Möhring Christian, Frontado Graffe Freddy José, Bartels Alexandra, Sadeghlar Farsaneh, Zhou Taotao, Mahn Robert, Marinova Milka, Feldmann Georg, Brossart Peter, Glowka Tim R, Kalff Jörg C, Strassburg Christian P, Gonzalez-Carmona Maria A
Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023 Feb 28;14(1):352-365. doi: 10.21037/jgo-22-632. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
Prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer is still extremely poor. First-line palliative therapies with FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel have been established in the last decade. In the second-line, 5-FU/LV in combination with nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) after gemcitabine has been shown to be effective. However, the use of nal-IRI as third-line therapy after FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine-based chemotherapies is still controversial. In this study, we report about the use of 5-FU/LV + nal-IRI in a daily practice and analyze whether nal-IRI is an option as third-line therapy after FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel.
This is a single center retrospective analysis of patients with irresectable pancreatic cancer who were treated with 5-FU/LV and nal-IRI from 2017 to 2021 as second- or third-line palliative treatment. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity were analyzed, and multivariate analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors.
Twenty-nine patients receiving 5-FU/LV and nal-IRI were included in the analysis. The majority of patients (n=19) received 5-FU/nal-IRI as third-line therapy after pre-exposition to FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. Median OS and PFS were 9.33 months (95% CI: 3.37, 15.30) and 2.90 months (95% CI: 1.64, 4.16), respectively. Furthermore, patients receiving nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV as third-line treatment also showed some benefits, with no OS difference compared to second-line patients (9.33 10.27 months; HR: 1.85; 95% CI: 0.64, 5.41; P=0.253). Adverse effects were similar to reported trials.
In our study, the use of 5-FU/nal-IRI in unselected patients with advanced pancreatic cancer showed similar OS, PFS and tolerance as randomized prospective phase II/III trials. Interestingly, the use of 5-FU/nal-IRI seemed to be beneficial in third-line therapy, despite a pre-exposure to non-liposomal irinotecan.
胰腺癌患者的预后仍然极差。在过去十年中,已确立了以FOLFIRINOX或吉西他滨/纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇进行一线姑息治疗。在二线治疗中,吉西他滨后使用5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙联合纳米脂质体伊立替康(nal-IRI)已被证明是有效的。然而,nal-IRI作为FOLFIRINOX和基于吉西他滨的化疗后的三线治疗的应用仍存在争议。在本研究中,我们报告了5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙+nal-IRI在日常临床中的应用,并分析nal-IRI是否可作为FOLFIRINOX和吉西他滨/纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇后的三线治疗选择。
这是一项单中心回顾性分析,纳入了2017年至2021年接受5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙和nal-IRI作为二线或三线姑息治疗的不可切除胰腺癌患者。分析了总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和毒性,并采用多变量分析来确定独立的预后因素。
29例接受5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙和nal-IRI治疗的患者纳入分析。大多数患者(n = 19)在接受FOLFIRINOX和吉西他滨/纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇预处理后,将5-氟尿嘧啶/nal-IRI作为三线治疗。中位OS和PFS分别为9.33个月(95%CI:3.37,15.30)和2.90个月(95%CI:1.64,4.16)。此外,接受nal-IRI + 5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙作为三线治疗的患者也显示出一些益处,与二线治疗患者相比OS无差异(9.33对10.27个月;HR:1.85;95%CI:0.64,5.41;P = 0.253)。不良反应与报道的试验相似。
在我们的研究中,在未选择的晚期胰腺癌患者中使用5-氟尿嘧啶/nal-IRI显示出与随机前瞻性II/III期试验相似的OS、PFS和耐受性。有趣的是,尽管之前使用过非脂质体伊立替康,但5-氟尿嘧啶/nal-IRI在三线治疗中似乎有益。