• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“三方”共享决策在精神卫生中的应用:德国服务使用者、照护者和临床医生的经验与期望。

'Triadic' shared decision making in mental health: Experiences and expectations of service users, caregivers and clinicians in Germany.

机构信息

Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München: Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, München, Germany.

kbo-Isar-Amper-Klinikum München-Ost, Klinik Nord, München, Germany.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2021 Apr;24(2):507-515. doi: 10.1111/hex.13192. Epub 2021 Jan 15.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13192
PMID:33450125
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8077125/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Shared decision making (SDM) in mental health may contribute to greater patient satisfaction and is sometimes associated with better health outcomes. Here, SDM should not only involve service users and clinicians but also involve the service users' caregivers.

AIM

This study aimed to achieve better insight into the current SDM patterns of triads of service users, caregivers and clinicians in inpatient mental health care and the three parties' expectations towards the prospects of triadic SDM.

DESIGN

The current research uses data from a representative cross-sectional study on caregivers in psychiatric inpatient treatment. We analysed data on n = 94 triads of service users, their caregivers and their clinicians.

RESULTS

All three parties acknowledge caregivers to be of great support to monitor the progress with mental disease. The caregiver's role during consultations is most often described as being an expert, receiving or providing information and supporting service users. However, caregivers at times try to seek support for themselves during caregiver-clinician interaction, or their behaviour was described as unhelpful. The potential prospects of caregiver involvement are clearly acknowledged despite the low implementation of caregiver involvement in this sample (only in one-third of the cases).

CONCLUSION

Triadic SDM rarely takes place in routine inpatient care. First, there should be a focus on interventions aiming at inviting caregivers to consultations. Only in the second step should a better conceptualisation of triadic SDM be undertaken.

PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Early results were discussed with a local peer support group for caregivers of individuals living with mental illness.

摘要

背景

心理健康领域的共同决策(SDM)可能会提高患者满意度,有时还会带来更好的健康结果。在这里,SDM 不仅应涉及服务使用者和临床医生,还应涉及服务使用者的照顾者。

目的

本研究旨在更深入地了解精神科住院患者中服务使用者、照顾者和临床医生三方的 SDM 模式,以及三方对三方 SDM 前景的期望。

设计

本研究使用了一项针对精神科住院治疗中照顾者的代表性横断面研究的数据。我们分析了 n=94 例服务使用者、其照顾者和临床医生三方的配对数据。

结果

三方都承认照顾者在监测精神疾病进展方面非常有帮助。在咨询过程中,照顾者的角色最常被描述为专家,负责接收或提供信息并支持服务使用者。然而,照顾者有时会在照顾者-临床医生互动中寻求自身支持,或者他们的行为被描述为无益。尽管在该样本中仅三分之一的情况下实施了照顾者参与,但照顾者参与的潜在前景得到了明确认可。

结论

在常规住院护理中,三方 SDM 很少发生。首先,应重点关注邀请照顾者参与咨询的干预措施。只有在第二步,才应更深入地考虑三方 SDM 的概念化。

公众贡献

研究的初步结果与当地一个为照顾精神疾病患者的个人的同行支持小组进行了讨论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7fd/8077125/4e0a65c36f80/HEX-24-507-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7fd/8077125/7fdbbdfeb48b/HEX-24-507-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7fd/8077125/3e27e2a687d3/HEX-24-507-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7fd/8077125/bcf35a2caae8/HEX-24-507-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7fd/8077125/4e0a65c36f80/HEX-24-507-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7fd/8077125/7fdbbdfeb48b/HEX-24-507-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7fd/8077125/3e27e2a687d3/HEX-24-507-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7fd/8077125/bcf35a2caae8/HEX-24-507-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7fd/8077125/4e0a65c36f80/HEX-24-507-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
'Triadic' shared decision making in mental health: Experiences and expectations of service users, caregivers and clinicians in Germany.“三方”共享决策在精神卫生中的应用:德国服务使用者、照护者和临床医生的经验与期望。
Health Expect. 2021 Apr;24(2):507-515. doi: 10.1111/hex.13192. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
2
A meta-ethnography of shared decision-making in mental health care from the perspective of staff and service users.从工作人员和服务使用者的角度对精神卫生保健中的共同决策进行的元民族志研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1142. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11540-9.
3
Perceptions of shared decision-making in severe mental illness: An integrative review.严重精神疾病中共享决策的认知:综合评价。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Apr;27(2):103-127. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12558. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
4
Barriers to shared decision making in mental health care: qualitative study of the Joint Crisis Plan for psychosis.精神卫生保健中共同决策的障碍:对精神病联合危机计划的定性研究
Health Expect. 2016 Apr;19(2):448-58. doi: 10.1111/hex.12368. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
5
Past, Present, and Future Shared Decision-making Behavior Among Patients With Eczema and Caregivers.湿疹患者及其照护者过去、现在和未来的共同决策行为。
JAMA Dermatol. 2022 Aug 1;158(8):912-918. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.2441.
6
Trends, challenges, and priorities for shared decision making in mental health: The first umbrella review.精神健康领域共享决策的趋势、挑战和优先事项:首项伞式综述。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;69(4):823-840. doi: 10.1177/00207640221140291. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
7
Barriers and Enablers to Shared Decision Making in Psychiatric Medication Management: A Qualitative Investigation of Clinician and Service Users' Views.精神科药物管理中共同决策的障碍与促进因素:对临床医生和服务使用者观点的定性调查
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 17;12:678005. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.678005. eCollection 2021.
8
Caregiver involvement in psychiatric inpatient treatment - a representative survey among triads of patients, caregivers and hospital psychiatrists.照料者参与精神科住院治疗 - 患者、照料者和医院精神科医生三人组的代表性调查。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020 May 22;29:e129. doi: 10.1017/S2045796020000426.
9
Involvement of family members of older patients with cancer in triadic decision-making processes during medical consultations on an outpatient ward - an observational exploratory study using quantitative and qualitative methods.参与癌症老年患者的家庭成员在门诊病房医疗咨询中的三方决策过程-使用定量和定性方法的观察性探索性研究。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2024 Mar;15(2):101699. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101699. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
10
Exploring the potential implementation of a tool to enhance shared decision making (SDM) in mental health services in the United Kingdom: a qualitative exploration of the views of service users, carers and professionals.探索在英国心理健康服务中增强共同决策(SDM)工具的潜在实施情况:对服务使用者、护理人员和专业人员观点的定性探索。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2017 Jun 28;11:42. doi: 10.1186/s13033-017-0149-z. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Triadic Perspectives on Decision Making in Psychiatry: A Qualitative Study on Service Users, Caregivers and Healthcare Professionals in Latvia.精神病学决策的三元视角:拉脱维亚服务使用者、护理人员和医疗保健专业人员的定性研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 13;13(12):1416. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13121416.
2
Triadic shared decision making in emergency psychiatry: an explorative study.急诊精神病学中的三元共同决策:一项探索性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 5;25(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06640-7.
3
Experiencing (Shared) Decision Making: Results from a Qualitative Study of People with Mental Illness and Their Family Members.

