• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳房缩小术后手术入路与 BREAST-Q 评分改善是否相关?一项系统评价。

Are Surgical Approaches Correlated With BREAST-Q Score Improvements After Reduction Mammoplasty? A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook.

Long Island Plastic Surgical Group PC, Garden City, NY.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 2023 Jun 1;90(6S Suppl 5):S659-S666. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003445. Epub 2023 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000003445
PMID:36913563
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the commonly recognized benefits and drawbacks of each surgical technique for reduction mammoplasty, data on the influence of each surgical approach on patient quality of life and satisfaction remains limited. Our study aims to evaluate the association between surgical factors and BREAST-Q scores for reduction mammoplasty patients.

METHODS

A literature review through August 6, 2021, was conducted using the PubMed database to select publications that used the BREAST-Q questionnaire to evaluate outcomes after reduction mammoplasty. Studies examining breast reconstruction, breast augmentation, oncoplastic reduction, or breast cancer patients were excluded. The BREAST-Q data were stratified by incision pattern and pedicle type.

RESULTS

We identified 14 articles that met selection criteria. Among 1816 patients, the mean age ranged from 15.8 to 55 years, mean body mass index ranged from 22.5 to 32.4 kg/m 2 , and bilateral mean resected weight ranged from 323 to 1845.96 g. Overall complication rate was 19.9%. On average, satisfaction with breasts improved by 52.1 ± 0.9 points ( P < 0.0001), psychosocial well-being improved by 43.0 ± 1.0 points ( P < 0.0001), sexual well-being improved by 38.2 ± 1.2 points ( P < 0.0001), and physical well-being improved by 27.9 ± 0.8 points ( P < 0.0001). No significant correlations were observed when mean difference was modeled against complication rates or prevalence of superomedial pedicle use, inferior pedicle use, Wise pattern incision, or vertical pattern incision. Complication rates were not correlated with preoperative, postoperative, or mean change in BREAST-Q scores. A negative correlation was noted between the prevalence of superomedial pedicle use and postoperative physical well-being (Spearman rank correlation coefficient [SRCC], -0.66742; P < 0.05). The prevalence of Wise pattern incision was negatively correlated with postoperative sexual well-being (SRCC, -0.66233; P < 0.05) and physical well-being (SRCC, -0.69521; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although either preoperative or postoperative BREAST-Q scores may be individually influenced by pedicle or incision type, there was no statistically significant effect of surgical approach or complication rates on the average change of these scores, and overall satisfaction and well-being scores improved. This review suggests that any of the main surgical approaches to reduction mammoplasty provide equally substantial improvements in patient-reported satisfaction and quality of life, but more robust comparative studies would strengthen this area of research.

摘要

背景

尽管缩乳术的每种手术技术都有其公认的优点和缺点,但关于每种手术方法对患者生活质量和满意度影响的数据仍然有限。我们的研究旨在评估手术因素与缩乳术患者 BREAST-Q 评分之间的关系。

方法

通过 2021 年 8 月 6 日的文献综述,使用 PubMed 数据库选择使用 BREAST-Q 问卷评估缩乳术患者结局的出版物。排除研究乳房重建、乳房增大、肿瘤整形缩小或乳腺癌患者的研究。BREAST-Q 数据按切口模式和蒂型分层。

结果

我们确定了 14 篇符合选择标准的文章。在 1816 名患者中,平均年龄为 15.8 至 55 岁,平均体重指数为 22.5 至 32.4kg/m 2 ,双侧平均切除重量为 323 至 1845.96g。总体并发症发生率为 19.9%。平均而言,乳房满意度提高了 52.1±0.9 分(P<0.0001),社会心理幸福感提高了 43.0±1.0 分(P<0.0001),性功能幸福感提高了 38.2±1.2 分(P<0.0001),身体幸福感提高了 27.9±0.8 分(P<0.0001)。当以平均差异为模型时,与并发症发生率或超级内侧蒂使用率、下蒂使用率、Wise 模式切口或垂直模式切口的流行率之间没有观察到显著相关性。并发症发生率与术前、术后或 BREAST-Q 评分的平均变化无关。超级内侧蒂使用率与术后身体舒适度呈负相关(Spearman 等级相关系数[SRCC],-0.66742;P<0.05)。Wise 模式切口的流行率与术后性功能(SRCC,-0.66233;P<0.05)和身体舒适度(SRCC,-0.69521;P<0.05)呈负相关。

