Suppr超能文献

40岁以上成年人肩袖修复术后恢复参与娱乐性运动:结果与恢复运动分析

Return to recreational sports participation following rotator cuff repair in adults over 40 Years of age: outcomes and return to play analysis.

作者信息

Sonnier John Hayden, Connors Gregory, Campbell Michael P, Sabitsky Matthew, Paul Ryan W, Sando Hayden E, Emper William D, Cohen Steven B, Ciccotti Michael G, Tjoumakaris Fotios P, Freedman Kevin B

机构信息

Division of Sports Medicine, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

JSES Int. 2022 Dec 20;7(2):301-306. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.12.006. eCollection 2023 Mar.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the high prevalence of rotator cuff (RTC) tears in older adults, there is limited literature evaluating the return to recreational sport after repair. The purpose of this study was (1) to assess the patient-reported outcomes and return to sport rates following rotator cuff repair in patients aged more than 40 years with minimum 2-year follow-up; (2) to compare baseline, preoperative and postoperative outcomes, and level of play following repair of self-reported athletes with nonathletes; and (3) to compare return to sport rates in overhead athletes compared to nonoverhead athletes.

METHODS

Patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between January 2016 and January 2019 were screened for inclusion. Inclusion criteria included (1) age more than 40 years at the time of surgery, (2) arthroscopic repair of a full thickness RTC tear, and (3) preoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES) available. Eligible patients were contacted and invited to fill out a custom return to sport and patient-reported outcome survey.

RESULTS

Overall, 375 of the 1141 eligible patients completed the survey instrument. There were 210 self-reported athletes (mean age 59.2 ± 9.55 years) and 165 nonathletes (mean age 62.0 ± 8.27 years) ( = .003). Of the athletes, 193 (91.9%) returned to sport. The average age of athletes was 59.4 ± 9.33 years for those who returned to sport and 57.9 ± 12.0 years for those who did not ( = .631). Athletes reported higher ASES scores than nonathletes both preoperatively (49.8 ± 20.3 vs. 44.8 ± 18.9,  = .015) and postoperatively (87.6 ± 16.7 vs. 84.9 ± 17.5,  = .036), but there was no difference in mean ASES improvement between groups (37.7 ± 23.0 vs. 40.3 ± 24.5,  = .307). There was no difference in postoperative Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores when comparing self-reported athletes to nonathletes (85.4 ± 17.5 vs. 85.0 ± 18.7,  = .836). After controlling for age, sex, body mass index, and smoking status using a multivariate analysis, there was no difference in mean ASES improvement when comparing athletes to nonathletes.

CONCLUSION

There is a high rate of return to sport activities (> 90%) in older adult recreational athletes following arthroscopic repair of full thickness RTC tears and rates of return to sport did not significantly differ for overhead and nonoverhead athletes. Self-reported athletes were noted to have higher baseline, preoperative, and postoperative ASES scores than nonathletes, but the mean ASES improvement following repair did not significantly differ between groups.

摘要

背景

尽管肩袖(RTC)撕裂在老年人中普遍存在,但评估修复后恢复进行娱乐性运动的文献有限。本研究的目的是:(1)评估年龄超过40岁且至少随访2年的患者在肩袖修复术后患者报告的结局以及恢复运动的比例;(2)比较自我报告的运动员与非运动员在修复前、术后的基线、结局以及运动水平;(3)比较过头运动运动员与非过头运动运动员恢复运动的比例。

方法

对2016年1月至2019年1月期间接受关节镜下肩袖修复术的患者进行纳入筛查。纳入标准包括:(1)手术时年龄超过40岁;(2)关节镜下修复全层RTC撕裂;(3)有术前美国肩肘外科医师评分(ASES)。联系符合条件的患者并邀请他们填写一份定制的恢复运动和患者报告结局调查问卷。

结果

总体而言,1141名符合条件的患者中有375名完成了调查问卷。其中有210名自我报告的运动员(平均年龄59.2±9.55岁)和165名非运动员(平均年龄62.0±8.27岁)(P = 0.003)。在运动员中,193名(91.9%)恢复了运动。恢复运动的运动员平均年龄为59.4±9.33岁,未恢复运动的运动员平均年龄为57.9±12.0岁(P = 0.631)。运动员术前(49.8±20.3 vs. 44.8±18.9,P = 0.015)和术后(87.6±16.7 vs. 84.9±17.5,P = 0.036)的ASES评分均高于非运动员,但两组之间ASES评分的平均改善无差异(37.7±23.0 vs. 40.3±24.5,P = 0.307)。比较自我报告的运动员与非运动员时,术后单项评估数字评分无差异(85.4±17.5 vs. 85.0±18.7,P = 0.836)。在使用多变量分析控制年龄、性别、体重指数和吸烟状况后,比较运动员与非运动员时ASES评分的平均改善无差异。

结论

在全层RTC撕裂的关节镜修复术后,老年娱乐性运动员恢复运动活动的比例较高(>90%),过头运动运动员与非过头运动运动员恢复运动的比例无显著差异。自我报告的运动员术前、术后的基线ASES评分高于非运动员,但修复后两组之间ASES评分的平均改善无显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4640/9998732/69b5fe38f0fc/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验