• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为决策辅助工具的开发提供信息:住院环境中抗精神病药物决策辅助工具的服务使用者和精神科医生的期望和愿望。

Informing the development of a decision aid: Expectations and wishes from service users and psychiatrists towards a decision aid for antipsychotics in the inpatient setting.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

kbo-Isar-Amper-Klinikum München, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2023 Jun;26(3):1327-1338. doi: 10.1111/hex.13749. Epub 2023 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13749
PMID:36916673
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10154827/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Decision aids (DAs) are promising tools to foster evidence-based shared decision-making between practitioners and service users. Nevertheless, it is still obscure how an evidence-based DA for people with severe mental illness, especially psychosis, should look in an inpatient treatment setting to be useful and feasible. Therefore, we conducted focus groups with psychiatrists and service users to collect and assess their expectations and wishes regarding an evidence-based DA. From these findings, we derived immediate recommendations for the future development of DAs.

METHODS

We held two group interviews with service users (n = 8) and three group interviews with psychiatrists (n = 10). We used an open, large-scale topic guide. First, we presented data from a current meta-analysis on antipsychotics to the interviewees and, in a second step, asked for their expectations and wishes towards a DA that integrates these data.

RESULTS

Our thematic analysis revealed six key themes addressed by the respondents: (1) general considerations on the importance and usefulness of such a DA, (2) critical comments on psychiatry and psychopharmacotherapy, (3) communicative prerequisites for the use of a DA, (4) form and content of the DA, (5) data input, data processing and output as well as (6) application of the DA and possible obstacles.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants identified several important features for the development of DAs for selecting antipsychotics in inpatient psychiatric treatment. The digital format was met with the greatest approval. Especially the adaptability to different needs, users and psychopathologies and the possibility to outsource information dissemination via app seemed to be a decisive convincing argument. Further research is required to test specific features of DAs to be developed in clinical settings.

摘要

目的

决策辅助工具(DAs)是促进从业者和服务使用者之间基于证据的共享决策的有前途的工具。然而,对于严重精神疾病患者,特别是精神病患者,在住院治疗环境中,基于证据的 DA 应该是什么样子才能具有实用性和可行性,目前仍不清楚。因此,我们与精神科医生和服务使用者进行了焦点小组讨论,以收集和评估他们对基于证据的 DA 的期望和愿望。从这些发现中,我们得出了对未来 DA 发展的直接建议。

方法

我们与 8 名服务使用者进行了两次小组访谈,与 10 名精神科医生进行了三次小组访谈。我们使用了一个开放的、大规模的主题指南。首先,我们向受访者展示了一项关于抗精神病药的当前荟萃分析数据,然后在第二步中,询问他们对整合这些数据的 DA 的期望和愿望。

结果

我们的主题分析揭示了受访者提出的六个关键主题:(1)对这样的 DA 的重要性和实用性的一般考虑,(2)对精神病学和精神药理学的批评意见,(3)使用 DA 的交流前提条件,(4)DA 的形式和内容,(5)数据输入、数据处理和输出以及(6)DA 的应用和可能的障碍。

