• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年肝细胞癌患者手术切除后的特征与结局:系统评价与Meta分析

Characteristics and Outcomes of Elderly Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients following Surgical Resection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Garcia Elizabeth M, Nerurkar Sanjna N, Tan Eunice X, Tan Shaun Y S, Peck Ern-Wei, Quek Sabrina X Z, Teh Readon, Teng Margaret, Tran Andrew, Yeo Ee Jin, Le Michael, Wong Connie, Cheung Ramsey, Huang Daniel Q

机构信息

Mountain View High School, Mountain View, California, USA.

Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Dig Dis. 2025;43(2):206-214. doi: 10.1159/000530101. Epub 2023 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1159/000530101
PMID:36913917
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11965816/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Due to aging of the global population, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasingly common among elderly patients, but outcomes after curative hepatic resection are unclear. Using a metanalytic approach, we aimed to estimate overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and complication rates in elderly HCC patients undergoing resection.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception to November 10, 2020, for studies reporting outcomes in elderly (age ≥65 years) patients with HCC undergoing curative surgical resection. Pooled estimates were generated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

We screened 8,598 articles and included 42 studies (7,778 elderly patients). The mean age was 74.45 years (95% CI: 72.89-76.02), 75.54% were male (95% CI: 72.53-78.32) and 66.73% had cirrhosis (95% CI: 43.93-83.96). The mean tumor size was 5.50 cm (95% CI: 4.71-6.29) and 16.01% had multiple tumors (95% CI: 10.74-23.19). The 1-year (86.02% vs. 86.66%, p = 0.84) and 5-year OS (51.60% vs. 53.78%) between non-elderly and elderly patients were similar. Likewise, there were no differences in the 1-year (67.32% vs. 73.26%, p = 0.11) and 5-year RFS (31.57% vs. 30.25%, p = 0.67) between non-elderly and elderly patients. There was a higher rate of minor complications (21.95% vs. 13.71%, p = 0.03) among elderly patients compared with non-elderly patients, but no difference in major complications (p = 0.43).

CONCLUSION

These data show that OS, recurrence, and major complications after liver resection for HCC are comparable between elderly and non-elderly patients and may inform clinical management of HCC in this population.

BACKGROUND

Due to aging of the global population, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasingly common among elderly patients, but outcomes after curative hepatic resection are unclear. Using a metanalytic approach, we aimed to estimate overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and complication rates in elderly HCC patients undergoing resection.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception to November 10, 2020, for studies reporting outcomes in elderly (age ≥65 years) patients with HCC undergoing curative surgical resection. Pooled estimates were generated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

We screened 8,598 articles and included 42 studies (7,778 elderly patients). The mean age was 74.45 years (95% CI: 72.89-76.02), 75.54% were male (95% CI: 72.53-78.32) and 66.73% had cirrhosis (95% CI: 43.93-83.96). The mean tumor size was 5.50 cm (95% CI: 4.71-6.29) and 16.01% had multiple tumors (95% CI: 10.74-23.19). The 1-year (86.02% vs. 86.66%, p = 0.84) and 5-year OS (51.60% vs. 53.78%) between non-elderly and elderly patients were similar. Likewise, there were no differences in the 1-year (67.32% vs. 73.26%, p = 0.11) and 5-year RFS (31.57% vs. 30.25%, p = 0.67) between non-elderly and elderly patients. There was a higher rate of minor complications (21.95% vs. 13.71%, p = 0.03) among elderly patients compared with non-elderly patients, but no difference in major complications (p = 0.43).

CONCLUSION

These data show that OS, recurrence, and major complications after liver resection for HCC are comparable between elderly and non-elderly patients and may inform clinical management of HCC in this population.

