Suppr超能文献

评估现有操场对残疾儿童包容性的工具的范围审查。

A scoping Review of Tools to Evaluate Existing Playgrounds for Inclusivity of Children with Disabilities.

作者信息

Taylor Leah G, Primucci Mara, Vanderloo Leigh M, Arbour-Nicitopoulos Kelly P, Leo Jennifer, Gilliland Jason, Tucker Patricia

机构信息

Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Child Health and Physical Activity Laboratory, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 Feb 23;4:1102490. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1102490. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Children with disabilities may be unable engage playground spaces due to barriers exacerbating exclusion. Therefore, clarity on how to evaluate existing playgrounds for inclusivity of children with disabilities is required.

METHODS

A scoping review was undertaken to explore auditing tools.

RESULTS

Fourteen white and grey literature resources were identified. The term "inclusion" was operationalized differently across tools, primarily focusing on physical accessibility. Characteristics of the tools were synthesized into 13 inclusive design recommendations for playgrounds. Two tools showed promise, evaluating 12/13 recommendations.

DISCUSSION

The results of this review provide guidance on existing tools for evaluating playgrounds for inclusion for community stakeholders and researchers.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://osf.io/rycmj.

摘要

引言

由于障碍加剧了排斥,残疾儿童可能无法参与游乐场活动。因此,需要明确如何评估现有游乐场对残疾儿童的包容性。

方法

进行了一项范围综述以探索审计工具。

结果

确定了14篇白色和灰色文献资源。“包容性”一词在不同工具中的操作方式不同,主要侧重于物理可达性。这些工具的特点被综合成13条游乐场包容性设计建议。有两种工具显示出前景,评估了13条建议中的12条。

讨论

本综述结果为社区利益相关者和研究人员评估游乐场包容性的现有工具提供了指导。

系统综述注册

https://osf.io/rycmj。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/321a/9995607/9e30796adc3f/fresc-04-1102490-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验