Bernstein Ari, Zhu Michael, Loloi Justin, Babar Mustufa, Winokur Nick, Wysocki Matthew, Cohen Seth
Department of Urology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, United States.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States.
Sex Med. 2023 Mar 1;11(2):qfac020. doi: 10.1093/sexmed/qfac020. eCollection 2023 Apr.
Patients are increasingly looking to social media platforms for medical information.
In this study we aimed to evaluate the quality of information regarding premature ejaculation (PE) on TikTok.
The term "premature ejaculation" was searched on TikTok on a single day in May 2022. Videos were sorted by 3 reviewers as reliable or unreliable based on the accuracy of video content. Relevant user metrics were collected for each video, including the numbers of likes, shares, and followers, and the video length, source of upload, and speaker type. The quality of information was objectified with 2 validated tools, with mean scores obtained from the 3 reviewers, the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) and the 5-point modified DISCERN instrument.
Outcomes were video reliability categorization, video and user metrics as described above, and video quality as quantified by PEMAT and DISCERN scores.
Eight videos were categorized as reliable and 32 videos were categorized as unreliable. The mean number of "likes" per video was higher in the reliable than in the unreliable group (1238 vs 126, < .018). Accounts posting reliable videos had higher mean numbers of followers than those posting unreliable videos (55 050 vs 12 042, = .025). The majority of unreliable videos (75%) vs reliable videos (12.5%) were posted by self-identified patients or individual users, whereas 62.5% of reliable videos vs versus 6.3% of unreliable videos were posted by individual physicians or physician groups. Few videos overall mentioned PE definition, indications for PE treatment, types of treatment, or value of psychological intervention (12.5%, 15%, 22.5%, and 5.0% of videos, respectively). Video length and number of shares did not differ between groups. Reliable videos had higher PEMAT (73.0 vs 45.1, < .001) and DISCERN (2.7 vs 0, < .001.) scores.
There exists a critical need for enhanced quality of medical information on social media platforms in hopes of encouraging patients with impaired sexual function to seek appropriate medical care.
Strengths of this study include the objective use of validated quality assessment tools and a focus on TikTok as an emerging social media platform. Limitations include large numbers of excluded videos.
The quality of available information regarding PE on TikTok is low, with a significant percentage of videos on this topic fraught with inaccuracies. Given TikTok's prominence as a social media platform primarily geared toward younger audiences, we emphasize the need for improvement in the quality of information available regarding PE and its management.
患者越来越多地在社交媒体平台上寻求医疗信息。
在本研究中,我们旨在评估TikTok上有关早泄(PE)信息的质量。
2022年5月的一天,在TikTok上搜索了“早泄”一词。3名评审员根据视频内容的准确性将视频分类为可靠或不可靠。收集每个视频的相关用户指标,包括点赞数、分享数和关注者数量,以及视频长度、上传来源和发言者类型。使用2种经过验证的工具对信息质量进行客观评估,由3名评审员获得平均分数,即患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT)和5分制改良的辨别工具。
8个视频被分类为可靠,32个视频被分类为不可靠。可靠组中每个视频的平均“点赞”数高于不可靠组(1238对126,<0.018)。发布可靠视频的账户的平均关注者数量高于发布不可靠视频的账户(55050对12042,P = 0.025)。大多数不可靠视频(75%)与可靠视频(12.5%)由自称患者或个人用户发布,而62.5%的可靠视频与6.3%的不可靠视频由个体医生或医生团体发布。总体而言,很少有视频提及PE的定义、PE治疗的适应症、治疗类型或心理干预的价值(分别占视频的12.5%、15%、22.5%和5.0%)。两组之间的视频长度和分享数没有差异。可靠视频的PEMAT(73.0对45.1,<0.001)和辨别(2.7对0,<0.001)得分更高。
迫切需要提高社交媒体平台上医疗信息的质量,以鼓励性功能障碍患者寻求适当的医疗护理。
本研究的优势包括客观使用经过验证的质量评估工具,并将重点放在TikTok这个新兴的社交媒体平台上。局限性包括大量视频被排除。
TikTok上关于PE的现有信息质量较低,该主题的视频中有很大比例存在不准确之处。鉴于TikTok作为一个主要面向年轻受众的社交媒体平台的突出地位,我们强调需要提高有关PE及其管理的可用信息的质量。