结论

参与者确定了开发用于选择住院精神病治疗中抗精神病药的 DA 的几个重要特征。数字格式最受欢迎。特别是对不同需求、用户和精神病理学的适应性以及通过应用程序外包信息传播的可能性似乎是一个决定性的令人信服的论据。需要进一步研究来测试在临床环境中开发的特定 DA 特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9296/10154827/63b313b6a19a/HEX-26--g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9296/10154827/2ccc8594c02a/HEX-26--g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9296/10154827/63b313b6a19a/HEX-26--g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9296/10154827/2ccc8594c02a/HEX-26--g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9296/10154827/63b313b6a19a/HEX-26--g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Informing the development of a decision aid: Expectations and wishes from service users and psychiatrists towards a decision aid for antipsychotics in the inpatient setting.为决策辅助工具的开发提供信息:住院环境中抗精神病药物决策辅助工具的服务使用者和精神科医生的期望和愿望。
Health Expect. 2023 Jun;26(3):1327-1338. doi: 10.1111/hex.13749. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
2
Exploring Provider Reactions to Decision Aid Distribution and Shared Decision Making: Lessons from Two Specialties.探索医疗服务提供者对决策辅助工具分发及共同决策的反应:来自两个专业领域的经验教训。
Med Decis Making. 2017 Jan;37(1):113-126. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16671933. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
3
Continue, adjust, or stop antipsychotic medication: developing and user testing an encounter decision aid for people with first-episode and long-term psychosis.继续、调整或停止抗精神病药物治疗:为首发和长期精神病患者开发和用户测试一种就诊决策辅助工具。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 May 22;18(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1707-x.
4
Development and acceptability testing of a decision aid for considering whether to reduce antipsychotics in individuals with stable schizophrenia.开发并测试用于考虑是否减少稳定精神分裂症患者抗精神病药物的决策辅助工具的可接受性。
Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2023 Sep;43(3):391-402. doi: 10.1002/npr2.12366. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
5
Consultant psychiatrists' experiences of and attitudes towards shared decision making in antipsychotic prescribing, a qualitative study.精神科顾问医生在抗精神病药物处方中对共同决策的体验与态度:一项定性研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 May 1;14:127. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-127.
6
How Do Psychiatrists in Japan Choose Involuntary Admission, and What Do They Think of Supported Decision Making? A Thematic Analysis of Peer to Peer Interviews.日本的精神科医生如何选择非自愿住院治疗,他们对支持性决策是怎么看的?一项同行访谈的主题分析
Community Ment Health J. 2023 May;59(4):654-663. doi: 10.1007/s10597-022-01046-1. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
7
Making decisions about antipsychotics: a qualitative study of patient experience and the development of a decision aid.抗精神病药物决策:一项关于患者体验和决策辅助工具开发的定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Oct 23;19(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2304-3.
8
The role of trust and hope in antipsychotic medication reviews between GPs and service users a realist review.信任和希望在全科医生和服务使用者之间的抗精神病药物审查中的作用:一项现实主义综述。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 4;21(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03355-3.
9
Views of general practice staff about the use of a patient-oriented treatment decision aid in shared decision making for patients with type 2 diabetes: A mixed-methods study.全科医生对用于 2 型糖尿病患者共同决策的以患者为中心的治疗决策辅助工具的看法:一项混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):64-74. doi: 10.1111/hex.12586. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
10
'Triadic' shared decision making in mental health: Experiences and expectations of service users, caregivers and clinicians in Germany.“三方”共享决策在精神卫生中的应用:德国服务使用者、照护者和临床医生的经验与期望。
Health Expect. 2021 Apr;24(2):507-515. doi: 10.1111/hex.13192. Epub 2021 Jan 15.

引用本文的文献

1
From Idealist to Realist-Designing and Implementing Shared Decision-Making Interventions in the Choice of Antipsychotic Prescription in People Living With Psychosis (SHAPE): A Realist Review (Part 2-Designing SDM Interventions: Optimizing Design and Local Implementation).从理想主义者到现实主义者——为精神病患者抗精神病药物处方选择设计并实施共享决策干预措施(SHAPE):一项现实主义综述(第2部分——设计共享决策干预措施:优化设计与本地实施)
Schizophr Bull. 2025 Jul 7;51(4):932-948. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbaf059.

本文引用的文献

1
How should patient decision aids for schizophrenia treatment be designed? - A scoping review.精神分裂症治疗患者决策辅助工具应如何设计?- 范围综述。
Schizophr Res. 2023 May;255:261-273. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2023.03.025. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
2
NICE shared decision making guidelines and mental health: challenges for research, practice and implementation.英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)的共同决策指南与心理健康:研究、实践与实施面临的挑战
BJPsych Open. 2021 Sep 2;7(5):e154. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2021.987.
3
Time to Support Extensive Implementation of Shared Decision Making in Psychiatry.
是时候支持在精神病学中广泛实施共同决策了。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 1;78(11):1183-1184. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.2247.
4
Shared Risk Taking: Shared Decision Making in Serious Mental Illness.共同承担风险:严重精神疾病中的共同决策。
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Apr 1;72(4):461-463. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000156. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
5
'Triadic' shared decision making in mental health: Experiences and expectations of service users, caregivers and clinicians in Germany.“三方”共享决策在精神卫生中的应用:德国服务使用者、照护者和临床医生的经验与期望。
Health Expect. 2021 Apr;24(2):507-515. doi: 10.1111/hex.13192. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
6
Evaluating the feasibility of a decision aid to promote shared decision making among young adults with first-episode psychosis: protocol for a pilot study.评估决策辅助工具在首发精神病青年成人中促进共同决策的可行性:一项试点研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Jan 11;7(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00757-0.
7
The Pharmacologic Treatment of Schizophrenia-2021.《精神分裂症的药物治疗——2021年》
JAMA. 2021 Jan 12;325(2):175-176. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.19048.
8
Making decisions about antipsychotics: a qualitative study of patient experience and the development of a decision aid.抗精神病药物决策:一项关于患者体验和决策辅助工具开发的定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Oct 23;19(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2304-3.
9
Perceptions of shared decision-making in severe mental illness: An integrative review.严重精神疾病中共享决策的认知:综合评价。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Apr;27(2):103-127. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12558. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
10
Comparative efficacy and tolerability of 32 oral antipsychotics for the acute treatment of adults with multi-episode schizophrenia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.32 种口服抗精神病药治疗反复发作性精神分裂症成人患者的急性疗效和耐受性的比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2019 Sep 14;394(10202):939-951. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31135-3. Epub 2019 Jul 11.