• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实用急诊科干预可减少阿片类药物片剂的默认开药量。

Pragmatic Emergency Department Intervention Reducing Default Quantity of Opioid Tablets Prescribed.

机构信息

University of California San Francisco, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Francisco, California.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2024 Jul;25(4):449-456. doi: 10.5811/westjem.18040.

DOI:10.5811/westjem.18040
PMID:39028229
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11254152/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The opioid epidemic is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Prior work has shown that emergency department (ED) opioid prescribing can increase the incidence of opioid use disorder in a dose-dependent manner, and systemic changes that decrease default quantity of discharge opioid tablets in the electronic health record (EHR) can impact prescribing practices. However, ED leadership may be interested in the impact of communication around the intervention as well as whether the intervention may differentially impact different types of clinicians (physicians, physician assistants [PA], and nurse practitioners). We implemented and evaluated a quality improvement intervention of an announced decrease in EHR default quantities of commonly prescribed opioids at a large, academic, urban, tertiary-care ED.

METHODS

We gathered EHR data on all ED discharges with opioid prescriptions from January 1, 2019-December 6, 2021, including chief complaint, clinician, and opioid prescription details. Data was captured and analyzed on a monthly basis throughout this time period. On March 29, 2021, we implemented an announced decrease in EHR default dispense quantities from 20 tablets to 12 tablets for commonly prescribed opioids. We measured pre- and post-intervention quantities of opioid tablets prescribed per discharge receiving opioids, distribution by patient demographics, and inter-clinician variability in prescribing behavior.

RESULTS

The EHR change was associated with a 14% decrease in quantity of opioid tablets per discharge receiving opioids, from 14 to 12 tablets ( = <.001). We found no statistically significant disparities in prescriptions based on self-reported patient race ( = 0.68) or gender ( = 0.65). Nurse practitioners and PAs prescribed more opioids per encounter than physicians on average and had a statistically significant decrease in opioid prescriptions associated with the EHR change. Physicians had a lesser but still significant drop in opioid prescribing in the post-intervention period.

CONCLUSION

Decreasing EHR defaults is a robust, simple tool for decreasing opioid prescriptions, with potential for implementation in the 42% of EDs nationwide that have defaults exceeding the recommended 12-tablet supply. Considering significant inter-clinician variability, future interventions to decrease opioid prescriptions should examine the effects of combining EHR default changes with targeted interventions for clinician groups or individual clinicians.

摘要

简介

阿片类药物泛滥是美国发病率和死亡率的主要原因。先前的研究表明,急诊室(ED)阿片类药物的开具与阿片类药物使用障碍的发生率呈剂量依赖性相关,并且电子健康记录(EHR)中减少默认出院阿片类药物片数的系统变化可能会影响开具处方的行为。然而,ED 领导层可能会关注干预措施的沟通效果,以及该干预措施是否会对不同类型的临床医生(医生、医师助理(PA)和执业护士)产生不同的影响。我们在一家大型、学术性、城市性、三级保健 ED 实施并评估了一项关于宣布减少常用阿片类药物 EHR 默认剂量的质量改进干预措施。

方法

我们收集了 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 6 日期间所有开具阿片类药物处方的 ED 出院患者的 EHR 数据,包括主要投诉、临床医生和阿片类药物处方详情。在此期间,我们每月进行数据采集和分析。2021 年 3 月 29 日,我们宣布减少 EHR 中常用阿片类药物的默认配药量,从 20 片减至 12 片。我们测量了接受阿片类药物治疗的每位出院患者的阿片类药物片数,根据患者人口统计学分布,以及不同临床医生开具处方行为的差异。

结果

EHR 变更与每位接受阿片类药物治疗的出院患者的阿片类药物片数减少 14%有关,从 14 片减至 12 片( = <.001)。我们发现,根据自我报告的患者种族( = 0.68)或性别( = 0.65),处方没有统计学上的显著差异。护士和 PA 平均开具的阿片类药物处方比医生多,并且与 EHR 变更相关的阿片类药物处方数量有统计学显著下降。在干预后期间,医生的阿片类药物处方也明显减少,但仍有显著下降。

