• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

检查 TikTok 和 YouTube 上关于尿路感染的信息和错误信息。

Examination of Information and Misinformation about Urinary Tract Infections on TikTok and YouTube.

机构信息

Section of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Seattle, WA.

Mercer Island, WA.

出版信息

Urology. 2022 Oct;168:35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.06.030. Epub 2022 Jul 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2022.06.030
PMID:35809700
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe and assess the quality and accuracy of the most highly viewed YouTube and TikTok posts related to urinary tract infections (UTIs). Social media is increasingly a resource for health information. YouTube and TikTok videos are highly utilized and are potentially a source of helpful information or misinformation.

METHODS

During January 2021, "UTI" was searched within YouTube and TikTok and the most relevant videos were identified and analyzed for their content. Accuracy of scientific information, possible misinformation, and credibility of the videos was rated independently by three reviewers. Posts were categorized as educational/informational, shared experience, humor/entertainment, and home remedies/alternative therapies.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

In 50 YouTube and 50 TikTok videos respectively, the median number of views was 49K and 1.4M, the median number of likes was 296 and 58K, and the median number of comments was 50 and 616. The proportion of female to male presenters was equal for YouTube videos while 94% of those from TikTok were female. Overall, YouTube videos had higher median scores for scientific information, credibility, and less misinformation compared to TikTok. YouTube videos with more views, likes, and comments tended to have lower scores in all categories and more misinformation. More presenters were medical professionals on YouTube videos than those on TikTok. While videos from both platforms contained misinformation, none promoted misinformation that would cause harm to health. Healthcare providers should be aware of the potential influence of social media as patients are getting health information from many sources.

摘要

目的

描述和评估与尿路感染 (UTI) 相关的最受关注的 YouTube 和 TikTok 帖子的质量和准确性。社交媒体越来越成为获取健康信息的资源。YouTube 和 TikTok 视频的使用率很高,并且可能是有用信息或错误信息的来源。

方法

在 2021 年 1 月期间,在 YouTube 和 TikTok 中搜索“UTI”,并确定并分析最相关的视频的内容。由三位审阅者独立评估科学信息的准确性、可能存在的错误信息以及视频的可信度。帖子分为教育/信息类、分享经验类、幽默/娱乐类和家庭疗法/替代疗法类。

结果与结论

分别在 50 个 YouTube 和 50 个 TikTok 视频中,观看次数中位数分别为 49K 和 1.4M,点赞数中位数分别为 296 和 58K,评论数中位数分别为 50 和 616。在 YouTube 视频中,男女主播的比例相等,而 TikTok 视频中 94%为女性。总体而言,与 TikTok 相比,YouTube 视频的科学信息、可信度得分更高,错误信息更少。观看次数、点赞数和评论数较高的 YouTube 视频在所有类别中的得分都较低,且错误信息更多。在 YouTube 视频中有更多的主播是医疗专业人员,而 TikTok 上的主播则较少。虽然两个平台的视频都包含错误信息,但都没有宣传会对健康造成伤害的错误信息。医疗保健提供者应该意识到社交媒体的潜在影响,因为患者正在从多个来源获取健康信息。

