• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发餐厅食品安全文化的实证研究方法。

Development of an Empirically Derived Measure of Food Safety Culture in Restaurants.

机构信息

National Center for Environmental Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.

National Center for Environmental Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.

出版信息

J Food Prot. 2023 Mar;86(3):100043. doi: 10.1016/j.jfp.2023.100043. Epub 2023 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.jfp.2023.100043
PMID:36916550
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10018426/
Abstract

A poor food safety culture has been described as an emerging risk factor for foodborne illness outbreaks, yet there has been little research on this topic in the retail food industry. The purpose of this study was to identify and validate conceptual domains around food safety culture and develop an assessment tool that can be used to assess food workers' perceptions of their restaurant's food safety culture. The study, conducted from March 2018 through March 2019, surveyed restaurant food workers for their level of agreement with 28 statements. We received 579 responses from 331 restaurants spread across eight different health department jurisdictions. Factor analysis and structural equation modeling supported a model composed of four primary constructs. The highest rated construct was Resource Availability (x¯=4.69, sd=0.57), which assessed the availability of resources to maintain good hand hygiene. The second highest rated construct was Employee Commitment (x¯=4.49, sd=0.62), which assessed workers' perceptions of their coworkers' commitment to food safety. The last two constructs were related to management. Leadership (x¯=4.28, sd=0.69) assessed the existence of food safety policies, training, and information sharing. Management Commitment (x¯=3.94, sd=1.05) assessed whether food safety was a priority in practice. Finally, the model revealed one higher-order construct, Worker Beliefs about Food Safety Culture (x¯=4.35, sd=0.53). The findings from this study can support efforts by the restaurant industry, food safety researchers, and health departments to examine the influence and effects of food safety culture within restaurants.

摘要

不良的食品安全文化被描述为食源性疾病暴发的一个新兴风险因素,但在零售食品行业中,对此主题的研究甚少。本研究旨在确定和验证食品安全文化的概念领域,并开发一种评估工具,用于评估食品从业人员对其餐厅食品安全文化的看法。该研究于 2018 年 3 月至 2019 年 3 月进行,调查了餐厅食品从业人员对 28 项陈述的认同程度。我们从分布在八个不同卫生部门管辖区的 331 家餐厅收到了 579 份回复。因子分析和结构方程模型支持由四个主要构念组成的模型。评分最高的构念是资源可用性(x¯=4.69,sd=0.57),评估了维持良好手部卫生的资源可用性。评分第二高的构念是员工承诺(x¯=4.49,sd=0.62),评估了工人对同事对食品安全的承诺的看法。最后两个构念与管理有关。领导力(x¯=4.28,sd=0.69)评估了食品安全政策、培训和信息共享的存在。管理承诺(x¯=3.94,sd=1.05)评估了食品安全在实践中的优先程度。最后,该模型揭示了一个更高阶的构念,即工人对食品安全文化的信念(x¯=4.35,sd=0.53)。本研究的结果可以支持餐饮业、食品安全研究人员和卫生部门努力研究餐厅内食品安全文化的影响和效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27ad/10018426/b410c64f1a7f/nihms-1874535-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27ad/10018426/b410c64f1a7f/nihms-1874535-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27ad/10018426/b410c64f1a7f/nihms-1874535-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of an Empirically Derived Measure of Food Safety Culture in Restaurants.开发餐厅食品安全文化的实证研究方法。
J Food Prot. 2023 Mar;86(3):100043. doi: 10.1016/j.jfp.2023.100043. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
2
Worker and Restaurant Characteristics Associated with Food Safety Culture: An Environmental Health Specialists Network Study.与食品安全文化相关的员工和餐厅特征:一项环境卫生专家网络研究。
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2025 Apr 4. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2024.0132.
3
Inspection Frequency, Sociodemographic Factors, and Food Safety Violations in Chain and Nonchain Restaurants, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2013-2014.2013 - 2014年宾夕法尼亚州费城连锁餐厅和非连锁餐厅的检查频率、社会人口统计学因素及食品安全违规情况
Public Health Rep. 2017 Mar/Apr;132(2):180-187. doi: 10.1177/0033354916687741. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
4
Systematic environmental evaluations to identify food safety differences between outbreak and nonoutbreak restaurants.进行系统的环境评估,以确定暴发疫情的餐厅与未暴发疫情的餐厅之间的食品安全差异。
J Food Prot. 2006 Nov;69(11):2697-702. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-69.11.2697.
5
Restaurant and Staff Characteristics Related to Practices that Could Contribute to Cross-Contamination.餐厅和员工特征与可能导致交叉污染的实践有关。
J Food Prot. 2023 Dec;86(12):100182. doi: 10.1016/j.jfp.2023.100182. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
6
Restaurant Policies and Practices Related to Norovirus Outbreak Size and Duration.餐厅政策和实践与诺如病毒爆发规模和持续时间的关系。
J Food Prot. 2020 Sep 1;83(9):1607-1618. doi: 10.4315/JFP-20-102.
7
Restaurant manager and worker food safety certification and knowledge.餐厅经理和员工的食品安全认证与知识。
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2014 Nov;11(11):835-43. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2014.1787. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
8
Foodborne Illness Outbreaks at Retail Food Establishments - National Environmental Assessment Reporting System, 25 State and Local Health Departments, 2017-2019.食源性疾病在零售食品企业的暴发情况-国家环境评估报告系统,25 个州和地方卫生部门,2017-2019 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2023 Jun 2;72(6):1-11. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7206a1.
9
Epidemiology of restaurant-associated foodborne disease outbreaks, United States, 1998-2013.1998 - 2013年美国与餐厅相关的食源性疾病暴发的流行病学情况
Epidemiol Infect. 2017 Feb;145(3):523-534. doi: 10.1017/S0950268816002314. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
10
Can Aggregated Restaurant Inspection Data Help Us Understand Why Individual Foodborne Illness Outbreaks Occur?聚集的餐馆检查数据能否帮助我们理解为什么会发生个别食源性疾病爆发?
J Food Prot. 2020 May 1;83(5):788-793. doi: 10.4315/JFP-19-576.