摘要

背景

由于全球人口老龄化,肝细胞癌(HCC)在老年患者中越来越常见,但根治性肝切除术后的结果尚不清楚。我们采用荟萃分析方法,旨在评估接受肝切除的老年HCC患者的总生存期(OS)、无复发生存期(RFS)和并发症发生率。

方法

我们检索了从数据库建立至2020年11月10日的PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库,以查找报告接受根治性手术切除的老年(年龄≥65岁)HCC患者结局的研究。使用随机效应模型生成汇总估计值。

结果

我们筛选了8598篇文章,纳入了42项研究(7778例老年患者)。平均年龄为74.45岁(95%置信区间:72.89 - 76.02),75.54%为男性(95%置信区间:72.53 - 78.32),66.73%有肝硬化(95%置信区间:43.93 - 83.96)。平均肿瘤大小为5.50 cm(95%置信区间:4.71 - 6.29),16.01%有多个肿瘤(95%置信区间:10.74 - 23.19)。非老年患者和老年患者的1年总生存率(86.02%对86.66%,p = 0.84)和5年总生存率(51.60%对53.78%)相似。同样,非老年患者和老年患者的1年无复发生存率(67.32%对73.26%,p = 0.11)和5年无复发生存率(31.57%对30.25%,p = 0.67)也没有差异。与非老年患者相比,老年患者的轻微并发症发生率更高(21.95%对13.71%,p = 0.03),但严重并发症发生率没有差异(p = 0.43)。

结论

这些数据表明,老年和非老年患者肝癌肝切除术后的总生存期、复发情况和严重并发症相当,这可能为该人群肝癌的临床管理提供参考。

背景

由于全球人口老龄化,肝细胞癌(HCC)在老年患者中越来越常见,但根治性肝切除术后的结果尚不清楚。我们采用荟萃分析方法,旨在评估接受肝切除的老年HCC患者的总生存期(OS)、无复发生存期(RFS)和并发症发生率。

方法

我们检索了从数据库建立至202年11月10日的PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库,以查找报告接受根治性手术切除的老年(年龄≥65岁)HCC患者结局的研究。使用随机效应模型生成汇总估计值。

结果

我们筛选了8598篇文章,纳入了42项研究(7778例老年患者)。平均年龄为74.45岁(95%置信区间:72.89 - 76.02),75.54%为男性(95%置信区间:72.53 - 78.32),66.73%有肝硬化(95%置信区间:43.93 - 83.96)。平均肿瘤大小为5.50 cm(95%置信区间:4.71 - 6.29),16.01%有多个肿瘤(95%置信区间:10.74 - 23.19)。非老年患者和老年患者的1年总生存率(86.02%对86.66%,p = 0.84)和5年总生存率(51.60%对53.任8%)相似。同样,非老年患者和老年患者的1年无复发生存率(67.32%对73.26%,p = 0.11)和5年无复发生存率(31.57%对30.25%,p = 0.67)也没有差异。与非老年患者相比,老年患者的轻微并发症发生率更高(21.95%对13.71%,p = 0.03),但严重并发症发生率没有差异(p = 0.43)。

结论

这些数据表明,老年和非老年患者肝癌肝切除术后的总生存期、复发情况和严重并发症相当,这可能为该人群肝癌的临床管理提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/275a/11965816/aebd4c546778/ddi-2025-0043-0002-530101_F02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/275a/11965816/db56062af9eb/ddi-2025-0043-0002-530101_F01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/275a/11965816/aebd4c546778/ddi-2025-0043-0002-530101_F02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/275a/11965816/db56062af9eb/ddi-2025-0043-0002-530101_F01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/275a/11965816/aebd4c546778/ddi-2025-0043-0002-530101_F02.jpg

