Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Oct;6(10):1095-1104. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.04.014. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of frequency domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) for coronary measurements compared with quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).
Accurate luminal measurement is expected in FD-OCT because this technology offers high resolution and excellent contrast between lumen and vessel wall.
In 5 medical centers, 100 patients with coronary artery disease were prospectively studied by using angiography, FD-OCT, and IVUS. In addition, 5 phantom models of known lumen dimensions (lumen diameter 3.08 mm; lumen area 7.45 mm(2)) were examined using FD-OCT and IVUS. Quantitative image analyses of the coronary arteries and phantom models were performed by an independent core laboratory.
In the clinical study, the mean minimum lumen diameter measured by QCA was significantly smaller than that measured by FD-OCT (1.81 ± 0.72 mm vs. 1.91 ± 0.69 mm; p < 0.001) and the minimum lumen diameter measured by IVUS was significantly greater than that measured by FD-OCT (2.09 ± 0.60 mm vs. 1.91 ± 0.69 mm; p < 0.001). The minimum lumen area measured by IVUS was significantly greater than that by FD-OCT (3.68 ± 2.06 mm(2) vs. 3.27 ± 2.22 mm(2); p < 0.001), although a significant correlation was observed between the 2 imaging techniques (r = 0.95, p < 0.001; mean difference 0.41 mm(2)). Both FD-OCT and IVUS exhibited good interobserver reproducibility, but the root-mean-squared deviation between measurements was approximately twice as high for the IVUS measurements compared with the FD-OCT measurements (0.32 mm(2) vs. 0.16 mm(2)). In a phantom model, the mean lumen area according to FD-OCT was equal to the actual lumen area of the phantom model, with low SD; IVUS overestimated the lumen area and was less reproducible than FD-OCT (8.03 ± 0.58 mm(2) vs. 7.45 ± 0.17 mm(2); p < 0.001).
The results of this prospective multicenter study demonstrate that FD-OCT provides accurate and reproducible quantitative measurements of coronary dimensions in the clinical setting.
本研究旨在探讨频域光相干断层扫描(FD-OCT)与定量冠状动脉造影(QCA)和血管内超声(IVUS)相比,在冠状动脉测量方面的可靠性。
由于该技术提供了高分辨率和管腔与血管壁之间的出色对比度,因此预计 FD-OCT 能够进行准确的管腔测量。
在 5 家医疗中心中,前瞻性地对 100 例冠心病患者进行了血管造影、FD-OCT 和 IVUS 检查。此外,使用 FD-OCT 和 IVUS 检查了 5 个已知管腔尺寸(管腔直径 3.08mm;管腔面积 7.45mm²)的 phantom 模型。由独立的核心实验室对冠状动脉和 phantom 模型进行定量图像分析。
在临床研究中,QCA 测量的最小管腔直径明显小于 FD-OCT 测量的最小管腔直径(1.81 ± 0.72mm 与 1.91 ± 0.69mm;p < 0.001),IVUS 测量的最小管腔直径明显大于 FD-OCT 测量的最小管腔直径(2.09 ± 0.60mm 与 1.91 ± 0.69mm;p < 0.001)。IVUS 测量的最小管腔面积明显大于 FD-OCT 测量的最小管腔面积(3.68 ± 2.06mm² 与 3.27 ± 2.22mm²;p < 0.001),尽管两种成像技术之间存在显著相关性(r = 0.95,p < 0.001;平均差异 0.41mm²)。FD-OCT 和 IVUS 均表现出良好的观察者间可重复性,但 IVUS 测量的均方根偏差大约是 FD-OCT 测量的两倍(0.32mm² 与 0.16mm²)。在 phantom 模型中,根据 FD-OCT 测量的平均管腔面积与 phantom 模型的实际管腔面积相等,标准差较低;IVUS 高估了管腔面积,且可重复性不如 FD-OCT(8.03 ± 0.58mm² 与 7.45 ± 0.17mm²;p < 0.001)。
这项前瞻性多中心研究的结果表明,FD-OCT 可在临床环境中提供冠状动脉尺寸的准确且可重复的定量测量。