• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于性别的急诊科急性腹痛评估和管理差异:回顾性审计。

Gender-based differences in assessment and management of acute abdominal pain in the emergency department: A retrospective audit.

机构信息

Cabrini Health, The Patricia Peck Education and Research Precinct, Australia; Epworth HealthCare, Emergency Department, Richmond, Victoria, Australia.

Deakin University, Institute of Health Transformation, Centre for Quality and Safety Research, Epworth HealthCare, Deakin University Partnership, Australia; Deakin University, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Australas Emerg Care. 2023 Dec;26(4):290-295. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2023.03.001. Epub 2023 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.auec.2023.03.001
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous research has identified gender-based differences in acute pain management in the emergency department [ED]. The aim of this study was to compare pharmacological management of acute abdominal pain in the ED by gender.

METHODS

A retrospective chart audit was conducted at one private metropolitan ED including adult patients (18-80 years) who presented with acute abdominal pain in 2019. Exclusion criteria included: pregnancy, repeat presentation within the study period, pain-free at initial medical review or documented refusal of analgesia, and oligo-analgesia. Comparisons by gender included: (1) analgesia type and (2) time to analgesia. Bivariate analysis was undertaken using SPSS.

RESULTS

There were 192 participants: 61 (31.6 %) men and 131 (67.9 %) women. Men were more likely to get combined opioid and non-opioid medication as first line analgesia (men: 26.2 % n = 16; women: 14.5 % n = 19, p = .049). Median time from ED presentation to analgesia was 80 min for men (IQR: 60) versus 94 min for women (IQR: 58), (p = .119). Women (25.2 % n = 33) were more likely to receive their first analgesic after 90 min from ED presentation compared to men versus men (11.5 %, n = 7 p = .029). In addition, women waited longer before receiving second analgesia (women: 94, men: 30 min, p = .032).

CONCLUSION

Findings confirm there are differences in pharmacological management of acute abdominal pain in the ED. Larger studies are required to further explore differences observed in this study.

摘要

背景

先前的研究已经确定了急诊科急性疼痛管理方面的性别差异。本研究的目的是比较急诊科急性腹痛的药物治疗管理情况。

方法

对一家私人大都市急诊室进行回顾性图表审查,纳入 2019 年出现急性腹痛的成年患者(18-80 岁)。排除标准包括:妊娠、研究期间重复就诊、首次医疗评估时无痛或有记录的拒绝镇痛、以及镇痛不足。按性别进行比较包括:(1)镇痛类型和(2)镇痛时间。采用 SPSS 进行双变量分析。

结果

共有 192 名参与者:61 名(31.6%)男性和 131 名(67.9%)女性。男性更有可能首先使用阿片类药物和非阿片类药物联合治疗作为一线镇痛药物(男性:26.2%,n=16;女性:14.5%,n=19,p=0.049)。男性从急诊就诊到接受镇痛的中位数时间为 80 分钟(IQR:60),而女性为 94 分钟(IQR:58),(p=0.119)。与男性相比,女性在急诊就诊后 90 分钟后更有可能接受首次镇痛(女性:25.2%,n=33;男性:11.5%,n=7,p=0.029)。此外,女性在接受第二次镇痛之前等待的时间更长(女性:94 分钟,男性:30 分钟,p=0.032)。

结论

研究结果证实了急诊科急性腹痛药物治疗管理方面存在差异。需要更大的研究来进一步探讨本研究中观察到的差异。

相似文献

1
Gender-based differences in assessment and management of acute abdominal pain in the emergency department: A retrospective audit.基于性别的急诊科急性腹痛评估和管理差异:回顾性审计。
Australas Emerg Care. 2023 Dec;26(4):290-295. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2023.03.001. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
2
Gender disparity in analgesic treatment of emergency department patients with acute abdominal pain.急诊科急性腹痛患者镇痛治疗中的性别差异。
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 May;15(5):414-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00100.x.
3
Racial disparity in analgesic treatment for ED patients with abdominal or back pain.ED 患者伴腹痛或背痛时,在镇痛治疗方面存在种族差异。
Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Sep;29(7):752-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.02.023. Epub 2010 May 1.
4
Factors that affect pain management in adults diagnosed with acute appendicitis in the emergency department: A retrospective study.影响急诊科诊断为急性阑尾炎的成人疼痛管理的因素:一项回顾性研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Sep;71:31-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.05.038. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
5
Racial Disparities in Opioid Analgesia Administration Among Adult Emergency Department Patients with Abdominal Pain.种族差异与成人腹痛患者阿片类镇痛药使用的相关性分析。
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Oct 24;23(6):826-831. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.8.55750.
6
Gender, age and ethnic aspects of analgesia in acute abdominal pain: is analgesia even across the groups?急性腹痛镇痛中的性别、年龄和种族问题:不同人群的镇痛效果是否一致?
Intern Med J. 2012 Mar;42(3):281-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2010.02255.x. Epub 2010 May 11.
7
Older age and risk for delayed abdominal pain care in the emergency department.年龄较大与急诊科腹痛延迟治疗的风险。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2024 Oct 1;31(5):332-338. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001143. Epub 2024 May 27.
8
Time to analgesia for care delivered by nurse practitioners in the emergency department – a retrospective chart audit.急诊科执业护士提供护理后达到镇痛的时间——一项回顾性病历审核。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2015 Apr;23(2):71-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2014.07.002. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
9
Outcomes of a nurse-initiated intravenous analgesic protocol for abdominal pain in an emergency department: A quasi-experimental study.护士主导的急诊腹痛静脉镇痛方案的效果:一项准实验研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Jan;48(1):13-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.06.003. Epub 2010 Jul 3.
10
Efficacy of patient-controlled analgesia for patients with acute abdominal pain in the emergency department: a randomized trial.急诊患者中患者自控镇痛对急性腹痛的疗效:一项随机试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Apr;19(4):370-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01322.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends and Disparities in Appendicitis-Related Mortality Across U.S. Demographics and Regions: A 22-Year CDC WONDER Database Study.美国不同人口统计学特征和地区阑尾炎相关死亡率的趋势与差异:一项为期22年的疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)WONDER数据库研究
World J Surg. 2025 Jul 28. doi: 10.1002/wjs.70023.
2
Evaluating the role of palliative care in emergency department opioid use among advanced cancer patients.评估姑息治疗在晚期癌症患者急诊科使用阿片类药物中的作用。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jul 19;33(8):706. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09711-3.
3
Retrospective analysis of admissions to the emergency department of an urban state hospital: A cross-sectional study of 5,279,630 patient visits (2019-2024).
城市公立医院急诊科入院情况的回顾性分析:一项对5279630次患者就诊(2019 - 2024年)的横断面研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Feb 28;104(9):e41669. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041669.