• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

行动中的足迹:弗吉尼亚大学如何管理其可持续发展工作

Footprints in Action: How UVA Is Managing Its Sustainability Stewardship.

作者信息

Dukes Elizabeth, Cheng Selina, Mogen Samuel, Galloway James, Leach Allison, Trimble Andrea Ruedy, Pettit Andrew, Compton Jana, Pennino Michael

机构信息

Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.

Sustainability Institute, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, USA.

出版信息

Sustain Clim Chang. 2023 Feb 1;16(1):48-63. doi: 10.1089/scc.2022.0067. Epub 2023 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1089/scc.2022.0067
PMID:36910689
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9994435/
Abstract

Evaluating sustainability stewardship at higher educational institutions is essential to working towards improving our environment. Many institutions have used environmental footprint indicators as a way to evaluate, track, and improve their impact on the environment. In this article, we present the web-based Integrated Environmental Footprint Tool (IEFT), which allows users to test how changes in certain activities impact nitrogen (N), greenhouse gases (GHG), phosphorus (P), and water (W) footprints for a university campus. This study uses the University of Virginia (UVA) as a model to show the impacts of their existing sustainability plans on multiple footprint indicators. Strategies from the University of Virginia's (UVA) two exisiting action plans, the GHG Action Plan and the N Action Plan, are evaluated to determine their impact on each of the footprints (GHG, N, P, and W). Based on the 2025 goal year, the strategies in these action plans are estimated to reduce the GHG, N, P, and W footprints by -38%, 32%, 25%, and 2.7% respectively. The damage costs associated with GHG and N footprints are assessed and reveal a 38 percent reduction in damage costs for GHG and a 42 percent reduction in costs for N. Using the IEFT to evaluate the impact of these action plan strategies, UVA optimized environmental outcomes. The model shown here can be used at other institutions to evaluate the environmental impact of planned changes to an institutions' operations.

摘要

评估高等教育机构的可持续发展管理对于致力于改善我们的环境至关重要。许多机构已将环境足迹指标作为评估、跟踪和改善其对环境影响的一种方式。在本文中,我们介绍了基于网络的综合环境足迹工具(IEFT),该工具可让用户测试某些活动的变化如何影响大学校园的氮(N)、温室气体(GHG)、磷(P)和水(W)足迹。本研究以弗吉尼亚大学(UVA)为模型,展示其现有可持续发展计划对多个足迹指标的影响。对弗吉尼亚大学(UVA)现有的两项行动计划,即温室气体行动计划和氮行动计划中的策略进行评估,以确定它们对每个足迹(温室气体、氮、磷和水)的影响。基于2025年目标年份,这些行动计划中的策略预计将分别使温室气体、氮、磷和水足迹减少-38%、32%、25%和2.7%。对与温室气体和氮足迹相关的损害成本进行了评估,结果显示温室气体损害成本降低了38%,氮成本降低了42%。通过使用IEFT评估这些行动计划策略的影响,弗吉尼亚大学优化了环境成果。此处展示的模型可用于其他机构,以评估机构运营计划变更对环境的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7741/9994435/9ed4028eee7b/scc.2022.0067_figure6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7741/9994435/bde6c50088a2/scc.2022.0067_figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7741/9994435/f64538ddfe23/scc.2022.0067_figure2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7741/9994435/4a42cc538a65/scc.2022.0067_figure3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7741/9994435/3ef0866551fa/scc.2022.0067_figure4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7741/9994435/4fbc367b36cf/scc.2022.0067_figure5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7741/9994435/9ed4028eee7b/scc.2022.0067_figure6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7741/9994435/bde6c50088a2/scc.2022.0067_figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7741/9994435/f64538ddfe23/scc.2022.0067_figure2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7741/9994435/4a42cc538a65/scc.2022.0067_figure3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7741/9994435/3ef0866551fa/scc.2022.0067_figure4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7741/9994435/4fbc367b36cf/scc.2022.0067_figure5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7741/9994435/9ed4028eee7b/scc.2022.0067_figure6.jpg

