Ophtalmology, University and Polytechnic La Fe Hospital, Valencia, Spain.
Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD006499. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006499.pub5.
The use of botulinum toxin as an investigative and treatment modality for strabismus is well reported in the medical literature. However, it is unclear how effective it is in comparison with other treatment options for strabismus.
The primary objective was to examine the efficacy of botulinum toxin therapy in the treatment of strabismus compared with alternative conservative or surgical treatment options. This review sought to ascertain those types of strabismus that particularly benefit from the use of botulinum toxin as a treatment option (such as small angle strabismus or strabismus with binocular potential, i.e. the potential to use both eyes together as a pair). The secondary objectives were to investigate the dose effect and complication rates associated with botulinum toxin.
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS and three trials registers on 6 July 2022, together with reference checking to identify additional studies. We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials.
We planned to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing botulinum toxin with strabismus surgery, botulinum toxin alternatives (i.e. bupivacaine) and conservative therapy such as orthoptic exercises, prisms, or lens therapy for people of any age with strabismus. All relevant RCTs identified in this update compared botulinum toxin with strabismus surgery.
We used standard methods expected by Cochrane and assessed the certainty of the body of evidence using GRADE.
We included four RCTs with 242 participants that enrolled adults with esotropia or exotropia, children with acquired esotropia, and children with infantile esotropia. The follow-up period ranged from six to 36 months. Two studies were conducted in Spain, and one each in Canada and South Africa. We judged the included studies to have a mixture of low, unclear and high risk of bias. We did not consider any of the included studies to be at low risk of bias for all domains. All four studies reported the proportion of participants who improved or corrected strabismus, defined as ≤ 10 prism diopters (PD) at six months (two studies) or ≤ 8 PD at one year (two studies). Low-certainty evidence suggested that participants treated with the surgery may be more likely to improve or correct strabismus compared with those who treated with botulinum toxin (risk ratio (RR) 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53 to 0.99; I² = 50%; 4 studies, 242 participants; low-certainty evidence). One study, which enrolled 110 children with infantile esotropia, suggested that surgery may reduce the incidence of additional surgical intervention required, but the evidence was very uncertain (RR 3.05, 95% CI 1.34 to 6.91; 1 study, 101 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Two studies conducted in Spain compared botulinum toxin with surgery in children who required retreatment for acquired or infantile esotropia. These two studies provided low-certainty evidence that botulinum toxin may have little to no effect on achieving sensory fusion (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.23; I² = 0%; 2 studies, 102 participants) and stereopsis (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.25; I² = 0%; 2 studies, 102 participants) compared with surgery. Three studies reported non-serious adverse events. Partial transient ptosis (range 16.7% to 37.0%) and transient vertical deviation (range 5.6% to 18.5%) were observed among participants treated with botulinum toxin in three studies. In one study, 44.7% participants in the surgery group experienced discomfort. No studies reported serious adverse events or postintervention quality of life.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: It remains unclear whether botulinum toxin may be an alternative to strabismus surgery as an independent treatment modality among certain types of strabismus because we found only low and very low-certainty evidence in this review update. Low-certainty evidence suggests that strabismus surgery may be preferable to botulinum toxin injection to improve or correct strabismus when types of strabismus and different age groups are combined. We found low-certainty evidence suggesting botulinum toxin may have little to no effect on achievement of binocular single vision compared with surgery in children with acquired or infantile esotropia. We did not find sufficient evidence to draw any meaningful conclusions with respect to need for additional surgery, quality of life, and serious adverse events. We identified three ongoing trials comparing botulinum toxin with conventional surgeries in the varying types of strabismus, whose results will provide relevant evidence for our stated objectives. Future trials should be rigorously designed, and investigators should analyze outcome data appropriately and report adequate information to provide evidence of high certainty. Quality of life and cost-effectiveness should be examined in addition to clinical and safety outcomes.
