Yang Yi-Zhuo, Zhang Ming, Mu Sha, Guo Xin-Meng, Wang Hui, Tang Zhe, Peng Hong-Mei
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Medical Center of the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
College of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China.
Curr Med Sci. 2023 Apr;43(2):304-312. doi: 10.1007/s11596-022-2687-0. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
This study aimed to compare the clinical effects of double ovulation stimulation (DouStim) applied during the follicular and luteal phases with the antagonist protocol in patients with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) and asynchronous follicular development undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART).
The clinical data of patients with DOR and asynchronous follicular development receiving ART from January 2020 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups according to their ovulation stimulation protocol: DouStim group (n=30) and antagonist group (n=62). Assisted reproduction and clinical pregnancy outcomes were compared between the two groups.
In the DouStim group, the number of oocytes retrieved, metaphase II (MII) oocytes, two-pronuclei (2PN), day 3 (D3) embryos, D3 high-quality embryos as well as blastocyst formation, implantation, and human chorionic gonadotropin-positive rates were significantly greater than those in the antagonist group (all P<0.05). No significant differences were found in MII, fertilization, or continued pregnancy rates at the first frozen embryo transfer (FET), in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cancellation, or early medical abortion rates between the groups (all P>0.05). Except for the early medical abortion rate, the DouStim group generally had favorable outcomes. In the DouStim group, the dosage and duration of gonadotropin and the fertilization rate were significantly greater in the first ovulation stimulation induction than in the second ovulation stimulation induction (P<0.05).
The DouStim protocol efficiently and economically obtained more mature oocytes and high-quality embryos for patients with DOR and asynchronous follicular development.
本研究旨在比较在卵泡期和黄体期应用双排卵刺激(DouStim)与拮抗剂方案对卵巢储备功能减退(DOR)且卵泡发育不同步的接受辅助生殖技术(ART)患者的临床效果。
回顾性分析2020年1月至2021年12月接受ART的DOR且卵泡发育不同步患者的临床资料。根据排卵刺激方案将患者分为两组:DouStim组(n = 30)和拮抗剂组(n = 62)。比较两组的辅助生殖及临床妊娠结局。
DouStim组的取卵数、中期Ⅱ(MII)卵母细胞数、双原核(2PN)数、第3天(D3)胚胎数、D3优质胚胎数以及囊胚形成率、着床率和人绒毛膜促性腺激素阳性率均显著高于拮抗剂组(均P < 0.05)。两组在首次冻融胚胎移植(FET)时的MII、受精或持续妊娠率、体外受精(IVF)取消率或早期药物流产率方面均无显著差异(均P > 0.05)。除早期药物流产率外,DouStim组总体结局良好。在DouStim组中,首次排卵刺激诱导时促性腺激素的剂量和持续时间以及受精率均显著高于第二次排卵刺激诱导(P < 0.05)。
DouStim方案能高效且经济地为DOR且卵泡发育不同步的患者获取更多成熟卵母细胞和优质胚胎。