相似文献

1
Footprints in Action: How UVA Is Managing Its Sustainability Stewardship.行动中的足迹:弗吉尼亚大学如何管理其可持续发展工作
Sustain Clim Chang. 2023 Feb 1;16(1):48-63. doi: 10.1089/scc.2022.0067. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
2
Assessing the Social and Environmental Costs of Institution Nitrogen Footprints.评估机构氮足迹的社会和环境成本。
Sustainability (New Rochelle). 2017 Apr 1;10(2):114-122. doi: 10.1089/sus.2017.29099.jec.
3
Comparing Institution Nitrogen Footprints: Metrics for Assessing and Tracking Environmental Impact.比较机构氮足迹:评估和跟踪环境影响的指标
Sustainability (New Rochelle). 2017 Apr 1;10(2):105-113. doi: 10.1089/sus.2017.29090.eac.
4
An Integrated Tool for Calculating and Reducing Institution Carbon and Nitrogen Footprints.一种用于计算和减少机构碳足迹和氮足迹的综合工具。
Sustainability (New Rochelle). 2017 Apr 1;10(2):140-148. doi: 10.1089/sus.2017.29092.aml.
5
LIFE BEEF CARBON: a common framework for quantifying grass and corn based beef farms' carbon footprints.生命牛肉碳:一种用于量化草饲和谷饲牛肉农场碳足迹的通用框架。
Animal. 2020 Apr;14(4):834-845. doi: 10.1017/S1751731119002519. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
6
The Nitrogen Footprint Tool Network: A Multi-Institution Program To Reduce Nitrogen Pollution.氮足迹工具网络:一项减少氮污染的多机构计划。
Sustainability (New Rochelle). 2017 Apr 1;10(2):79-88. doi: 10.1089/sus.2017.29098.eac.
7
Integrating the inter- and intra-annual dynamic features of capital into environmental footprint assessment: Revisiting China's greenhouse gas footprints, 1995-2015.将资本的跨年度和年度内动态特征纳入环境足迹评估:重新审视中国 1995-2015 年的温室气体足迹。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Dec 20;801:149629. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149629. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
8
Greenhouse gas emissions and reactive nitrogen releases during the life-cycles of staple food production in China and their mitigation potential.中国主要粮食生产生命周期中的温室气体排放与活性氮释放及其减排潜力
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Jun 15;556:116-25. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.204. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
9
Exploring the environmental impact of crop production in China using a comprehensive footprint approach.运用综合足迹法探究中国农作物生产的环境影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jun 10;824:153898. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153898. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
10
A case study of the carbon footprint of milk from high-performing confinement and grass-based dairy farms.高产封闭式奶牛场和草地奶牛场牛奶碳足迹的案例研究。
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Mar;97(3):1835-51. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7174. Epub 2014 Jan 17.

本文引用的文献

1
The U.S. consumer phosphorus footprint: where do nitrogen and phosphorus diverge?美国消费者的磷足迹:氮和磷的差异在哪里?
Environ Res Lett. 2020 Oct 13;15:1-15. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aba781.
2
Carbon footprint in Higher Education Institutions: a literature review and prospects for future research.高等教育机构的碳足迹:文献综述与未来研究展望
Clean Technol Environ Policy. 2021;23(9):2523-2542. doi: 10.1007/s10098-021-02180-2. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
3
City footprints and SDGs provide untapped potential for assessing city sustainability.
城市足迹与可持续发展目标为评估城市可持续性提供了尚未开发的潜力。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jun 18;12(1):3758. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23968-2.
4
Quantifying the social benefits and costs of reducing phosphorus pollution under climate change.量化气候变化下减少磷污染的社会效益和成本。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Sep 1;293:112838. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112838. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
5
An Assessment of Earth's Climate Sensitivity Using Multiple Lines of Evidence.利用多条证据评估地球气候敏感性
Rev Geophys. 2020 Dec;58(4):e2019RG000678. doi: 10.1029/2019RG000678. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
6
Assessing the Social and Environmental Costs of Institution Nitrogen Footprints.评估机构氮足迹的社会和环境成本。
Sustainability (New Rochelle). 2017 Apr 1;10(2):114-122. doi: 10.1089/sus.2017.29099.jec.
7
An Integrated Tool for Calculating and Reducing Institution Carbon and Nitrogen Footprints.一种用于计算和减少机构碳足迹和氮足迹的综合工具。
Sustainability (New Rochelle). 2017 Apr 1;10(2):140-148. doi: 10.1089/sus.2017.29092.aml.
8
The Nitrogen Footprint Tool Network: A Multi-Institution Program To Reduce Nitrogen Pollution.氮足迹工具网络:一项减少氮污染的多机构计划。
Sustainability (New Rochelle). 2017 Apr 1;10(2):79-88. doi: 10.1089/sus.2017.29098.eac.
9
Using multiple lines of evidence to assess the risk of ecosystem collapse.运用多条证据线评估生态系统崩溃的风险。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Sep 27;284(1863). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0660.
10
Revisiting the social cost of carbon.重新审视碳的社会成本。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Feb 14;114(7):1518-1523. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1609244114. Epub 2017 Jan 31.