The Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Comenius University Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.
The Centre for Psychiatric Disorders Research, Science Park, Comenius University Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Psychol Psychother. 2023 Sep;96(3):627-643. doi: 10.1111/papt.12460. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
There has been growing interest in the role of attachment mechanisms in the onset and maintenance of paranoia. The latest systematic reviews of mixed samples of healthy individuals and psychiatric patients have revealed that increased trait attachment anxiety and avoidance are associated with experiencing paranoia, with trait attachment anxiety showing a stronger association. Few studies have examined attachment and paranoia in naturalistic conditions via the Experience Sampling Method.
The present study examined whether experiences of attachment anxiety and avoidance fluctuate in the flow of daily life, and whether a within-person change in both attachment states precedes the experience of momentary paranoia, and negative and positive emotions.
Thirty-seven clinical participants and twenty-six healthy controls were studied over six consecutive days using the Experience Sampling Method (ESM). An experience-in-close-relationships questionnaire (ECR-R 16 SF) was used to capture trait attachment dimensions. Several ESM items were used to capture momentary negative and positive affect, paranoia and attachment insecurity states.
The findings revealed that fluctuations in both attachment insecurity states were significantly higher in the clinical group. A prior elevated attachment anxiety and avoidance was followed by an increase in negative affect in the next moment and elevated attachment avoidance was additionally followed by a decrease in positive affect and an increase in paranoia.
Our findings reveal the specific temporal associations between momentary attachment insecurity states as predictors of change in emotions/affects and paranoia, along with evidence that state attachment avoidance has a superior impact on momentary affect and paranoia compared to state attachment anxiety. These results contrast with those of recent cross-sectional studies.
人们对依恋机制在偏执观念的发生和维持中的作用越来越感兴趣。最近对健康个体和精神病人混合样本的系统综述表明,特质依恋焦虑和回避与偏执观念有关,特质依恋焦虑的相关性更强。很少有研究通过经验采样法在自然条件下研究依恋和偏执。
本研究通过经验采样法(ESM)考察了依恋焦虑和回避在日常生活中的波动情况,以及个体依恋状态的变化是否先于瞬间偏执、负性和正性情绪的变化。
37 名临床参与者和 26 名健康对照者在连续 6 天内接受了 ESM 测试。使用依恋关系经验问卷(ECR-R 16 SF)来测量特质依恋维度。使用一些 ESM 项目来测量瞬间的负性和正性情绪、偏执和依恋不安全感状态。
研究结果显示,临床组的两种依恋不安全感状态的波动明显更高。先前的依恋焦虑和回避水平升高后,下一刻的负性情绪会增加,而依恋回避水平升高后,正性情绪会减少,偏执观念会增加。
我们的研究结果揭示了瞬间依恋不安全感状态作为情绪/情感和偏执变化的预测因素之间的具体时间关联,并且证据表明状态依恋回避对瞬间情绪和偏执的影响比状态依恋焦虑更显著。这些结果与最近的横断面研究结果相反。