相似文献

1
Examination of Information and Misinformation about Urinary Tract Infections on TikTok and YouTube.检查 TikTok 和 YouTube 上关于尿路感染的信息和错误信息。
Urology. 2022 Oct;168:35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.06.030. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
2
Female urinary incontinence on TikTok and YouTube: is online video content sufficient?TikTok 和 YouTube 上的女性尿失禁:在线视频内容是否足够?
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Nov;34(11):2775-2781. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05607-0. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
3
How much information regarding gingival enlargement can we get from TikTok and YouTube?我们能从 TikTok 和 YouTube 上获取多少关于牙龈增生的信息?
Spec Care Dentist. 2024 Jul-Aug;44(4):1115-1125. doi: 10.1111/scd.12957. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
4
YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok videos as sources of medical information on laryngeal carcinoma: cross-sectional content analysis study.YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok 视频作为喉癌医学信息来源:横断面内容分析研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):1594. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19077-6.
5
Is the information about orthodontics on Youtube and TikTok reliable for the oral health of the public? A cross sectional comparative study.Youtube 和 TikTok 上有关牙齿矫正的信息对公众的口腔健康可靠吗?一项横断面比较研究。
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Oct;123(5):e349-e354. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2022.04.009. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
6
Third-Line Overactive Bladder Therapies on TikTok: What Does the Public Learn?TikTok上的三线膀胱过度活动症治疗方法:公众了解到了什么?
Urogynecology (Phila). 2024 Jun 1;30(6):557-563. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001431. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
7
Cross-sectional and comparative analysis of videos on erectile dysfunction treatment on YouTube and TikTok.YouTube 和 TikTok 上治疗勃起功能障碍视频的横断面和对比分析。
Andrologia. 2022 Jun;54(5):e14392. doi: 10.1111/and.14392. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
8
An analysis of oral contraceptive related videos on TikTok.TikTok上与口服避孕药相关视频的分析。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2024 Jun 12;4(3):100364. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100364. eCollection 2024 Aug.
9
The devil is in the details: Understanding how misinformation regarding epilepsy manifests in TikTok videos.魔鬼在细节中:了解有关癫痫的错误信息如何在 TikTok 视频中表现出来。
Epileptic Disord. 2023 Feb;25(1):28-32. doi: 10.1002/epd2.20036. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
10
Analyzing the Quality of Aesthetic Surgery Procedure Videos on TikTok.分析 TikTok 上美容手术流程视频的质量。
Aesthet Surg J. 2021 Nov 12;41(12):2078-2083. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab291.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality and reliability of prostate cancer-Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-sectional content analysis study.TikTok和哔哩哔哩上前列腺癌相关视频的质量与可靠性:横断面内容分析研究
Digit Health. 2025 Sep 3;11:20552076251376263. doi: 10.1177/20552076251376263. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Evaluating the Educational Quality and Accuracy of Carpal Tunnel-and Cubital Tunnel-Related Videos on TikTok.评估TikTok上与腕管和肘管相关视频的教育质量和准确性。
Hand (N Y). 2025 Sep 7:15589447251366458. doi: 10.1177/15589447251366458.
3
An assessment of the quality and readability level of online content on urinary tract infection treatment in Spanish and English.
对西班牙语和英语中关于尿路感染治疗的在线内容的质量和可读性水平的评估。
Transl Androl Urol. 2025 Jul 30;14(7):1959-1977. doi: 10.21037/tau-2025-221. Epub 2025 Jul 28.
4
Social Media in Urologic Healthcare: Transforming Treatment, Management, and Online Medical Communication.泌尿外科医疗中的社交媒体:变革治疗、管理及在线医疗沟通
Int Neurourol J. 2025 Jun;29(2):71-80. doi: 10.5213/inj.2550064.032. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
5
Cross-platform analysis of atrial fibrillation scientific videos: using composite index and a basic assessment scale.心房颤动科学视频的跨平台分析:使用综合指数和基本评估量表。
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 25;13:1507776. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1507776. eCollection 2025.
6
TikTok as a Resource for Fertility Information and Support: A Patient Survey.抖音作为生育信息与支持的资源:一项患者调查
J Family Reprod Health. 2024 Dec;18(4):240-245. doi: 10.18502/jfrh.v18i4.17424.
7
Perceived Barriers to Care for Urinary Tract Infections in Emerging Adulthood.青年期泌尿道感染护理中的感知障碍
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 May 8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09565-9.
8
#GenderAffirmingHormoneTherapy and Health Information on TikTok: Thematic Content Analysis.#TikTok上的性别肯定激素治疗与健康信息:主题内容分析
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Apr 29;5:e66845. doi: 10.2196/66845.
9
Sync or Swim: Navigating the Tides of Menstrual Cycle Messaging on TikTok.同步或沉没:在TikTok上应对月经周期信息的浪潮
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Jun;57(2):127-132. doi: 10.1111/psrh.70004. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
10
An examination of the quality of kidney stone information on YouTube and TikTok.对YouTube和TikTok上肾结石信息质量的一项调查。
Urolithiasis. 2025 Feb 25;53(1):40. doi: 10.1007/s00240-025-01713-4.