结论

尽管术前或术后 BREAST-Q 评分可能会受到蒂型或切口类型的单独影响,但手术方法或并发症发生率对这些评分的平均变化没有统计学意义,总体满意度和舒适度评分有所提高。本综述表明,缩乳术的任何主要手术方法都能显著改善患者报告的满意度和生活质量,但更有力的比较研究将加强这一研究领域。

相似文献

1
Are Surgical Approaches Correlated With BREAST-Q Score Improvements After Reduction Mammoplasty? A Systematic Review.乳房缩小术后手术入路与 BREAST-Q 评分改善是否相关?一项系统评价。
Ann Plast Surg. 2023 Jun 1;90(6S Suppl 5):S659-S666. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003445. Epub 2023 Mar 4.
2
A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient Factors on BREAST-Q Outcomes After Reduction Mammoplasty.患者因素对乳房缩小整形术后 BREAST-Q 结局影响的系统评价
Ann Plast Surg. 2023 Jun 1;90(6S Suppl 5):S667-S673. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003471. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
3
Age and Body Mass Index Affect Patient Satisfaction Following Reduction Mammoplasty: A Multicenter Study Using BREAST-Q.年龄和身体质量指数对乳房缩小术后患者满意度的影响:一项使用 BREAST-Q 的多中心研究。
Aesthet Surg J. 2021 May 18;41(6):NP336-NP345. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjaa395.
4
How do women perceive their breast image before and after bilateral therapeutic mammoplasty for early breast cancer?女性在接受双侧保乳术治疗早期乳腺癌前后如何看待自己的乳房形象?
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024 Apr;91:218-224. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.01.030. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
5
Do larger reductions yield larger returns? patient-reported outcomes as a function of specimen weight in bilateral reduction mammoplasty.更大的减少量是否会带来更大的回报?双侧乳房缩小成形术中标本重量对患者报告结局的影响。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Oct;74(10):2537-2549. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.03.032. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
6
Aesthetic, Quality-of-Life, and Clinical Outcomes after Inferior Pedicle Oncoplastic Reduction Mammoplasty.下蒂肿瘤整形缩小乳房术的美学、生活质量和临床效果。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Jun;47(3):905-911. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03257-7. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
7
Vertical Sculpted Pillar Reduction Mammaplasty in 317 Patients: Technique, Complications, and BREAST-Q Outcomes.317例患者的垂直雕塑柱状乳房缩小术:技术、并发症及BREAST-Q结果
Aesthet Surg J. 2016 Apr;36(4):417-30. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjv217. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
8
Patient-Reported Outcomes After Reduction Mammoplasty Using BREAST-Q: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.乳房缩小术后患者报告结局的 BREAST-Q 评估:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Aesthet Surg J. 2023 Mar 15;43(4):NP231-NP241. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjac293.
9
[Application of three-pedicle reduction mammaplasty in breast cancer patients with moderate or greater breast hypertrophy and/or moderate-to-severe breast ptosis].三蒂缩乳术在中重度乳房肥大和/或中重度乳房下垂乳腺癌患者中的应用
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Dec 15;35(12):1595-1602. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202107068.
10
Pedicle De-epithelialization in Reduction Mammoplasty: A Systematic Review of the Literature.缩乳术中的蒂部去上皮化:文献系统综述
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Feb;42(1):100-111. doi: 10.1007/s00266-017-1024-7. Epub 2017 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Vertical Breast Reduction Mammaplasty in the Adolescent Population.青少年人群中的垂直乳房缩小整形术
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Mar 18;13(3):e6614. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006614. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Feasibility and Safety of Superomedial Pedicle for Breast Reduction in Geriatric Patients.老年患者乳房缩小术中超内侧蒂的可行性和安全性。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Oct;48(19):3847-3854. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-03859-9. Epub 2024 Mar 15.