Pharmacy Department, Hospital Universitario de Jerez de la Frontera, Jerez de la Frontera, Cádiz, Spain.
Pharmacy Department, Hospital Universitario Puerto Real, Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain.
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2023 Jun;29(4):934-943. doi: 10.1177/10781552231162545. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations have a poor prognosis and few therapeutic alternatives. We conducted a review of scientific evidence about therapies in NSCLC with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations.
A systematic review in PubMed® database was performed up to November 19, 2022. Clinical trials (CTs) about treatments of patients diagnosed with advanced or metastatic NSCLC harbouring EGFR exon 20 insertions who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy were selected. CTs with a sample size of less than 10 patients were discarded. Efficacy results were used to determine the most interesting drugs. Subsequently, a more exhaustive analysis of the design of the CTs and safety of the most interesting schemes was conducted. Comparisons were attempted to develop.
A total of 40 records were found in the systematic search. Twelve selected CTs included the following therapies: poziotinib, osimertinib, pertuzumab-trastuzumab-docetaxel scheme, mobocertinib, amivantamab, erlotinib-onalespib regimen, luminespib, ado-trastuzumab emtansine and dacomitinib. Mobocertinib, amivantamab and poziotinib were determined as the most interesting treatments according to efficacy data. Gastrointestinal and dermatological adverse reactions were relevant in these regimens. All CTs presented a non-randomised design. No reliable comparisons could be developed.
The efficacy of mobocertinib, amivantamab and poziotinib in NSCLC with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations is promising. However, therapies were assessed in single-arm CTs with low-quality evidence. Comparative studies with more extensive patient follow-up, larger sample size and better design are needed to reliably quantify the effect of these drugs.
患有非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)和表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)外显子 20 插入突变的患者预后较差,治疗选择有限。我们对 EGFR 外显子 20 插入突变的 NSCLC 治疗方法进行了科学证据的综述。
在 PubMed®数据库中进行了系统评价,检索截至 2022 年 11 月 19 日。选择了先前接受过铂类化疗的晚期或转移性 NSCLC 患者 EGFR 外显子 20 插入突变的治疗临床试验(CTs)。排除了样本量小于 10 例的 CT。使用疗效结果来确定最有趣的药物。随后,对 CT 设计和最有趣方案的安全性进行了更详尽的分析。尝试进行了比较。
系统搜索共发现 40 条记录。12 项选定的 CT 包括以下治疗方法:波齐替尼、奥希替尼、帕妥珠单抗-曲妥珠单抗-多西他赛方案、莫博替尼、阿维鲁单抗、厄洛替尼-奥奈昔布方案、鲁米那斯皮布、曲妥珠单抗-美坦辛和达科替尼。根据疗效数据,莫博替尼、阿维鲁单抗和波齐替尼被确定为最有趣的治疗方法。这些方案中出现了胃肠道和皮肤相关的不良反应。所有 CT 均采用非随机设计。无法进行可靠的比较。
莫博替尼、阿维鲁单抗和波齐替尼在 EGFR 外显子 20 插入突变的 NSCLC 中的疗效有一定的前景。然而,这些治疗方法都是在低质量证据的单臂 CT 中评估的。需要进行具有更广泛的患者随访、更大的样本量和更好设计的比较研究,以可靠地量化这些药物的效果。