引用本文的文献

1
Worker and Restaurant Characteristics Associated with Food Safety Culture: An Environmental Health Specialists Network Study.与食品安全文化相关的员工和餐厅特征:一项环境卫生专家网络研究。
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2025 Apr 4. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2024.0132.
2
Assessing reliability and validity of food safety culture assessment tools.评估食品安全文化评估工具的可靠性和有效性。
Heliyon. 2024 May 31;10(12):e32226. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32226. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.
3
Environmental Antecedents of Foodborne Illness Outbreaks, United States, 2017-2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Food Safety Performance in Food Manufacturing Facilities: The Influence of Management Practices on Food Handler Commitment.食品制造设施中的食品安全绩效:管理实践对食品处理人员承诺的影响。
J Food Prot. 2020 Jan;83(1):60-67. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-19-126.
2
Surveillance for Foodborne Disease Outbreaks - United States, 2009-2015.食源性疾病暴发监测 - 美国,2009-2015 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2018 Jul 27;67(10):1-11. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6710a1.
3
Foodborne illness acquired in the United States--unspecified agents.食源性疾病在美国感染--未特指病原体。
2017-2019 年美国食源性疾病暴发的环境诱因。
J Food Prot. 2024 Jul;87(7):100293. doi: 10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100293. Epub 2024 May 6.
4
Food safety culture in food companies amid the Lebanese economic crisis and the Covid-19 pandemic.黎巴嫩经济危机和新冠疫情期间食品公司的食品安全文化
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 9;9(9):e19885. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19885. eCollection 2023 Sep.
5
Case Studies of Small-Medium Food Enterprises around the World: Major Constraints and Benefits from the Implementation of Food Safety Management Systems.全球中小型食品企业案例研究:实施食品安全管理体系的主要制约因素与益处
Foods. 2023 Aug 26;12(17):3218. doi: 10.3390/foods12173218.
Emerg Infect Dis. 2011 Jan;17(1):16-22. doi: 10.3201/eid1701.091101p2.
4
Foodborne illness acquired in the United States--major pathogens.食源性疾病在美国的感染情况——主要病原体。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2011 Jan;17(1):7-15. doi: 10.3201/eid1701.p11101.
5
Surveillance for foodborne-disease outbreaks--United States, 1993-1997.美国1993 - 1997年食源性疾病暴发监测
MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 2000 Mar 17;49(1):1-62.