NHS Borders Mental Health Service, Melrose, UK.
School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Br J Clin Psychol. 2020 Sep;59(3):290-318. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12247. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
Attachment has long been theorized to play a key role in the development of paranoia. Associations between both constructs have been reported over the last decade, but have ranged widely in magnitude to date. The present study is the first publication to synthesize existing literature and provide a meta-analytic estimate of the attachment-paranoia relationship.
A systematic search of studies available up to January 2019 was conducted using Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, OpenGrey, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. This yielded 26 studies which met inclusion criteria (N = 10,539; mean age range 16-47; 45% male). Data were analysed using random effects models with restricted maximum likelihood variance estimator. Age and sex were examined as moderators in meta-regressions.
Paranoia was significantly associated with attachment anxiety (r = .38; 95% CI: 0.32, 0.44; p < .0001; I = 88%; k = 26) and attachment avoidance (r = .24; 95% CI: 0.18, 0.29; p < .0001; I = 79%; k = 26). The strength of these associations did not differ between clinical and non-clinical participant samples. Neither age nor sex moderated identified relationships.
There is a moderate association between both constructs of interest. These findings suggest that attachment insecurity may be an active agent in the aetiology and/or maintenance of experiences on the paranoia continuum. Implications for psychological treatment, for example, consideration of attachment status in formulations, are briefly discussed.
Paranoia is associated with both attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance. These associations are of similar strength for people with and without psychosis. Attachment may contribute to the development and/or maintenance of paranoia. It may be beneficial to target attachment in psychological therapies for psychosis.
长期以来,依恋一直被认为在偏执的发展中起着关键作用。在过去的十年中,这两个结构之间的关联已经有报道,但迄今为止,其关联的幅度差异很大。本研究是第一篇综合现有文献并提供依恋-偏执关系的荟萃分析估计的出版物。
使用 Embase、MEDLINE、CINAHL、PsycINFO、OpenGrey 和 ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global 对截至 2019 年 1 月的研究进行了系统检索。这产生了 26 项符合纳入标准的研究(N=10539;平均年龄范围为 16-47;45%为男性)。使用具有限制最大似然方差估计的随机效应模型对数据进行分析。在元回归中,年龄和性别被视为调节剂。
偏执与依恋焦虑(r=0.38;95%置信区间:0.32,0.44;p<0.0001;I=88%;k=26)和依恋回避(r=0.24;95%置信区间:0.18,0.29;p<0.0001;I=79%;k=26)显著相关。这些关联的强度在临床和非临床参与者样本之间没有差异。年龄和性别均未调节所确定的关系。
这两个感兴趣的结构之间存在中等程度的关联。这些发现表明,依恋不安全感可能是偏执连续体上经验的病因和/或维持的一个活跃因素。简要讨论了对心理治疗的影响,例如,在配方中考虑依恋状态。
偏执与依恋焦虑和依恋回避都有关联。对于有和没有精神病的人来说,这些关联的强度是相似的。依恋可能有助于偏执的发展和/或维持。在精神病的心理治疗中针对依恋可能是有益的。