结论

减少 EHR 默认值是减少阿片类药物处方的一种强大、简单的工具,在全国 42%的 ED 中都有实施的潜力,这些 ED 的默认值超过了推荐的 12 片供应量。考虑到临床医生之间存在显著的差异,未来减少阿片类药物处方的干预措施应该研究结合 EHR 默认值更改与针对临床医生群体或个别临床医生的针对性干预措施的效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b83b/11254152/401454ea690e/wjem-25-449-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b83b/11254152/2bfb3586ac83/wjem-25-449-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b83b/11254152/401454ea690e/wjem-25-449-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b83b/11254152/2bfb3586ac83/wjem-25-449-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b83b/11254152/401454ea690e/wjem-25-449-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Pragmatic Emergency Department Intervention Reducing Default Quantity of Opioid Tablets Prescribed.实用急诊科干预可减少阿片类药物片剂的默认开药量。
West J Emerg Med. 2024 Jul;25(4):449-456. doi: 10.5811/westjem.18040.
2
Effect of Changing Electronic Health Record Opioid Analgesic Dispense Quantity Defaults on the Quantity Prescribed: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.改变电子健康记录阿片类镇痛药配给数量默认值对处方数量的影响:一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e217481. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7481.
3
Association of Default Electronic Medical Record Settings With Health Care Professional Patterns of Opioid Prescribing in Emergency Departments: A Randomized Quality Improvement Study.默认电子病历设置与急诊医护人员阿片类药物处方模式的关联:一项随机质量改进研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Apr 1;180(4):487-493. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.6544.
4
By Default: The Effect of Prepopulated Prescription Quantities on Opioid Prescribing in the Emergency Department.默认情况下:预填处方数量对急诊科阿片类药物处方的影响。
West J Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;19(2):392-397. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.10.33798. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
5
Reducing the default dispense quantity for new opioid analgesic prescriptions: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.减少新阿片类镇痛药物处方的默认配药量:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 20;8(4):e019559. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019559.
6
Assessing local California trends in emergency physician opioid prescriptions from 2012 to 2020: Experiences in a large academic health system.评估 2012 年至 2020 年期间加利福尼亚州急诊医生开具阿片类药物处方的当地趋势:大型学术医疗系统的经验。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Jan;51:192-196. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.10.029. Epub 2021 Oct 24.
7
Association of Lowering Default Pill Counts in Electronic Medical Record Systems With Postoperative Opioid Prescribing.电子病历系统中降低默认药丸计数与术后阿片类药物处方之间的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Nov 1;153(11):1012-1019. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.2083.
8
Assessment of Postoperative Opioid Prescriptions Before and After Implementation of a Mandatory Prescription Drug Monitoring Program.评估实施强制性处方药物监测计划前后的术后阿片类药物处方。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Oct 1;2(10):e212924. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.2924. eCollection 2021 Oct.
9
Reduction of opioid prescribing through the sharing of individual physician opioid prescribing practices.通过共享个体医师阿片类药物处方实践来减少阿片类药物的处方。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Jan;37(1):118-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.09.052. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
10
EMR quantity autopopulation removal on hospital discharge prescribing patterns: Implications for opioid stewardship.电子病历中出院医嘱自动填写项目的去除对阿片类药物管理的影响。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2020 Feb;45(1):160-168. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13049. Epub 2019 Oct 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Prescription quantity and duration predict progression from acute to chronic opioid use in opioid-naïve Medicaid patients.处方剂量和用药时长可预测初次使用阿片类药物的医疗补助患者从急性阿片类药物使用发展为慢性阿片类药物使用的情况。
PLOS Digit Health. 2022;1(8). doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000075. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
2
Evaluation of Interventions to Reduce Opioid Prescribing for Patients Discharged From the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.评价减少急诊科出院患者阿片类药物处方干预措施的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2143425. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.43425.
3
Substitution of Nonpharmacologic Therapy With Opioid Prescribing for Pain During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,用开阿片类药物替代非药物疗法治疗疼痛。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2138453. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38453.
4
Provider Bias in prescribing opioid analgesics: a study of electronic medical Records at a Hospital Emergency Department.医疗机构开具阿片类镇痛药的偏倚:一项医院急诊科电子病历研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Aug 6;21(1):1518. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11551-9.
5
Emergency Department Utilization for Emergency Conditions During COVID-19.急诊部在 COVID-19 期间对急症的利用情况。
Ann Emerg Med. 2021 Jul;78(1):84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.01.011. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
6
Longitudinal impact of a pre-populated default quantity on emergency department opioid prescriptions.预先设定的默认剂量对急诊科阿片类药物处方的纵向影响。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Dec 19;2(1):e12337. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12337. eCollection 2021 Feb.
7
Opioid Prescribing by Primary Care Providers: a Cross-Sectional Analysis of Nurse Practitioner, Physician Assistant, and Physician Prescribing Patterns.初级保健提供者的阿片类药物处方:对执业护士、医师助理和医生处方模式的横断面分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Sep;35(9):2584-2592. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05823-0. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
8
Patient-Reported Opioid Pill Consumption After an ED Visit: How Many Pills Are People Using?急诊就诊后患者报告的阿片类药物丸剂使用量:人们使用了多少丸剂?
Pain Med. 2021 Feb 23;22(2):292-302. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa048.
9
Association of Default Electronic Medical Record Settings With Health Care Professional Patterns of Opioid Prescribing in Emergency Departments: A Randomized Quality Improvement Study.默认电子病历设置与急诊医护人员阿片类药物处方模式的关联:一项随机质量改进研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Apr 1;180(4):487-493. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.6544.
10
What is usual care for low back pain? A systematic review of health care provided to patients with low back pain in family practice and emergency departments.腰痛的常规治疗方法是什么?家庭医生和急诊科为腰痛患者提供的医疗保健的系统评价。
Pain. 2020 Apr;161(4):694-702. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001751.