Charalampopoulos Anestis, Papakonstantinou Dimitrios, Bagias George, Nastos Konstantinos, Perdikaris Markos, Papagrigoriadis Savvas
Third Department of Surgery, "Attikon" University General Hospital/National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, GRC.
Rectal and Pelvic Surgery, Metropolitan General Hospital Athens, Athens, GRC.
Cureus. 2023 Mar 8;15(3):e35888. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35888. eCollection 2023 Mar.
Anal fistulas are common anorectal conditions, and surgery is the primary treatment option. In the last 20 years of literature, there exist a large number of surgical procedures, especially for the treatment of complex anal fistulas, as they present more recurrences and continence problems than simple anal fistulas. To date, there are no guidelines for choosing the best technique. We conducted a recent literature review, mainly the last 20 years, based on the PubMed and Google Scholar medical databases, with the goal of identifying the surgical procedures with the highest success rates, lowest recurrence rates, and best safety profiles. Clinical trials, retrospective studies, review articles, comparative studies, recent systematic reviews, and meta-analyses for various surgical techniques, as well as the latest guidelines of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, and the German S3 guidelines on simple and complex fistulas were reviewed. According to the literature, there is no recommendation for the optimal surgical technique. The etiology, complexity, and many other factors affect the outcome. In simple intersphincteric anal fistulas, fistulotomy is the procedure of choice. In simple low transsphincteric fistulas, the patient's selection is crucial in order to perform a safe fistulotomy or another sphincter-saving technique. The healing rate in simple anal fistulas is higher than 95% with low recurrence and without significant postoperative complications. In complex anal fistulas, only sphincter-saving techniques should be used; the optimal outcomes are obtained by the ligation of the intersphincteric fistulous tract (LIFT) and rectal advancement flaps. Those techniques assure high healing rates of 60-90%. The novel technique of the transanal opening of the intersphincteric space (TROPIS) is under evaluation. The novel sphincter-saving techniques of fistula laser closure (FiLac) and video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) are safe, with reported healing rates ranging from 65% to 90%. Surgeons should be familiar with all sphincter-saving techniques in order to face the variability of the fistulas-in-ano. Currently, there is no universally superior technique that can treat all fistulas.
肛瘘是常见的肛肠疾病,手术是主要的治疗选择。在过去20年的文献中,存在大量的手术方法,尤其是用于治疗复杂性肛瘘的方法,因为与单纯性肛瘘相比,复杂性肛瘘更容易复发且存在控便问题。迄今为止,尚无选择最佳技术的指南。我们基于PubMed和谷歌学术医学数据库进行了一项近期文献综述,主要针对过去20年的文献,目的是确定成功率最高、复发率最低且安全性最佳的手术方法。对各种手术技术的临床试验、回顾性研究、综述文章、比较研究、近期的系统评价和荟萃分析,以及美国结直肠外科医师协会、英国和爱尔兰结直肠外科学会的最新指南,和德国关于单纯性和复杂性肛瘘的S3指南进行了综述。根据文献,对于最佳手术技术尚无推荐。病因、复杂性以及许多其他因素都会影响治疗结果。在单纯性括约肌间肛瘘中,瘘管切开术是首选术式。在单纯性低位经括约肌肛瘘中,为了安全地进行瘘管切开术或其他保留括约肌的技术,患者的选择至关重要。单纯性肛瘘的愈合率高于95%,复发率低且术后无明显并发症。在复杂性肛瘘中,应仅使用保留括约肌的技术;通过括约肌间瘘管结扎术(LIFT)和直肠推进皮瓣术可获得最佳疗效。这些技术可确保60% - 90%的高愈合率。经肛门括约肌间间隙开放术(TROPIS)这一新技术正在评估中。肛瘘激光闭合术(FiLac)和视频辅助肛瘘治疗术(VAAFT)等新型保留括约肌技术是安全的,报道的愈合率在65%至90%之间。外科医生应熟悉所有保留括约肌的技术,以应对肛门肛瘘的多样性。目前,尚无一种普遍优越的技术能够治疗所有肛瘘。