• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估现有操场对残疾儿童包容性的工具的范围审查。

A scoping Review of Tools to Evaluate Existing Playgrounds for Inclusivity of Children with Disabilities.

作者信息

Taylor Leah G, Primucci Mara, Vanderloo Leigh M, Arbour-Nicitopoulos Kelly P, Leo Jennifer, Gilliland Jason, Tucker Patricia

机构信息

Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Child Health and Physical Activity Laboratory, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 Feb 23;4:1102490. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1102490. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fresc.2023.1102490
PMID:36910877
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9995607/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Children with disabilities may be unable engage playground spaces due to barriers exacerbating exclusion. Therefore, clarity on how to evaluate existing playgrounds for inclusivity of children with disabilities is required.

METHODS

A scoping review was undertaken to explore auditing tools.

RESULTS

Fourteen white and grey literature resources were identified. The term "inclusion" was operationalized differently across tools, primarily focusing on physical accessibility. Characteristics of the tools were synthesized into 13 inclusive design recommendations for playgrounds. Two tools showed promise, evaluating 12/13 recommendations.

DISCUSSION

The results of this review provide guidance on existing tools for evaluating playgrounds for inclusion for community stakeholders and researchers.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://osf.io/rycmj.

摘要

引言

由于障碍加剧了排斥,残疾儿童可能无法参与游乐场活动。因此,需要明确如何评估现有游乐场对残疾儿童的包容性。

方法

进行了一项范围综述以探索审计工具。

结果

确定了14篇白色和灰色文献资源。“包容性”一词在不同工具中的操作方式不同,主要侧重于物理可达性。这些工具的特点被综合成13条游乐场包容性设计建议。有两种工具显示出前景,评估了13条建议中的12条。

讨论

本综述结果为社区利益相关者和研究人员评估游乐场包容性的现有工具提供了指导。

系统综述注册

https://osf.io/rycmj。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/321a/9995607/9e30796adc3f/fresc-04-1102490-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/321a/9995607/9e30796adc3f/fresc-04-1102490-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/321a/9995607/9e30796adc3f/fresc-04-1102490-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A scoping Review of Tools to Evaluate Existing Playgrounds for Inclusivity of Children with Disabilities.评估现有操场对残疾儿童包容性的工具的范围审查。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 Feb 23;4:1102490. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1102490. eCollection 2023.
2
Playground Inclusivity for Children With a Disability: Protocol for a Scoping Review.残疾儿童游乐场包容性:范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jul 22;11(7):e37312. doi: 10.2196/37312.
3
A Scoping Review of Evidence-Informed Recommendations for Designing Inclusive Playgrounds.一项关于设计包容性游乐场的循证建议的范围综述。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2021 May 24;2:664595. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2021.664595. eCollection 2021.
4
A scoping review of the playground experiences of children with AAC needs.对有交流辅助需求的儿童的操场体验进行的范围综述。
Augment Altern Commun. 2022 Dec;38(4):245-255. doi: 10.1080/07434618.2022.2155874. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
5
Promoting Health through Accessible Public Playgrounds.通过可及的公共游乐场促进健康。
Children (Basel). 2023 Jul 29;10(8):1308. doi: 10.3390/children10081308.
6
Accessibility and usability of playground environments for children under 12: A scoping review.12岁以下儿童游乐场环境的可达性与可用性:一项范围综述。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2015;22(5):331-44. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2015.1049549. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
7
Can universal design support outdoor play, social participation, and inclusion in public playgrounds? A scoping review.通用设计能否支持户外游戏、社会参与和公共游乐场的包容性? 范围综述。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jun;44(13):3304-3325. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1858353. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
8
Designing for inclusion in public playgrounds: a scoping review of definitions, and utilization of universal design.为公共游乐场设计包容性环境:对通用设计的定义和应用进行的范围综述。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Nov;18(8):1453-1465. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2021.2022788. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
9
The role of playgrounds in promoting children's health - a scoping review.游乐场在促进儿童健康方面的作用——范围综述。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Jul 8;21(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01618-2.
10
Children's perceptions of playing on inclusive playgrounds: A qualitative study.儿童对包容性游乐场地的感知:一项定性研究。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2021 Feb;28(2):136-146. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2020.1810768. Epub 2020 Aug 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Environmental Qualities That Enhance Outdoor Play in Community Playgrounds from the Perspective of Children with and without Disabilities: A Scoping Review.从残疾和非残疾儿童的角度出发,探讨提升社区游乐场户外游戏环境质量的研究述评。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 18;20(3):1763. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031763.
2
A Scoping Review of Evidence-Informed Recommendations for Designing Inclusive Playgrounds.一项关于设计包容性游乐场的循证建议的范围综述。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2021 May 24;2:664595. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2021.664595. eCollection 2021.
3
Playground Inclusivity for Children With a Disability: Protocol for a Scoping Review.
残疾儿童游乐场包容性:范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jul 22;11(7):e37312. doi: 10.2196/37312.
4
Designing for inclusion in public playgrounds: a scoping review of definitions, and utilization of universal design.为公共游乐场设计包容性环境:对通用设计的定义和应用进行的范围综述。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Nov;18(8):1453-1465. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2021.2022788. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
5
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.《PRISMA 2020声明:报告系统评价的更新指南》
Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;10(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4.
6
Systematic review of the correlates of outdoor play and time among children aged 3-12 years.系统评价 3-12 岁儿童户外活动和时间的相关因素。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Mar 18;18(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01097-9.
7
Can universal design support outdoor play, social participation, and inclusion in public playgrounds? A scoping review.通用设计能否支持户外游戏、社会参与和公共游乐场的包容性? 范围综述。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jun;44(13):3304-3325. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1858353. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
8
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.系统评价或范围综述?在选择系统评价或范围综述方法时,作者的指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
9
Healthy play, better coping: The importance of play for the development of children in health and disease.健康游戏,更好应对:游戏对健康和疾病儿童发展的重要性。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Dec;95:421-429. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.09.024. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
10
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.