
The addition of a mobile ultra-clean exponential laminar airflow screen to conventional operating room ventilation reduces bacterial contamination to operating box levels.在传统手术室通风系统中添加一个可移动的超净指数层流气流屏障，可将细菌污染降低至手术箱水平。
J Hosp Infect. 2003 Oct;55(2):92-7. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(03)00143-9.