• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A propensity score matching analysis: Impact of senior resident versus fellow participation on outcomes of complex surgical oncology.倾向性评分匹配分析:资深住院医师与研究员参与对复杂肿瘤外科学治疗结果的影响。
Surg Oncol. 2023 Jun;48:101925. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2023.101925. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
2
Is resident assistance equivalent to fellows during hepatectomy?肝切除术时住院医师助理等同于专科进修医师吗?
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jan;35(1):260-269. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07388-9. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
3
Impact of fellow compared to resident assistance on outcomes of minimally invasive surgery.同行协助与住院医师协助对微创手术结果的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Feb;36(2):1554-1562. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08444-8. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
4
Trainee-associated outcomes in laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: propensity score analysis accounting for operative time, procedure complexity and patient comorbidity.腹腔镜结直肠癌手术中与受训者相关的结果:考虑手术时间、手术复杂性和患者合并症的倾向评分分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb;32(2):702-711. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5726-3. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
5
Resident and Fellow Participation in Breast Surgery: An American College of Surgeons NSQIP Clinical Outcomes Analysis.住院医师和研究员参与乳腺手术:美国外科医师学会NSQIP临床结果分析。
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Nov;221(5):988-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.08.008. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
6
NSQIP Analysis of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Rates for Breast Cancer: Implications for Resident and Fellow Participation.乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结清扫率的NSQIP分析:对住院医师和研究员参与的影响
J Surg Educ. 2018 Sep-Oct;75(5):1281-1286. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.02.020. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
7
Resident and fellow participation in Thyroid and Parathyroid surgery: an ACS-NSQIP clinical outcomes analysis.住院医师和研究员参与甲状腺和甲状旁腺手术:一项美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划临床结果分析。
J Surg Res. 2017 Dec;220:346-352. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.07.030. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
8
Impact of Fellow Versus Resident Assistance on Outcomes Following Pancreatoduodenectomy.胰腺十二指肠切除术后住院医师与专科住院医师协助对手术结果的影响
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Jun;21(6):1025-1030. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3383-4. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
9
The impact of surgical resident participation in breast reduction surgery--outcome analysis from the 2005-2011 ACS-NSQIP datasets.外科住院医师参与乳房缩小手术的影响——来自2005 - 2011年美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS - NSQIP)数据集的结果分析
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2014 Oct;48(5):315-21. doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2014.882345. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
10
Fellow Versus Resident: Graduate Medical Education and Patient Outcomes After Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion Surgery.术者与住院医师资历对比:颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后的住院医师规范化培训与患者结局。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 May 1;28(9):e401-e407. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00645.

本文引用的文献

1
Augmented reality (AR) in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) training: where are we now in Italy? The Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery (SICE) ARMIS survey.微创手术(MIS)培训中的增强现实(AR)技术:意大利目前的情况如何?意大利内镜外科学会(SICE)的ARMIS调查。
Updates Surg. 2023 Jan;75(1):85-93. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01383-6. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
2
The effect of operative duration on the outcome of colon cancer procedures.手术时间对结肠癌手术结果的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jul;36(7):5076-5083. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08871-7. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
3
Trends in General Surgery Operative Experience Obtained by Integrated Vascular Surgery Residents.血管外科住院医师综合培训获得的普通外科手术经验趋势。
J Surg Educ. 2021 Nov-Dec;78(6):2127-2137. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.05.010. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
4
Impact of fellow compared to resident assistance on outcomes of minimally invasive surgery.同行协助与住院医师协助对微创手术结果的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Feb;36(2):1554-1562. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08444-8. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
5
Operative Duration and Short-Term Postoperative Complications after Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.单髁膝关节置换术后的手术持续时间和短期术后并发症。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Mar;36(3):905-909. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.09.007. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Development of a surgical oncology training curriculum for accreditation.外科肿瘤学培训课程的制定与认证。
J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jul;122(1):15-20. doi: 10.1002/jso.25933. Epub 2020 May 18.
7
The impact of surgical simulation on patient outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.手术模拟对患者预后的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2021 Apr;44(2):843-854. doi: 10.1007/s10143-020-01314-2. Epub 2020 May 13.
8
Is resident assistance equivalent to fellows during hepatectomy?肝切除术时住院医师助理等同于专科进修医师吗?
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jan;35(1):260-269. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07388-9. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
9
Does Perceived Resident Operative Autonomy Impact Patient Outcomes?患者感知的住院医师手术自主性是否会影响患者结局?
J Surg Educ. 2019 Nov-Dec;76(6):e182-e188. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
10
Impact of Resident and Fellow Participation on Surgical Outcomes in Breast Conserving Surgery for Invasive Breast Cancer.住院医师和研究员参与对浸润性乳腺癌保乳手术手术结果的影响。
J Surg Educ. 2020 Jan-Feb;77(1):144-149. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.07.014. Epub 2019 Aug 1.

