Sangal Rohit B, Rothenberg Craig, Hawk Kathryn, D'Onofrio Gail, Hsiao Allen L, Solad Yauheni, Venkatesh Arjun K
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2023 May;49(5):239-246. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.01.013. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
Prior work on opioid prescribing has examined dosing defaults, interruptive alerts, or "harder" stops such as electronic prescribing of controlled substances (EPCS), which has become increasingly required by state policy. Given that real-world opioid stewardship policies are concurrent and overlapping, the authors examined the effect of such policies on emergency department (ED) opioid prescriptions.
The researchers performed observational analysis of all ED visits discharged between December 17, 2016, and December 31, 2019, across seven EDs of a hospital system. Four interventions were examined in chronological order, with each successive intervention added on top of all previous interventions: 12-pill prescription default, EPCS, electronic health record (EHR) pop-up alert, and 8-pill prescription default. The primary outcome was opioid prescribing, which was described as number of opioid prescriptions per 100 discharged ED visits and modeled as a binary outcome for each visit. Secondary outcomes included prescription morphine milligram equivalents (MME) and non-opioid analgesia prescriptions.
A total of 775,692 ED visits were included in the study. Compared to the preintervention period, cumulative reductions in opioid prescribing were seen with incremental interventions, including after adding a 12-pill default (odds ratio [OR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82-0.94), after adding EPCS (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.63-0.77), after adding pop-up alerts (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.63-0.71), and after adding an 8-pill default (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.58-0.65).
EHR-implemented solutions such as EPCS, pop-up alerts, and pill defaults had varying but significant effects on reducing ED opioid prescribing. Policy makers and quality improvement leaders might achieve sustainable improvements in opioid stewardship while balancing clinician alert fatigue through policy efforts promoting implementation of EPCS and default dispense quantities.
先前关于阿片类药物处方的研究探讨了剂量默认值、中断式警报或诸如受控物质电子处方(EPCS)等“更严格”的限制措施,而州政策对EPCS的要求日益增加。鉴于现实世界中的阿片类药物管理政策是并行且相互重叠的,作者研究了此类政策对急诊科(ED)阿片类药物处方的影响。
研究人员对2016年12月17日至2019年12月31日期间医院系统的七个急诊科所有出院的急诊就诊病例进行了观察性分析。按时间顺序对四种干预措施进行了研究,每种后续干预措施都叠加在之前所有干预措施之上:12片处方默认值、EPCS、电子健康记录(EHR)弹出警报和8片处方默认值。主要结果是阿片类药物处方,以每100例出院急诊就诊的阿片类药物处方数量来描述,并将每次就诊作为二元结果进行建模。次要结果包括处方吗啡毫克当量(MME)和非阿片类镇痛处方。
该研究共纳入了775,692例急诊就诊病例。与干预前时期相比,随着干预措施的逐步增加,阿片类药物处方量出现了累积减少,包括在添加12片默认值后(优势比[OR]0.88,95%置信区间[CI]0.82 - 0.94)、添加EPCS后(OR 0.7,95%CI 0.63 - 0.77)、添加弹出警报后(OR 0.67,95%CI 0.63 - 0.71)以及添加8片默认值后(OR 0.61,95%CI 0.58 - 0.65)。
诸如EPCS、弹出警报和药丸默认值等通过电子健康记录实施的解决方案对减少急诊科阿片类药物处方有不同但显著的影响。政策制定者和质量改进负责人可以通过推动EPCS实施和默认配药量的政策努力,在平衡临床医生警报疲劳的同时,实现阿片类药物管理的可持续改进。