Efficacy of Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.

BACKGROUND

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is currently used as a guide for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), however its clinical benefit in comparison with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) remains unclear in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of OCT-guided PCI in comparison with IVUS-guided PCI in patients with ACS.

METHODS

The study participants comprised 280 consecutive ACS patients who underwent primary PCI for de novo culprit lesions under OCT or IVUS guidance.

RESULTS

Compared with the IVUS-guided group, the OCT-guided group had lower Killip classification (p < 0.001) and lower creatinine level at baseline (0.80 ± 0.37 mg/dl vs. 1.13 ± 1.29 mg/dl, p = 0.004). Fluoroscopy time and total procedure time were significantly shorter in the OCT-guided group than in the IVUS-guided group (32 ± 13 min vs. 41 ± 19 min, p < 0.001, and 98 ± 39 min vs. 127 ± 47 min, p = 0.002, respectively). The major adverse cardiovascular event-free survival curves were similar between the OCT- and IVUS-guided groups after adjusting for clinical background using propensity score (log-rank p = 0.328).

CONCLUSIONS

After adjusting for clinical background, OCT-guided PCI could provide comparable clinical outcomes to IVUS-guided PCI in patients with ACS. Shorter fluoroscopy time and total procedure time with OCT may reduce patient radiation exposure and also improve hospital workflow.