• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《牛津抑郁问卷中文版:一项针对心境障碍患者的效度研究》

The Chinese Version of Oxford Depression Questionnaire: A Validation Study in Patients with Mood Disorders.

作者信息

Zhu Yiyi, Wu Lingling, Ye Shuling, Fu Yaoyang, Huang Huimin, Lai Jianbo, Shi Chuan, Hu Shaohua

机构信息

School of Mental Health, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, People's Republic of China.

Department of Psychiatry, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2023 Mar 7;19:547-556. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S396356. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.2147/NDT.S396356
PMID:36915907
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10008023/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emotional blunting is prevalent in patients with mood disorders and adversely affects the overall treatment outcome. The Oxford Depression Questionnaire is a validated psychometric instrument for assessing emotional blunting. We aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the ODQ (ODQ) in Chinese patients with mood disorders.

METHODS

136 mood disorders patients and 95 healthy control participants were recruited at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine. Patients were assessed using the ODQ, Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Internal consistency reliability and test-retest reliability were analyzed. Confirmatory factor analysis and correlation analysis were used to evaluate construct and convergent validity.

RESULTS

A total of 136 patients with mood disorders and 95 healthy controls participated in this study. Cronbach α values were 0.928 (ODQ-20) and 0.945 (ODQ-26). Test-retest reliability coefficients were 0.798 (ODQ-20) and 0.836 (ODQ-26) (p<0.05); intraclass correlation coefficient values were 0.777 (ODQ-20) and 0.781 (ODQ-26) (p<0.01). The score of ODQ was positively correlated with BDI-II and MADRS (r=0.3260.719, 0.2350.537, p<0.01). The differences in the ODQ scores between the patient and control groups were statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The reliability, structural validity, and criterion validity of the ODQ applied to patients with mood disorders meet the psychometric requirements, and the scale can be used to assess emotional blunting in Chinese patients with mood disorders.

摘要

背景

情感迟钝在情绪障碍患者中普遍存在,并且对整体治疗效果产生不利影响。牛津抑郁问卷是一种经过验证的用于评估情感迟钝的心理测量工具。我们旨在评估中文版牛津抑郁问卷(ODQ)在中国情绪障碍患者中的信度和效度。

方法

在浙江大学医学院附属第一医院招募了136名情绪障碍患者和95名健康对照参与者。使用ODQ、贝克抑郁量表第二版(BDI-II)和蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)对患者进行评估。分析内部一致性信度和重测信度。采用验证性因素分析和相关分析来评估结构效度和收敛效度。

结果

共有136名情绪障碍患者和95名健康对照参与了本研究。Cronbach α值分别为0.928(ODQ-20)和0.945(ODQ-26)。重测信度系数分别为0.798(ODQ-20)和0.836(ODQ-26)(p<0.05);组内相关系数值分别为0.777(ODQ-20)和0.781(ODQ-26)(p<0.01)。ODQ得分与BDI-II和MADRS呈正相关(r=0.3260.719,0.2350.537,p<0.01)。患者组和对照组之间ODQ得分的差异具有统计学意义。

