Nursing Research & Evidence-Based Practice, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2023 Jun;20(3):269-280. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12639. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
Few objective measures of evidence-based practice (EBP) knowledge/skill exist. The Fresno Test, one objective method, was validated first with medicine, followed by versions for physical therapists, occupational therapists, speech therapists, social workers, dietitians, pediatric nurses, and health care students. The Fresno Test was adapted and tested with cohorts of acute care nurses. Six of the 14 items required revision to achieve acceptable psychometrics.
The aim of this second validation study was to revise and validate a new version of the test, The Modified Fresno Test-Acute Care Nursing (MFT-ACN), to determine if it could distinguish EBP knowledge/skills among acute care nurses.
A panel of eight EBP experts were engaged in multiple Delphi rounds to revise items. Individual-content validity indices (CVI) ranged from 0.83 to 1.0, with scale-CVI 0.92. Using a cohort design, a cross-sectional sample of 90 novice, master, and expert nurses were recruited via national listservs or snowball sampling to complete the revised test. Two doctorally prepared EBP experts independently scored tests using the standardized rubric.
The MFT-ACN yielded strong psychometric properties (intra-class correlation coefficients > 0.80; item discrimination indices > 0.20; item-total correlations > 0.30). One poorly performing item was dropped per a priori cut-off values. The final test included 13 items, with a Cronbach's alpha = 0.77. Item difficulty was moderate to high. Most items discriminated well between cohorts. Mean total scores were positively correlated with age, years since graduation, years of acute care experience, and formal EBP or research workshops or conferences or courses or immersions. Perceived level of EBP expertise was not associated with mean scores. Further research is recommended with a larger sample to assess the tests' responsiveness to change in EBP knowledge/skills over time and enhance its acceptability and feasibility. Additional research should further evaluate construct and concurrent validity against other objective assessments of EBP knowledge/skills.
The validated 13-item MFT-ACN can be used to evaluate EBP competencies of acute care nurses in academic and practice settings. It can also be used by nurse scientists to build a stronger evidence base on types of educational programs that excel in advancing the critical competency of EBP among our nursing workforce.
目前用于评估循证实践(EBP)知识/技能的客观方法较少。 Fresno 测试是一种客观方法,首先在医学领域得到验证,随后在物理治疗师、职业治疗师、言语治疗师、社会工作者、营养师、儿科护士和卫生保健学生中得到验证。Fresno 测试也被改编并用于急性护理护士的队列研究中。为了达到可接受的心理测量学标准,需要对 14 项中的 6 项进行修订。
本研究的第二个验证旨在修订和验证 Fresno 测试的新版本,即改良 Fresno 测试-急性护理护理版(MFT-ACN),以确定它是否能够区分急性护理护士的 EBP 知识/技能。
一个由 8 名循证实践专家组成的小组进行了多次 Delphi 回合来修订项目。个体内容有效性指数(CVI)范围为 0.83 至 1.0,量表-CVI 为 0.92。采用队列设计,通过全国名单或滚雪球抽样招募 90 名新手、硕士和专家护士组成横断面样本,完成修订后的测试。两位具有博士学位的循证实践专家使用标准化量表独立对测试进行评分。
MFT-ACN 具有较强的心理测量学特性(组内相关系数>0.80;项目区分指数>0.20;项目总分相关性>0.30)。根据事先设定的截断值,删除了一个表现不佳的项目。最终测试包括 13 个项目,克朗巴赫的 alpha 为 0.77。项目难度适中偏高。大多数项目能很好地区分队列。总平均分与年龄、毕业年限、急性护理经验年限以及正规的 EBP 或研究研讨会、会议、课程或沉浸式培训呈正相关。感知的 EBP 专业水平与平均分无关。建议进行进一步的研究,以使用更大的样本量评估该测试随时间推移对 EBP 知识/技能变化的反应能力,并提高其可接受性和可行性。还应进一步研究该测试与其他 EBP 知识/技能的客观评估之间的结构和同时效度。
经过验证的 13 项 MFT-ACN 可用于评估学术和实践环境中急性护理护士的 EBP 能力。护士科学家也可以使用它来建立一个更强的循证基础,了解哪些类型的教育项目在提高我们护理人员队伍中 EBP 的关键能力方面表现出色。