Suppr超能文献

右心房扩大患者的永久性希氏束起搏:不同专用输送鞘的价值

Permanent His bundle pacing in patients with right atriomegaly: The value of different dedicated delivery sheaths.

作者信息

Marinaccio Leonardo, Putorti Francesco, Rocchetto Eros, Giacopelli Daniele

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Immacolata Concezione Hospital, Piove di Sacco, Padova, Italy.

School of Cardiovascular System Diseases, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2023 Apr;46(4):346-349. doi: 10.1111/pace.14685. Epub 2023 Mar 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

An enlarged right atrium (RA) is a challenging anatomy that can limit the successful use of His bundle pacing (HBP). It is unknown whether new implantation tools could help overcome these challenges.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with RA volume index >25 mL/m in men and >21 mL/m in women underwent permanent HBP. We used a stylet-driven lead (SDL) with an extendable helix delivered via a dedicated delivery sheath (Selectra 3D, Biotronik) as a first attempt. In case of failure, a second attempt was performed with the same lead but with a different delivery curve. Finally, a lumen-less lead (LLL) was also available as a third attempt.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 24 patients (median age 75.7 years [interquartile range, 70.9-79.0], 88% men) with a RA volume of 49 mL/m (45-54). Using SDL, HBP was achieved with a single sheath curve in 17 patients (71%). The second attempt with the same lead but a different sheath was successful in four more patients (SDL success 87%). The fluoroscopy time increased significantly when the second attempt was necessary (8 min [6-11] vs. 15 min [13-17], p < .001). In the remaining three patients, HBP was further attempted with a LLL leading to a final procedural success of 96%. No lead dislodgment nor significant increase in pacing threshold was observed at 1-month (1.2 [0.7-1.7] V@1.0 ms vs. 1.1 [0.8-1.7] V@1.0 ms, p = .939).

CONCLUSION

The availability of different dedicated delivery systems for HBP can improve procedural outcomes even in challenging circumstances, such as in patients with right atriomegaly.

摘要

背景

右心房(RA)增大是一种具有挑战性的解剖结构,可能会限制希氏束起搏(HBP)的成功应用。尚不清楚新型植入工具是否有助于克服这些挑战。

方法

连续纳入男性右心房容积指数>25 mL/m²且女性>21 mL/m²的患者进行永久性HBP。我们首先尝试使用通过专用输送鞘管(Selectra 3D,百多力公司)输送的带有可伸展螺旋的探条驱动导线(SDL)。若失败,则使用同一根导线但不同的输送弯形进行第二次尝试。最后,还可尝试使用无腔导线(LLL)作为第三次尝试。

结果

研究队列包括24例患者(年龄中位数75.7岁[四分位间距,70.9 - 79.0],88%为男性),右心房容积为49 mL/m²(45 - 54)。使用SDL时,17例患者(71%)通过单次鞘管弯形成功实现HBP。使用同一根导线但不同鞘管进行的第二次尝试又使4例患者成功(SDL成功率87%)。必要时进行第二次尝试时透视时间显著增加(8分钟[6 - 11] vs. 15分钟[13 - 17],p <.001)。在其余3例患者中,使用LLL进一步尝试HBP,最终手术成功率达96%。1个月时未观察到导线脱位或起搏阈值显著增加(1.2 [0.7 - 1.7]V@1.0 ms vs. 1.1 [0.8 - 1.7]V@1.0 ms,p =.939)。

结论

即使在具有挑战性的情况下,如右心房增大的患者中,不同的专用HBP输送系统也可改善手术结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验