• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会和非社会层面多样性与变异性判断中的溢出偏差。

Spillover bias in social and nonsocial judgments of diversity and variability.

作者信息

Mijalli Yazmine, Price Paul C, Navarro Samantha P

机构信息

Department of Psychology, California State University, Fresno, 2576 E San Ramon Ave, Fresno, CA, 93740-8039, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Oct;30(5):1829-1839. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02259-5. Epub 2023 Mar 13.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-023-02259-5
PMID:36914912
Abstract

In three experiments, we conceptually replicated and extended the spillover bias in judgments of diversity that was first reported by Daniels et al. (2017, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 139, 92-105). In the first experiment, we showed that judgments of the ethnoracial diversity of groups of people were affected by the gender diversity of those people. In the second experiment, we extended this result to nonsocial stimuli by showing that judgments of the size diversity and size variability of groups of circles were affected by the color diversity of those circles. In the third experiment, we showed that judgments of the ethnoracial diversity of groups of people were affected by the color diversity of a group of circles in the background. These results suggest that diversity spillover bias is an extremely general phenomenon that occurs for both social and nonsocial judgments of diversity and variability. We propose that it occurs because people use the overall perceived diversity in a set of stimuli as a cue to judge diversity on any specific dimension.

摘要

在三项实验中,我们从概念上复制并扩展了丹尼尔斯等人(2017年,《组织行为与人类决策过程》,第139卷,第92 - 105页)首次报道的多样性判断中的溢出偏差。在第一个实验中,我们表明对人群群体的种族多样性判断会受到这些人的性别多样性的影响。在第二个实验中,我们将这一结果扩展到非社会刺激上,表明对圆形群体的大小多样性和大小变异性的判断会受到这些圆形的颜色多样性的影响。在第三个实验中,我们表明对人群群体的种族多样性判断会受到背景中一组圆形的颜色多样性的影响。这些结果表明,多样性溢出偏差是一种极其普遍的现象,在对多样性和变异性的社会和非社会判断中都会出现。我们提出,它之所以会出现是因为人们将一组刺激中整体感知到的多样性用作判断任何特定维度上的多样性的线索。

相似文献

1
Spillover bias in social and nonsocial judgments of diversity and variability.社会和非社会层面多样性与变异性判断中的溢出偏差。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Oct;30(5):1829-1839. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02259-5. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
2
Sample size bias in judgments of perceptual averages.感知平均值判断中的样本量偏差。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Sep;40(5):1321-31. doi: 10.1037/a0036576. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
3
Contribution of a common ability in average and variability judgments.平均判断和变异性判断中的共同能力贡献。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Feb;29(1):108-115. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01982-1. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
4
Color diversity judgments in peripheral vision: Evidence against "cost-free" representations.周边视野中的颜色多样性判断:反对“无成本”表示的证据。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 30;17(12):e0279686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279686. eCollection 2022.
5
Perception of simple and complex visual stimuli: decision strategies and hemispheric differences in same-different judgments.
Perception. 1995;24(7):787-809. doi: 10.1068/p240787.
6
Reversed better-than-average effect in direct comparisons of nonsocial stimuli depends on the set size.在非社会刺激的直接比较中,反转的优于平均效应取决于集合大小。
Mem Cognit. 2014 May;42(4):639-47. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0385-7.
7
Prejudice and the Plate: Effects of Weight Bias in Nutrition Judgments.偏见与餐盘:体重偏见对营养判断的影响
Health Commun. 2016;31(2):182-92. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2014.940674. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
8
Do social utility judgments influence attentional processing?社会效用判断是否会影响注意力加工?
Cognition. 2013 Oct;129(1):114-22. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.06.011. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
9
The future is now: the impact of present fluency in judgments about the future.未来已来:当下的流畅性对未来判断的影响。
Memory. 2018 Feb;26(2):144-153. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1335328. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
10
Social bias insights concern judgments rather than real-world decisions.社会偏见洞察关注的是判断,而不是现实世界中的决策。
Behav Brain Sci. 2022 May 13;45:e68. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X21000728.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of increasing color variety on numerosity estimation and counting.颜色种类增加对数字估计和计数的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jun;32(3):1391-1401. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02625-x. Epub 2025 Jan 3.