倾向性评分匹配分析:资深住院医师与研究员参与对复杂肿瘤外科学治疗结果的影响。

A propensity score matching analysis: Impact of senior resident versus fellow participation on outcomes of complex surgical oncology.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Surg Oncol. 2023 Jun;48:101925. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2023.101925. Epub 2023 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.suronc.2023.101925
PMID:36913848
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10200751/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Teaching hospitals that train both general surgery residents and fellows in complex general surgical oncology have become more common. This study investigates whether participation of a senior resident versus a fellow has an impact on outcomes of patients undergoing complex cancer surgery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent esophagectomy, gastrectomy, hepatectomy, or pancreatectomy between 2007 and 2012 with assistance from a senior resident (post-graduate years 4-5) or a fellow (post-graduate years 6-8) were identified from the ACS NSQIP. Based on age, sex, body mass index, ASA classification, diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, and smoking status, propensity-scores were created for odds of undergoing the operation assisted by a fellow. Patients were matched 1:1 based on propensity score. Postoperative outcomes including risk of major complication were compared after matching.

RESULTS

In total, 6934 esophagectomies, 13,152 gastrectomies, 4927 hepatectomies, and 8040 pancreatectomies were performed with assistance of a senior resident or fellow. After matching, overall rates of major complications were equivalent across all four anatomic locations between cases performed with the participation of a senior resident versus a surgical fellow: esophagectomy (37.0%% vs 31.6%, p = 0.10), gastrectomy (22.6% vs 22.3%, p = 0.93), hepatectomy (15.8% v 16.0%, p = 0.91), and pancreatectomy (23.9% vs 25.2%, p = 0.48). Operative time was shorter for gastrectomy (212 vs. 232 min; p = 0.004) involving a resident compared to a fellow, but comparable for esophagectomy (330 vs. 336 min; p = 0.41), hepatectomy (217 vs. 219 min; p = 0.85), and pancreatectomy (320 vs. 330 min; p = 0.43).

CONCLUSIONS

Senior resident participation in complex cancer operations does not appear to negatively impact operative time or postoperative outcomes. Future research is needed to further assess this domain of surgical practice and education, particularly with regard to case selection and operative complexity.

摘要

背景

培训普通外科住院医师和外科住院医师的教学医院在复杂普通外科肿瘤学方面变得越来越普遍。本研究调查了高级住院医师与住院医师参与复杂癌症手术对患者结局的影响。

方法

从 ACS NSQIP 中确定了 2007 年至 2012 年期间接受食管切除术、胃切除术、肝切除术或胰腺切除术并由高年级住院医师(研究生第 4-5 年)或住院医师(研究生第 6-8 年)协助的患者。根据年龄、性别、体重指数、ASA 分类、糖尿病诊断和吸烟状况,为接受住院医师协助手术的可能性创建倾向评分。根据倾向评分对患者进行 1:1 匹配。匹配后比较术后主要并发症风险。

结果

共有 6934 例食管切除术、13152 例胃切除术、4927 例肝切除术和 8040 例胰腺切除术由高年级住院医师或住院医师协助完成。匹配后,在所有四个解剖部位,由高级住院医师参与的病例与由外科住院医师参与的病例的主要并发症总体发生率相当:食管切除术(37.0% 比 31.6%,p=0.10),胃切除术(22.6% 比 22.3%,p=0.93),肝切除术(15.8% 比 16.0%,p=0.91),和胰腺切除术(23.9% 比 25.2%,p=0.48)。与住院医师相比,胃切除术(212 分钟比 232 分钟;p=0.004)的手术时间更短,但与食管切除术(330 分钟比 336 分钟;p=0.41),肝切除术(217 分钟比 219 分钟;p=0.85)和胰腺切除术(320 分钟比 330 分钟;p=0.43)的手术时间相当。

结论

高级住院医师参与复杂癌症手术似乎不会对手术时间或术后结果产生负面影响。需要进一步研究来进一步评估这一外科实践和教育领域,特别是在病例选择和手术复杂性方面。