肉毒杆菌毒素作为斜视的研究和治疗方法在医学文献中已有广泛报道。然而,与其他斜视治疗选择相比,其效果如何尚不清楚。
本研究的主要目的是评估与替代保守或手术治疗选择相比,肉毒杆菌毒素治疗斜视的疗效。本综述旨在确定肉毒杆菌毒素作为治疗选择特别有益的斜视类型(例如小角度斜视或具有 binocular potential 的斜视,即具有同时使用双眼的潜力)。次要目的是调查与肉毒杆菌毒素相关的剂量效应和并发症发生率。
我们于 2022 年 7 月 6 日在 CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase、LILACS 和三个试验注册中心进行了检索,并通过参考文献检查确定了其他研究。我们在电子检索中没有对试验进行任何日期或语言限制。
我们计划纳入比较斜视手术、肉毒杆菌毒素替代物(如布比卡因)和保守治疗(如斜视矫正训练、棱镜或镜片治疗)的随机对照试验(RCT),研究对象为任何年龄的斜视患者。本更新中所有相关的 RCT 均比较了肉毒杆菌毒素与斜视手术。
我们使用了 Cochrane 预期的标准方法,并使用 GRADE 评估证据体的确定性。
我们纳入了四项 RCT,共 242 名参与者,包括成年人的内斜视或外斜视、儿童获得性内斜视和儿童婴儿性内斜视。随访时间从 6 个月到 36 个月不等。两项研究在西班牙进行,一项在加拿大进行,一项在南非进行。我们判断纳入的研究存在低、不确定和高偏倚风险的混合情况。我们没有认为任何一项纳入的研究在所有领域都具有低偏倚风险。四项研究均报告了在 6 个月(两项研究)或 1 年(两项研究)时斜视改善或矫正的参与者比例,定义为≤ 10 棱镜度数(PD)。低确定性证据表明,与接受肉毒杆菌毒素治疗的患者相比,接受手术治疗的患者可能更有可能改善或矫正斜视(风险比(RR)0.72,95%置信区间(CI)0.53 至 0.99;I²=50%;4 项研究,242 名参与者;低确定性证据)。一项纳入 110 名婴儿性内斜视儿童的研究表明,手术可能减少需要再次手术干预的发生率,但证据非常不确定(RR 3.05,95%CI 1.34 至 6.91;1 项研究,101 名参与者;极低确定性证据)。两项在西班牙进行的研究比较了肉毒杆菌毒素与斜视手术在需要重新治疗的获得性或婴儿性内斜视儿童中的效果。这两项研究提供了低确定性证据,表明肉毒杆菌毒素对获得双眼单视功能(RR 0.88,95%CI 0.63 至 1.23;I²=0%;2 项研究,102 名参与者)和立体视(RR 0.86,95%CI 0.59 至 1.25;I²=0%;2 项研究,102 名参与者)的影响可能很小或没有。三项研究报告了非严重不良事件。在三项研究中,接受肉毒杆菌毒素治疗的参与者中观察到部分暂时性上睑下垂(范围 16.7%至 37.0%)和暂时性垂直偏差(范围 5.6%至 18.5%)。在一项研究中,手术组 44.7%的参与者感到不适。没有研究报告严重不良事件或术后生活质量。
由于本综述更新中仅发现低确定性和极低确定性证据,因此肉毒杆菌毒素是否可能成为某些类型斜视的斜视手术替代独立治疗方法仍不清楚。低确定性证据表明,当斜视类型和不同年龄组相结合时,斜视手术可能优于肉毒杆菌毒素注射,以改善或矫正斜视。我们发现低确定性证据表明,与斜视手术相比,肉毒杆菌毒素可能对获得双眼单视功能的影响很小或没有。我们没有发现足够的证据来对需要额外手术、生活质量和严重不良事件的结论进行有意义的推断。我们确定了三项正在进行的比较肉毒杆菌毒素与不同类型斜视常规手术的试验,其结果将为我们的既定目标提供相关证据。未来的试验应精心设计,研究人员应适当分析结果数据,并报告足够的信息,以提供高确定性的证据。除临床和安全性结果外,还应检查生活质量和成本效益。