结论

应用于情绪障碍患者的ODQ的信度、结构效度和效标效度符合心理测量学要求,该量表可用于评估中国情绪障碍患者的情感迟钝。

相似文献

1
The Chinese Version of Oxford Depression Questionnaire: A Validation Study in Patients with Mood Disorders.《牛津抑郁问卷中文版:一项针对心境障碍患者的效度研究》
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2023 Mar 7;19:547-556. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S396356. eCollection 2023.
2
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Oxford Depression Questionnaire (ODQ-Chinese).中文版本的牛津抑郁问卷(ODQ-Chinese)的信度和效度。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Sep 15;313:278-282. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.06.044. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
3
Assessing Reliability and Validity of the Oxford Depression Questionnaire (ODQ) in a Japanese Clinical Population.评估牛津抑郁问卷(ODQ)在日本临床人群中的信度和效度。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2023 Nov 8;19:2401-2412. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S428443. eCollection 2023.
4
Validation of the Oxford Depression Questionnaire: Sensitivity to change, minimal clinically important difference, and response threshold for the assessment of emotional blunting.牛津抑郁问卷的验证:对情绪迟钝评估的变化敏感性、最小临床重要差异和反应阈值。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Nov 1;294:924-931. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.099. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
5
Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity of the adapted Arabic version of the Oxford shoulder score in patients with shoulder disorders.适应于肩部疾病患者的牛津肩部评分阿拉伯语版的内部一致性、重测信度和结构效度。
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Sep;43(19):2790-2796. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1714757. Epub 2020 Jan 26.
6
Psychometric evaluation of the Malay version of the Montgomery- Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS-BM).马来语版蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS-BM)的心理测量学评估。
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Aug 19;15:200. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0587-6.
7
Psychometric properties of the Clinically Useful Depression Outcome Scale supplemented with DSM-5 Mixed subtype questionnaire in Chinese patients with mood disorders.心境障碍患者补充 DSM-5 混合亚型问卷的临床有效抑郁结局量表的心理测量特性。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Jan 15;279:53-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.117. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
8
Validity and test-retest reliability of the Persian version of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale.蒙哥马利-艾斯伯格抑郁评定量表波斯语版本的效度和重测信度。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 Mar 7;12:603-7. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S103869. eCollection 2016.
9
Psychometric Properties and Factor Structures of the Korean Version of Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised.儿童抑郁评定量表修订版韩文版的心理测量特性与因子结构
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2018 May;28(4):285-292. doi: 10.1089/cap.2016.0183. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
10
A psychometric analysis of the Clinically Useful Depression Outcome Scale (CUDOS) in Spanish patients.对西班牙患者的 Clinically Useful Depression Outcome Scale(CUDOS)进行心理测量学分析。
J Affect Disord. 2013 Dec;151(3):920-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.08.007. Epub 2013 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of functional magnetic resonance imaging-guided personalized repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (fMRI-rTMS) in depressive patients with emotional blunting: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.功能磁共振成像引导下的个体化重复经颅磁刺激(fMRI-rTMS)治疗情感迟钝型抑郁症患者的疗效:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Feb 21;25(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-07976-3.
2
Assessing Reliability and Validity of the Oxford Depression Questionnaire (ODQ) in a Japanese Clinical Population.评估牛津抑郁问卷(ODQ)在日本临床人群中的信度和效度。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2023 Nov 8;19:2401-2412. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S428443. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Oxford Depression Questionnaire (ODQ-Chinese).中文版本的牛津抑郁问卷(ODQ-Chinese)的信度和效度。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Sep 15;313:278-282. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.06.044. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
2
Acceptability and face validity of two mental health screening tools for use in the routine surgical setting.两种精神健康筛查工具在常规手术环境中使用的可接受性和表面有效性。
BMC Psychol. 2021 Oct 30;9(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00672-w.
3
Validation of the Oxford Depression Questionnaire: Sensitivity to change, minimal clinically important difference, and response threshold for the assessment of emotional blunting.牛津抑郁问卷的验证:对情绪迟钝评估的变化敏感性、最小临床重要差异和反应阈值。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Nov 1;294:924-931. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.099. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
4
Screening for depression in primary care with Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9): A systematic review.用患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)在初级保健中筛查抑郁:系统评价。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Jan 15;279:473-483. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.131. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
5
The Positive and Negative Experiences of 342 Antidepressant Users.342 名抗抑郁药使用者的正、负性体验。
Community Ment Health J. 2020 May;56(4):744-752. doi: 10.1007/s10597-019-00535-0. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
6
Cross-Cultural Adaptation Of The Persian Version Of Test Of The Adherence To Inhalers (TAI).吸入器依从性测试(TAI)波斯语版本的跨文化适应
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Oct 3;13:1693-1699. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S222096. eCollection 2019.
7
Prevalence of mental disorders in China: a cross-sectional epidemiological study.中国精神障碍的患病率:一项横断面流行病学研究。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Mar;6(3):211-224. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30511-X. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
8
Treatment effectiveness and tolerability outcomes that are most important to individuals with bipolar and unipolar depression.双相和单相抑郁症患者最重要的治疗效果和耐受性结果。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Jan 15;243:116-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.09.027. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
9
Adverse Effects of Antidepressants Reported by a Large International Cohort: Emotional Blunting, Suicidality, and Withdrawal Effects.一个大型国际队列报告的抗抑郁药的不良反应:情感迟钝、自杀倾向和戒断效应。
Curr Drug Saf. 2018;13(3):176-186. doi: 10.2174/1574886313666180605095130.
10
Comparison of residual depressive symptoms and functional impairment between fully and partially remitted patients with major depressive disorder: a multicenter study.比较完全缓解和部分缓解的重性抑郁障碍患者的残留抑郁症状和功能损害:一项多中心研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Mar;261:547-553. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.01.020. Epub 2018 Jan 10.