本文引用的文献

1
Caregiver involvement in psychiatric inpatient treatment - a representative survey among triads of patients, caregivers and hospital psychiatrists.照料者参与精神科住院治疗 - 患者、照料者和医院精神科医生三人组的代表性调查。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020 May 22;29:e129. doi: 10.1017/S2045796020000426.
2
A systematic review of online interventions for families of patients with severe mental disorders.一项关于在线干预严重精神障碍患者家庭的系统评价。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Feb 15;263:147-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.106. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
3
The Shared Decision-Making Process in the Pharmacological Management of Depression.
体验(共享)决策:对患有精神疾病的患者及其家庭成员的定性研究结果
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 9;11(16):2237. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11162237.
4
Shifting Perspectives on the Challenges of Shared Decision Making in Mental Health Care.心理健康护理中共同决策挑战的视角转变
Community Ment Health J. 2024 Feb;60(2):292-307. doi: 10.1007/s10597-023-01170-6. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
5
Informing the development of a decision aid: Expectations and wishes from service users and psychiatrists towards a decision aid for antipsychotics in the inpatient setting.为决策辅助工具的开发提供信息:住院环境中抗精神病药物决策辅助工具的服务使用者和精神科医生的期望和愿望。
Health Expect. 2023 Jun;26(3):1327-1338. doi: 10.1111/hex.13749. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
6
Demands on Health Information and Clinical Practice Guidelines for Patients from the Perspective of Adults with Mental Illness and Family Members: A Qualitative Study with In-Depth Interviews.从患有精神疾病的成年人和家庭成员的角度出发,对健康信息和临床实践指南的需求:一项深入访谈的定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 1;19(21):14262. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114262.
抑郁症药物治疗中的共同决策过程。
Patient. 2020 Feb;13(1):23-30. doi: 10.1007/s40271-019-00383-w.
4
"It's a matter of building bridges…" - feasibility of a carer involvement intervention for inpatients with severe mental illness.“这是一个建立桥梁的问题……”——一项针对严重精神疾病住院患者的照顾者参与干预的可行性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Sep 3;19(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2257-6.
5
Perceptions of shared decision-making in severe mental illness: An integrative review.严重精神疾病中共享决策的认知:综合评价。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Apr;27(2):103-127. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12558. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
6
Why and How Family Caregivers Should Participate in Shared Decision Making in Mental Health.为什么及如何让家庭照护者参与精神健康的共同决策。
Psychiatr Serv. 2019 May 1;70(5):418-421. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800362. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
7
Shared decision-making with involuntary hospital patients: a qualitative study of barriers and facilitators.与非自愿住院患者的共同决策:对障碍和促进因素的定性研究
BJPsych Open. 2018 Apr 17;4(3):113-118. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2018.6. eCollection 2018 May.
8
Facilitating collaborative and effective family involvement in the cancer setting: Guidelines for clinicians (TRIO Guidelines-1).促进癌症环境下的协作和有效的家庭参与:临床医生指南(TRIO 指南-1)。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Jun;101(6):970-982. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.01.019. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
9
Managing challenging interactions with family caregivers in the cancer setting: Guidelines for clinicians (TRIO Guidelines-2).管理癌症环境中具有挑战性的医患互动:临床医生指南(TRIO 指南-2)。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Jun;101(6):983-994. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.01.020. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
10
A three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process.一种用于共同决策的三阶段谈话模型:多阶段咨询过程。
BMJ. 2017 Nov 6;359:j4891. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4891.