Suppr超能文献

适应于肩部疾病患者的牛津肩部评分阿拉伯语版的内部一致性、重测信度和结构效度。

Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity of the adapted Arabic version of the Oxford shoulder score in patients with shoulder disorders.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Rehabilitation Research Chair, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Sep;43(19):2790-2796. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1714757. Epub 2020 Jan 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The current study aimed to evaluate the internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity of the translated and adapted Arabic version of the Oxford shoulder score in patients with shoulder disorders.

METHODS

One hundred four patients (average age 45.9 ± 15.2 years; female 78.8%) with shoulder disorders, including impingement syndrome, rotator cuff disorder, osteoarthritis, and adhesive capsulitis, participated. The participants were asked to complete the adapted Arabic version of the Oxford shoulder score, shoulder pain and disability index, and the Arabic numeric pain rating scale. The participants were also asked to complete the second form of the Oxford shoulder score after one week to evaluate test-retest reliability. Two Arabic native speakers translated and adapted the Arabic version of the Oxford shoulder score as per given international guidelines.

RESULTS

All patients participated in the second assessment (response rate = 100%). Test-retest reliability and internal consistency of the Oxford shoulder score were high (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.92; Cronbach's alpha coefficient, 0.91). A significant correlation between the Oxford shoulder score and the shoulder pain and disability index and Arabic numeric pain rating scale scores supported the construct validity of the scale ( < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The translated and adapted Arabic version of the Oxford shoulder score indicated adequate internal consistency, test-retest reliability and construct validity. The current study suggests that the Oxford shoulder score is a quick and easy outcome measure to assess pain and disability in patients with shoulder disorders.Implications for RehabilitationThe translated and adapted Arabic version of the Oxford shoulder score indicated adequate psychometric properties.The current study suggests that the Oxford shoulder score is a quick and easy outcome measure to assess pain and disability in patients with shoulder disorders.A significant correlation between the Oxford shoulder score and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index and Arabic Numeric Pain Rating Scale scores supported the validity of the scale.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估经翻译和改编后的阿拉伯版牛津肩部评分在肩部疾病患者中的内部一致性、重测信度和结构效度。

方法

104 名肩部疾病患者(平均年龄 45.9±15.2 岁;女性 78.8%)参与了研究,包括撞击综合征、肩袖疾病、骨关节炎和粘连性肩关节囊炎。参与者被要求完成经翻译和改编后的阿拉伯版牛津肩部评分、肩部疼痛和残疾指数以及阿拉伯数字疼痛评分量表。一周后,参与者被要求完成牛津肩部评分的第二份问卷,以评估重测信度。两名阿拉伯语母语者根据既定的国际准则对阿拉伯版牛津肩部评分进行了翻译和改编。

结果

所有患者均参与了第二次评估(应答率=100%)。牛津肩部评分的重测信度和内部一致性均较高(组内相关系数为 0.92;克朗巴赫α系数为 0.91)。牛津肩部评分与肩部疼痛和残疾指数以及阿拉伯数字疼痛评分量表评分之间存在显著相关性,支持该量表的结构效度( < 0.001)。

结论

经翻译和改编后的阿拉伯版牛津肩部评分具有良好的内部一致性、重测信度和结构效度。本研究表明,牛津肩部评分是一种快速简便的评估肩部疾病患者疼痛和残疾的结局测量工具。

意义

经翻译和改编后的阿拉伯版牛津肩部评分具有良好的心理测量学特性。本研究表明,牛津肩部评分是一种快速简便的评估肩部疾病患者疼痛和残疾的结局测量工具。牛津肩部评分与肩部疼痛和残疾指数以及阿拉伯数字疼痛评分量表评分之间存在显著相关性,支持该量表的有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验