Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Universitätsmedizin - CharitéBerlin, Germany.
Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 Sep;44(9):1410-1416. doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.285. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
The aim of this study was to quantify the time delay between screening and initiation of contact isolation for carriers of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E).
This study was a secondary analysis of contact isolation periods in a cluster-randomized controlled trial that compared 2 strategies to control ESBL-E (trial no. ISRCTN57648070). Patients admitted to 20 non-ICU wards in Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, and Switzerland were screened for ESBL-E carriage on admission, weekly thereafter, and on discharge. Data collection included the day of sampling, the day the wards were notified of the result, and subsequent ESBL-E isolation days.
Between January 2014 and August 2016, 19,122 patients, with a length of stay ≥2 days were included. At least 1 culture was collected for 16,091 patients (84%), with a median duration between the admission day and the day of first sample collection of 2 days (interquartile range [IQR], 1-3). Moreover, 854 (41%) of all 2,078 ESBL-E carriers remained without isolation during their hospital stay. In total, 6,040 ESBL-E days (32% of all ESBL-E days) accrued for patients who were not isolated. Of 2,078 ESBL-E-carriers, 1,478 ESBL-E carriers (71%) had no previous history of ESBL-E carriage. Also, 697 (34%) were placed in contact isolation with a delay of 4 days (IQR, 2-5), accounting for 2,723 nonisolation days (15% of ESBL-E days).
Even with extensive surveillance screening, almost one-third of all ESBL-E days were nonisolation days. Limitations in routine culture-based ESBL-E detection impeded timely and exhaustive implementation of targeted contact isolation.
本研究旨在量化产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)肠杆菌科(ESBL-E)定植者从筛查到开始接触隔离的时间延迟。
本研究是一项针对控制 ESBL-E 的 2 种策略进行的接触隔离期的二次分析(试验编号 ISRCTN57648070)。德国、荷兰、西班牙和瑞士的 20 个非 ICU 病房的患者在入院时、此后每周和出院时进行 ESBL-E 定植筛查。数据收集包括采样日、病房被告知结果的日期以及随后的 ESBL-E 隔离日。
2014 年 1 月至 2016 年 8 月期间,共纳入 19122 名住院时间≥2 天的患者。至少采集了 1 份标本的患者有 16091 例(84%),入院日与首次标本采集日之间的中位时间为 2 天(四分位间距 [IQR],1-3)。此外,在住院期间,所有 2078 例 ESBL-E 定植者中,有 854 例(41%)未进行隔离。总共,有 6040 例 ESBL-E 天(所有 ESBL-E 天的 32%)发生在未进行隔离的患者身上。在 2078 例 ESBL-E 定植者中,有 1478 例(71%)无 ESBL-E 定植史。此外,有 697 例(34%)延迟 4 天(IQR,2-5)进行接触隔离,导致 2723 天(ESBL-E 天的 15%)未进行隔离。
即使进行了广泛的监测筛查,仍有近三分之一的 ESBL-E 天数未进行隔离。常规基于培养的 ESBL-E 检测的局限性阻碍了针对接触隔离的及时和彻底实施。