Suppr超能文献

针刺治疗女性应激性尿失禁的疗效和安全性:四项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

The Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture in Treating Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women from a Meta-Analysis of Four Randomized Controlled Trials.

机构信息

Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 266000 Qingdao, Shandong, China.

Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, 264000 Yantai, Shandong, China.

出版信息

Arch Esp Urol. 2023 Feb;76(1):40-49. doi: 10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20237601.3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To verify the efficacy and safety of acupuncture in treating stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women in a single treatment cycle lasting at least 6 weeks.

METHODS

A preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) summary was followed correctly. Through the use of EMBASE, Cochrane Library databases, and PubMed (until July 2021), we looked for randomized controlled trials. In addition, the included articles' original references were looked up as well.

RESULTS

Totally, we analyzed four studies including 690 patients. Compared with the sham acupuncture group, this analysis verified that acupuncture was critically better result in decreasing mean urine leakage ( = 0.04), 1-hour pad test ( = 0.04), 72-hour incontinence episodes ( < 0.00001), International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form scores ( = 0.0005) and improving patient self-evaluation (All < 0.05). However, two groups had no statistical significance in improving pelvic floor muscle strength. In the matter of safety, mainly adverse events, especially with respect to pain, both groups showed no statistical difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Acupuncture is more beneficial to patients with stress urinary incontinence in women with no critical difference in the incidence of advent events than sham acupuncture.

摘要

目的

验证单次治疗周期至少 6 周的针灸治疗女性压力性尿失禁(SUI)的疗效和安全性。

方法

正确遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)摘要。通过使用 EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆数据库和 PubMed(截至 2021 年 7 月),我们查找了随机对照试验。此外,还查阅了纳入文章的原始参考文献。

结果

共分析了 4 项研究,包括 690 名患者。与假针灸组相比,该分析证实针灸在减少平均尿漏( = 0.04)、1 小时垫试验( = 0.04)、72 小时失禁发作( < 0.00001)、国际尿失禁咨询问卷-短表评分( = 0.0005)和改善患者自我评估方面具有显著更好的结果(所有 < 0.05)。然而,两组在改善盆底肌肉力量方面没有统计学意义。关于安全性,主要是不良事件,特别是疼痛方面,两组均无统计学差异。

结论

与假针灸相比,针灸对女性压力性尿失禁患者更有益,不良事件发生率无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验