• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性在接受双侧保乳术治疗早期乳腺癌前后如何看待自己的乳房形象?

How do women perceive their breast image before and after bilateral therapeutic mammoplasty for early breast cancer?

机构信息

Department of Breast Surgery, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD2 1SG, UK.

Department of Breast Surgery, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD2 1SG, UK.

出版信息

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024 Apr;91:218-224. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.01.030. Epub 2024 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2024.01.030
PMID:38422923
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Bilateral therapeutic mammoplasty (BTM) is commonly performed in the UK during treatment for breast cancer, and the available data show oncological safety. This study aims to compare patient-recorded outcome measures before and after surgery, as well as associated patient factors.

METHODS

Between March 2018 and December 2019, patients undergoing BTM for breast cancer completed validated BREAST-Q reduction modules before and 3 months after surgery and a radiotherapy domain at 3 months. Scores were correlated with clinical data. For BREAST-Q scales, a higher score (0-100) represents greater satisfaction or quality of life.

RESULTS

28 patients were included, median age 58 years (IQR 52-64), BMI 32.0 (IQR 27.8-34.0). Of these, 1 had bilateral disease, 2 had multifocal disease, and the remaining had unilateral disease. Most (55%) underwent Wise pattern incision. At 3 months post-operatively, the following outcome scores improved based on the Wilcoxon signed-rank test: satisfaction with breasts (median 44 to 84; p < 0.001), psychosocial wellbeing (57.5 to 83; p < 0.001) and sexual wellbeing (48 to 61; p = 0.029). The improvement in satisfaction with breasts score correlated with the preoperative score (p = 0.011), with a larger increase in patients with a lower baseline score. Physical wellbeing was unchanged overall (median 71 to 72). In all solely post-operative domains (satisfaction with information, outcome, nipples and following radiation), patients reported high levels of satisfaction with outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients reported improved levels of patient-related quality of life measures after therapeutic mammoplasty, including satisfaction with breasts and psychosocial and sexual wellbeing, with high post-operative outcomes in satisfaction with outcome, information and nipples, as well as radiation Q-score.

摘要

简介

双侧治疗性乳房切除术(BTM)在英国常用于乳腺癌的治疗,现有数据显示其具有肿瘤安全性。本研究旨在比较手术前后患者记录的结果测量指标,以及相关的患者因素。

方法

在 2018 年 3 月至 2019 年 12 月期间,接受 BTM 治疗乳腺癌的患者在手术前和手术后 3 个月完成了经过验证的 BREAST-Q 减少模块,并在 3 个月时完成了放射治疗模块。评分与临床数据相关联。对于 BREAST-Q 量表,分数越高(0-100)代表满意度或生活质量越高。

结果

共纳入 28 例患者,中位年龄 58 岁(IQR 52-64),BMI 为 32.0(IQR 27.8-34.0)。其中,1 例为双侧疾病,2 例为多灶性疾病,其余为单侧疾病。大多数患者(55%)采用 Wise 模式切口。术后 3 个月,根据 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验,以下结果评分改善:乳房满意度(中位数 44 至 84;p<0.001)、心理社会健康状况(57.5 至 83;p<0.001)和性健康状况(48 至 61;p=0.029)。乳房满意度评分的改善与术前评分相关(p=0.011),基线评分较低的患者改善幅度更大。整体身体健康状况无变化(中位数 71 至 72)。在所有仅术后领域(对信息、结果、乳头和放疗的满意度),患者对结果的满意度报告均较高。

结论

BTM 治疗后,患者报告了更高水平的与患者相关的生活质量指标,包括对乳房的满意度以及心理社会和性健康状况,对结果、信息和乳头的满意度以及放射治疗 Q 评分的术后结果较高。

相似文献

1
How do women perceive their breast image before and after bilateral therapeutic mammoplasty for early breast cancer?女性在接受双侧保乳术治疗早期乳腺癌前后如何看待自己的乳房形象?
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024 Apr;91:218-224. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.01.030. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
2
A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient Factors on BREAST-Q Outcomes After Reduction Mammoplasty.患者因素对乳房缩小整形术后 BREAST-Q 结局影响的系统评价
Ann Plast Surg. 2023 Jun 1;90(6S Suppl 5):S667-S673. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003471. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
3
Age and cancer treatment factors influence patient-reported outcomes following therapeutic mammoplasty and contralateral symmetrisation for the treatment of breast cancer.年龄和癌症治疗因素影响乳腺癌治疗性乳房切除术和对侧对称化治疗后的患者报告结局。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Oct;74(10):2557-2564. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.03.031. Epub 2021 Mar 28.
4
Are Surgical Approaches Correlated With BREAST-Q Score Improvements After Reduction Mammoplasty? A Systematic Review.乳房缩小术后手术入路与 BREAST-Q 评分改善是否相关?一项系统评价。
Ann Plast Surg. 2023 Jun 1;90(6S Suppl 5):S659-S666. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003445. Epub 2023 Mar 4.
5
A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Conventional Mastectomy with Reconstruction.保乳术后与传统乳房切除术及重建术后患者报告结局的比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct;25(10):2909-2916. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6585-4. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
6
Bilateral mammoplasty for cancer: Surgical, oncological and patient-reported outcomes.双侧乳腺癌乳房成形术:手术、肿瘤学及患者报告结局
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Jan;43(1):68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.08.013. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
7
[Application of three-pedicle reduction mammaplasty in breast cancer patients with moderate or greater breast hypertrophy and/or moderate-to-severe breast ptosis].三蒂缩乳术在中重度乳房肥大和/或中重度乳房下垂乳腺癌患者中的应用
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Dec 15;35(12):1595-1602. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202107068.
8
Do larger reductions yield larger returns? patient-reported outcomes as a function of specimen weight in bilateral reduction mammoplasty.更大的减少量是否会带来更大的回报?双侧乳房缩小成形术中标本重量对患者报告结局的影响。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Oct;74(10):2537-2549. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.03.032. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
9
Three-Pedicle Reduction Mammaplasty Technique in the Treatment of Greater Breast Hypertrophy Patients With or Without Breast Cancer: Surgical and Patient-reported outcomes.三蒂乳房缩小术治疗伴或不伴乳腺癌的巨乳症患者:手术和患者报告的结果。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Dec;47(6):2221-2231. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03285-3. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
10
Patient satisfaction with nipple-sparing mastectomy: A prospective study of patient reported outcomes using the BREAST-Q.患者对保留乳头的乳房切除术的满意度:一项使用BREAST-Q对患者报告结局的前瞻性研究。
J Surg Oncol. 2016 Sep;114(4):416-22. doi: 10.1002/jso.24364. Epub 2016 Jul 8.