相似文献

1
Characteristics and Outcomes of Elderly Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients following Surgical Resection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.老年肝细胞癌患者手术切除后的特征与结局:系统评价与Meta分析
Dig Dis. 2025;43(2):206-214. doi: 10.1159/000530101. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
2
Global and regional long-term survival following resection for HCC in the recent decade: A meta-analysis of 110 studies.近十年肝癌切除术后的全球和区域长期生存:110 项研究的荟萃分析。
Hepatol Commun. 2022 Jul;6(7):1813-1826. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1923. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
3
Transarterial chemoembolization versus hepatic resection in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment: a meta-analysis.经动脉化疗栓塞术与肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015 Aug 10;9:4431-40. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S86629. eCollection 2015.
4
Tumor size does not independently affect long-term survival after curative resection of solitary hepatocellular carcinoma without macroscopic vascular invasion.肿瘤大小不独立影响无肉眼血管侵犯的单发肝细胞癌根治性切除术后的长期生存。
World J Surg. 2014 Apr;38(4):947-57. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2365-2.
5
Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors of elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing hepatectomy.老年肝细胞癌患者肝切除术后的长期结局及预后因素
J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Sep;13(9):1627-35. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-0933-4. Epub 2009 Jun 9.
6
Hepatocellular carcinoma in the elderly: Meta-analysis and systematic literature review.老年肝细胞癌:荟萃分析与系统文献综述
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Nov 14;21(42):12197-210. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i42.12197.
7
Systematic review of outcomes and meta-analysis of risk factors for prognosis after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma without cirrhosis.系统评价和预后因素荟萃分析:无肝硬化肝细胞癌肝切除术后的结果。
Asian J Surg. 2021 Jan;44(1):36-45. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.08.019. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
8
Long-Term Survival Outcomes After Liver Resection for Binodular Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Cohort Study.多中心队列研究:肝切除治疗双叶型肝细胞肝癌的长期生存结果。
Oncologist. 2019 Aug;24(8):e730-e739. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0898. Epub 2019 May 24.
9
Resection or transplantation for early hepatocellular carcinoma in a cirrhotic liver: does size define the best oncological strategy?肝硬化患者的早期肝细胞癌切除或移植:大小是否决定最佳的肿瘤学策略?
Ann Surg. 2012 Dec;256(6):883-91. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318273bad0.
10
Clinical outcome of small hepatocellular carcinoma after different treatments: a meta-analysis.不同治疗方法后小肝细胞癌的临床结局:一项荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Aug 7;20(29):10174-82. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i29.10174.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly and adolescent/young adult populations.老年及青少年/青年人群肝细胞癌的管理
J Liver Cancer. 2025 Mar;25(1):52-66. doi: 10.17998/jlc.2025.02.28. Epub 2025 Mar 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of nationwide hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance on the prognosis in patients with chronic liver disease.全国性肝细胞癌监测对慢性肝病患者预后的影响。
Clin Mol Hepatol. 2022 Oct;28(4):851-863. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2022.0037. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
2
Global burden of liver cancer in males and females: Changing etiological basis and the growing contribution of NASH.男性和女性肝癌的全球负担:病因基础的变化及非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)的贡献日益增加。
Hepatology. 2023 Apr 1;77(4):1150-1163. doi: 10.1002/hep.32758. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
3
Changing global epidemiology of liver cancer from 2010 to 2019: NASH is the fastest growing cause of liver cancer.
2010 年至 2019 年全球肝癌流行病学变化:NASH 是肝癌增长最快的病因。
Cell Metab. 2022 Jul 5;34(7):969-977.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2022.05.003. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
4
Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Tenofovir vs Entecavir Treatment for Chronic Hepatitis B Virus: A Reconstructed Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis.替诺福韦与恩替卡韦治疗慢性乙型肝炎病毒的肝细胞癌风险:一项重建的个体患者数据荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2219407. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.19407.
5
Liver resection versus liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria: a meta-analysis of 18,421 patients.米兰标准内肝细胞癌的肝切除术与肝移植术对比:18421例患者的荟萃分析
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2022 Feb;11(1):78-93. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-21-350.
6
Clinical characteristics, surveillance, treatment allocation, and outcomes of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease-related hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非酒精性脂肪性肝病相关肝细胞癌的临床特征、监测、治疗分配和结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Apr;23(4):521-530. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00078-X. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
7
Global and regional long-term survival following resection for HCC in the recent decade: A meta-analysis of 110 studies.近十年肝癌切除术后的全球和区域长期生存:110 项研究的荟萃分析。
Hepatol Commun. 2022 Jul;6(7):1813-1826. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1923. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
8
UNOS Down-Staging Criteria for Liver Transplantation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 25 Studies.UNOS 肝癌肝移植降期标准:25 项研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Jun;21(6):1475-1484. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.02.018. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
9
Transcriptome-Wide Analysis of Human Liver Reveals Age-Related Differences in the Expression of Select Functional Gene Clusters and Evidence for a PPP1R10-Governed 'Aging Cascade'.人类肝脏的全转录组分析揭示了特定功能基因簇表达中与年龄相关的差异以及由PPP1R10调控的“衰老级联反应”的证据。
Pharmaceutics. 2021 Nov 25;13(12):2009. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13122009.
10
2019 Global NAFLD Prevalence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.2019 年全球非酒精性脂肪性肝病患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Dec;20(12):2809-2817.e28. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.12.002. Epub 2021 Dec 7.